Salisbury Amber, Norris Sarah, Pearce Alison, Howard Kirsten
Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):493-506. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00938-5. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
Non-invasive prenatal testing has the potential to be a useful genetic screening tool in Australia. However, concerns have been raised about its cost, commercial provision, the psychological impacts of the screening process, and disparities in access experienced by rural and regional communities.
The aims of this study are (1) to estimate Australian preferences for features of prenatal screening; (2) to explore potential variations in preferences between metropolitan and rural/regional communities; (3) to estimate the extent to which respondents are willing to trade-off between attributes, using willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to wait estimates.
A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with 12 choice tasks. The DCE recruited participants from metropolitan (n = 160) and rural/regional (n = 168) locations across Australia. Mixed logit and latent class analyses were conducted and WTP and willingness to wait were calculated.
Both metropolitan and rural/regional preferences were significantly impacted by the false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and cost. In addition, rural preferences were significantly impacted by the scope of the conditions covered, the inconclusive rate, and wait times. The number of screening tests and revealing the sex of the foetus were not significant within either group. Willingness to pay estimates ranged from AU$13 to avoid a test with a 1% increase in the false-positive rate to AU$323 to screen for a wide range of conditions.
This study highlights the importance of considering differing preferences between rural and metropolitan populations when delivering prenatal screening. Further, this study provides Australian-specific WTP estimates to be incorporated into economic evaluations.
在澳大利亚,无创产前检测有潜力成为一种有用的基因筛查工具。然而,人们对其成本、商业供应、筛查过程的心理影响以及农村和地区社区在获取检测方面存在的差异表示担忧。
本研究的目的是:(1)估计澳大利亚人对产前筛查特征的偏好;(2)探讨大城市与农村/地区社区在偏好上的潜在差异;(3)使用支付意愿(WTP)和等待意愿估计值,估计受访者在各属性之间进行权衡的程度。
进行了一项包含12个选择任务的离散选择实验(DCE)。DCE从澳大利亚各地的大城市(n = 160)和农村/地区(n = 168)招募参与者。进行了混合逻辑回归和潜在类别分析,并计算了支付意愿和等待意愿。
大城市和农村/地区的偏好均受到假阳性率、假阴性率和成本的显著影响。此外,农村地区的偏好还受到所涵盖病症范围、不确定率和等待时间的显著影响。两组中筛查测试的数量和透露胎儿性别均不显著。支付意愿估计值范围从为避免假阳性率增加1%的检测支付13澳元到为筛查多种病症支付323澳元不等。
本研究强调了在提供产前筛查时考虑农村和大城市人群不同偏好的重要性。此外,本研究提供了澳大利亚特定的支付意愿估计值,以便纳入经济评估。