Department of Social Forestry and Forest Governance, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines.
Department of Social Forestry and Forest Governance, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines; UPLB Interdisciplinary Studies Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Environment Management, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines.
Environ Res. 2020 Jul;186:109584. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109584. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
The role of local government units (LGUs) in disaster resilience is crucial for a hazard-prone country such as the Philippines. Although the country has its own institutional framework on disaster risk reduction, a number of issues limit LGUs' potential to perform its role. This study focused on building institutional resilience of LGUs towards building climate risk resilience in Aurora, Philippines by engaging key actors in the formulation of Local Climate Change Action Plans (LCCAP). The study adopted the shared learning process from the Climate Resilience Framework (CRF) to strengthen partnership and implement capacity building activities, aimed at developing the Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) and LCCAP beyond compliance. An institutional capacity assessment was administered through a survey involving 87 members of the Technical Working Group (TWG) from eight municipalities and provincial government. Institutional capacity was measured using 70 indicators representing access rights and entitlements, information flows, decision-making processes, application of new knowledge, capacity to anticipate risk, capacity to respond, as well as capacity to recover and change. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Both Spearman Correlation and Cramer's V determined the interrelationship between socio-demographic variables and institutional characteristics. Results revealed that the LGUs performed better in risk response and management. A strong correlation between expertise and position vis-à-vis all resilient institution metrics was also observed, while gender is moderately correlated with all parameters except access rights and entitlements. Three key areas, not adequately articulated in current literature, need to be improved to enhance institutional resilience towards climate and disaster risks, namely: staffing and human resource; access to financial support from other sources; and development of knowledge management systems.
地方政府单位(LGUs)在灾害恢复能力方面的作用对于菲律宾这样一个灾害多发的国家至关重要。尽管菲律宾有自己的减少灾害风险机构框架,但一些问题限制了 LGUs 发挥作用的潜力。本研究通过让关键利益攸关方参与制定地方气候变化行动计划(LCCAP),专注于增强 LGUs 的机构恢复能力,以建立菲律宾奥罗拉的气候风险恢复能力。该研究采用了气候恢复力框架(CRF)的共享学习过程,以加强伙伴关系并实施能力建设活动,旨在超越合规性制定气候和灾害风险评估(CDRA)和 LCCAP。通过一项涉及来自八个市和省政府的 87 名技术工作组(TWG)成员的调查进行机构能力评估。使用代表获取权利和应享待遇、信息流、决策过程、新知识应用、风险预测能力、响应能力以及恢复和变革能力的 70 项指标衡量机构能力。使用描述性统计数据对数据进行分析。Spearman 相关和 Cramer's V 确定了社会人口统计学变量和机构特征之间的相互关系。结果表明,LGUs 在风险应对和管理方面表现更好。还观察到专业知识和职位与所有弹性机构指标之间的强烈相关性,而性别与除获取权利和应享待遇外的所有参数呈中度相关。有三个关键领域在当前文献中没有得到充分阐述,需要加以改进,以增强机构对气候和灾害风险的恢复能力,即:人员配置和人力资源;从其他来源获得财政支持的机会;以及发展知识管理系统。