Description and relationships of the parotid gland levels proposed by the European Salivary Gland Society staging system: an anatomical study.

OBJECTIVES

To perform an anatomical study to analyze the size, weight, and the relationships of the parotid levels proposed by the European Salivary Gland Society (ESGS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anatomical dissections of the parotid region in 19 human specimens were performed. All dissections were systematically carried out to study the dimensions and weight of each level. We also studied the facial nerve distribution between the different levels and the relative position of the facial nerve main trunk and parotid duct in regard to the Frankfort line plane.

RESULTS

The facial nerve trunk and the parotid duct were identified in all the 19 specimens, which made it feasible to define the 4 principal levels of the parotid gland body (levels I-IV). Level V was identified in 9 out of 19 dissections (47.5%). For the whole gland, the mean for the height and width dimensions were 66.37 mm and 46.84 mm, respectively, and it weighted 18.13 g. In terms of relative weight regarding the whole gland, level II was always the heaviest, representing from 41 to 47% of the gland's weight, depending on the presence of level V. Levels I and III represent almost the same amount of relative weight as they range from 20 to 22% for each one. Level IV was the lightest body level representing 8-10% of the whole, and when present, level V represented less than 5% of the whole parotid weight. The temporal and zygomatic terminal branches were always found between the cranial levels, whereas the cervical and marginal nerves lie in all cases between the caudal levels. The buccal branches had multiple ramifications that lie between both cranial and caudal levels in 47% of the cases, being found exclusively between cranial levels in 21% and between the caudal levels in the remaining 32%.

CONCLUSION

As traditionally reported, the caudal superficial portion of the gland represents the most voluminous portion of the gland, being labeled in our classification as level II. Levels I and III represent similar amounts of gland, though presenting a significantly different morphological disposition. Level IV is the smallest portion of the body gland and level V, when present represents a scarce 5% of the whole body gland weight. The ESGS levels have a clear anatomical basis and the basic references needed to define them are always present.