• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The personal utility and uptake of genomic sequencing in pediatric and adult conditions: eliciting societal preferences with three discrete choice experiments.个人效用和基因组测序在儿科和成人疾病中的应用:通过三个离散选择实验得出社会偏好。
Genet Med. 2020 Aug;22(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
The value of genomic sequencing in complex pediatric neurological disorders: a discrete choice experiment.基因组测序在复杂儿科神经疾病中的价值:离散选择实验。
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):155-162. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00949-2. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.临床基因组测序中偶然发现结果反馈的社会偏好:一项离散选择实验
CMAJ. 2015 Apr 7;187(6):E190-E197. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140697. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
The value of genomic testing in severe childhood speech disorders.基因组检测在严重儿童言语障碍中的价值。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Apr;32(4):440-447. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01534-w. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚生育治疗的社会偏好:基于选择的离散选择实验。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Preferences and values for rapid genomic testing in critically ill infants and children: a discrete choice experiment.危重症婴儿和儿童快速基因组检测的偏好和价值观:一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Nov;29(11):1645-1653. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00874-1. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Health-care practitioners' preferences for the return of secondary findings from next-generation sequencing: a discrete choice experiment.卫生保健从业者对下一代测序中二次发现结果返还的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Genet Med. 2020 Dec;22(12):2011-2019. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0927-x. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Do health professionals value genomic testing? A discrete choice experiment in inherited cardiovascular disease.健康专业人员是否重视基因组检测?遗传性心血管疾病中的离散选择实验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Nov;27(11):1639-1648. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0452-z. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Comparison of a full and partial choice set design in a labeled discrete choice experiment.全选择集和部分选择集设计在标记离散选择实验中的比较。
Health Econ. 2023 Jun;32(6):1284-1304. doi: 10.1002/hec.4666. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
10
Value of whole-genome sequencing to Australian cancer patients and their first-degree relatives participating in a genomic sequencing study.全基因组测序对参与基因组测序研究的澳大利亚癌症患者及其一级亲属的价值。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):96-108. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1455. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering Clinical Implementation of Polygenic Scores in Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment: Recipients' Perspectives on Influencing Factors and Strategies.遗传性癌症风险评估中多基因评分的临床应用考量:接受者对影响因素及策略的看法
Patient. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00747-5.
2
Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in Australia.公众对基因组新生儿筛查的价值和实施的偏好:来自澳大利亚两项离散选择实验的见解。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 3;112(7):1515-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.001. Epub 2025 May 28.
3
A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.基因组计划路线图,以促进社会心理和经济证据,推动政策与实践发展。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00917-4.
4
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
5
The Health Economics of Genomic Technologies: A Growing Evidence Base on Value.基因组技术的卫生经济学:基于价值的证据基础不断扩大。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00970-z. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
6
Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework.将偏好纳入基因组医学健康经济模型的方法:批判性解释性综合与概念框架
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):337-358. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00945-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
7
Australian Preferences for Prenatal Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Comparing Metropolitan and Rural/Regional Areas.澳大利亚人对产前筛查的偏好:一项比较大都市和农村/地区的离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):493-506. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00938-5. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
8
Genetic Test Utilization and Cost among Families of Children Evaluated for Genetic Conditions: An Analysis of USA Commercial Claims Data.接受遗传疾病评估儿童家庭的基因检测应用情况及费用:基于美国商业索赔数据的分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):519-530. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00942-9. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
9
How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review.癌症分子检测中的价值如何定义?一项范围综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):409-424. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00901-4. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
10
Public Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Risk-Informed Chronic Disease Screening and Early Detection: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.公众对基于遗传和基因组风险信息的慢性病筛查及早期检测的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):395-408. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00893-1. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

个人效用和基因组测序在儿科和成人疾病中的应用:通过三个离散选择实验得出社会偏好。

The personal utility and uptake of genomic sequencing in pediatric and adult conditions: eliciting societal preferences with three discrete choice experiments.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2020 Aug;22(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2
PMID:32371919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7394876/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the personal utility and uptake of genomic sequencing (GS) across pediatric and adult-onset genetic conditions.

METHODS

Three discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys were designed and administered to separate representative samples of the Australian public. Bayesian D-efficient explicit partial profile designs were used. Choice data were analyzed using a panel error component random parameter logit model.

RESULTS

Overall, 1913 participants completed the pediatric (n = 533), symptomatic adult (n = 700) and at-risk adult (n = 680) surveys. The willingness-to-pay for GS information in pediatric conditions was estimated at $5470-$15,250 (US$3830-$10,675) depending on the benefits of genomic information. Uptake ranged between 60% and 81%. For symptomatic adults, the value of GS was estimated at $1573-$8102 (US$1100-$5671) and uptake at 34-82%. For at-risk adults, GS was valued at $2036-$5004 (US$1425-$3503) and uptake was predicted at 35-61%.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial personal utility in GS, particularly for pediatric conditions. Personal utility increased as the perceived benefits of genomic information increased. The clinical and regulatory context, and individuals' sociodemographic and attitudinal characteristics influenced the value and uptake of GS. Society values highly the diagnostic, clinical, and nonclinical benefits of GS. The personal utility of GS should be considered in health-care decision-making.

摘要

目的

评估基因组测序(GS)在儿科和成人发病遗传疾病中的个人效用和接受程度。

方法

设计并向澳大利亚公众的三个代表性样本分别进行了三次离散选择实验(DCE)调查。使用贝叶斯 D 有效显式部分概况设计。使用面板误差分量随机参数对数模型分析选择数据。

结果

共有 1913 名参与者完成了儿科(n=533)、有症状成人(n=700)和高危成人(n=680)调查。根据基因组信息的收益,GS 信息在儿科疾病中的支付意愿估计为 5470-15250 美元(3830-10675 美元)。接受程度在 60%-81%之间。对于有症状的成年人,GS 的价值估计为 1573-8102 美元(1100-5671 美元),接受程度为 34-82%。对于高危成年人,GS 的价值估计为 2036-5004 美元(1425-3503 美元),预计接受程度为 35-61%。

结论

GS 具有很大的个人效用,特别是对于儿科疾病。随着基因组信息的预期收益增加,个人效用也随之增加。临床和监管背景以及个体的社会人口统计学和态度特征影响了 GS 的价值和接受程度。社会高度重视 GS 的诊断、临床和非临床益处。在医疗保健决策中应考虑 GS 的个人效用。