• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境税、能源消耗与环境质量:具有政策意义的理论探讨。

Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: Theoretical survey with policy implications.

机构信息

Institute of Guangdong Economy & Social Development, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics (GDUFE), 510320, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

School of Economics, Shandong University, 250100, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):24848-24862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4. Epub 2020 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4
PMID:32372356
Abstract

Improving energy efficiency and mitigating environmental problems through environmental regulations and taxes are considered as fundamental driving forces of climate change policies. However, the current literature on the theoretical and empirical evidence focusing on the inter-linkages between environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality is rather meager. This article attempts to provide a detailed survey on the earlier literature for developed, developing, and emerging countries analysis by covering the literature up to 2020. The prime objective of this survey is the coverage of different level of economies, modeling, methodologies, time periods as well as empirical outcomes. The study mainly covers three types of causality direction: (i) environmental taxes, energy consumption, and energy efficiency; (ii) environmental taxes and environmental quality; (iii) energy consumption (renewables, non-renewable, and fossil fuels) and environment deterioration. Most of the empirical studies reported that the energy usage for economic activities significantly affects the pollutant emissions. However, the role of environmental taxes is still ambiguous and demands a more in-depth investigation. Comprehending the literature survey has provided the basis to address the policymaking, designing as well as the implementation of environmental regulations.

摘要

通过环境法规和税收来提高能源效率和减轻环境问题被认为是气候变化政策的基本驱动力。然而,目前关于环境税、能源消耗和环境质量之间相互关系的理论和实证证据的文献相当匮乏。本文试图通过涵盖截至 2020 年的文献,对发达国家、发展中国家和新兴国家的早期文献进行详细调查。该调查的主要目的是涵盖不同经济水平、模型、方法、时间段以及实证结果。本研究主要涵盖三种因果关系方向:(i)环境税、能源消耗和能源效率;(ii)环境税和环境质量;(iii)能源消耗(可再生能源、不可再生能源和化石燃料)和环境恶化。大多数实证研究报告称,经济活动中的能源使用显著影响污染物排放。然而,环境税的作用仍不明确,需要更深入的研究。理解文献调查为制定政策、设计和实施环境法规提供了基础。

相似文献

1
Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: Theoretical survey with policy implications.环境税、能源消耗与环境质量:具有政策意义的理论探讨。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):24848-24862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions with the roles of environmental technology and financial development.环境税与碳排放之间的关系以及环境技术和金融发展的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242412. eCollection 2020.
3
Examining the impact of environmental technologies, environmental taxes, energy consumption, and natural resources on GHG emissions in G-7 economies.考察环境技术、环境税、能源消耗和自然资源对 G7 经济体温室气体排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):106611-106624. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29885-9. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries.环境税和技术对温室气体排放的影响:主要排放欧洲国家的背景证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):22758-22767. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
5
A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: The role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes.迈向减少亚洲主要经济体空气污染的一步:绿色能源、生态创新和环境税的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 1;297:113420. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113420. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: An empirical study in the context of COP-21.技术创新与环境税助力无碳经济:基于 COP-21 背景的实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113418. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113418. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Eco-innovations, green growth, and environmental taxes in EU countries: a panel quantile regression approach.欧盟国家的生态创新、绿色增长与环境税:面板分位数回归方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(49):108005-108022. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29957-w. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Can environmental taxes and green-energy offer carbon-free E7 economies? An empirical analysis in the framework of COP-26.环境税和绿色能源能否为 E7 经济体提供无碳经济?COP-26 框架下的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):51726-51739. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25904-x. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
The effects of environmental taxes, renewable energy consumption and environmental technology on the ecological footprint: Evidence from advanced panel data analysis.环境税、可再生能源消费和环境技术对生态足迹的影响:来自高级面板数据分析的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118857. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118857. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
10
Green innovation and environmental quality in OECD countries: the mediating role of renewable energy and carbon taxes.经合组织国家的绿色创新与环境质量:可再生能源和碳税的中介作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(2):2214-2227. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31111-5. Epub 2023 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Water Content on the Combustion Characteristics of Hydrous Ethanol/RP-3 Mixed Fuel.
ACS Omega. 2025 Mar 11;10(11):11463-11473. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c11580. eCollection 2025 Mar 25.
2
The role of ICT investment, digital financial inclusion, and environmental tax in promoting sustainable energy development in the MENA region: Evidences with Dynamic Common Correlated Effects (DCE) and instrumental variable-adjusted DCE.ICT 投资、数字金融包容度以及环境税在促进 MENA 地区可持续能源发展中的作用:基于动态共同相关效应(DCE)和工具变量调整的 DCE 的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0301838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301838. eCollection 2024.
3
An environmental perspective of energy consumption, overpopulation, and human capital barriers in South Asia.南亚的能源消耗、人口过剩和人力资本障碍的环境视角。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53950-z.
4
Does being stricter mean doing better? Different effects of environmental policy stringency on quality of life, green innovation, and international cooperation.更严格意味着做得更好吗?环境政策严格程度对生活质量、绿色创新和国际合作的不同影响。
Heliyon. 2023 May 18;9(5):e16388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16388. eCollection 2023 May.
5
The effect of mineral saving and energy on the ecological footprint in an emerging market: evidence from novel Fourier based approaches.新兴市场中节约矿产和能源对生态足迹的影响:基于新型傅里叶方法的证据
Lett Spat Resour Sci. 2023;16(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s12076-023-00328-w. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation.环境税对产业绿色转型的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16749. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416749.
7
Analytical method to derive environmental policy effects in an endogenous growth model with leisure.在具有闲暇的内生增长模型中推导环境政策效应的分析方法。
MethodsX. 2022 Sep 13;9:101840. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101840. eCollection 2022.
8
Exploring the Impact and Path of Environmental Protection Tax on Different Air Pollutant Emissions.探讨环境保护税对不同空气污染物排放的影响和作用路径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084767.
9
COVID-19 restrictions and greenhouse gas savings in selected Islamic and MENA countries: An environmental input-output approach for climate policies.选定伊斯兰国家和中东及北非地区国家的新冠疫情限制措施与温室气体减排:气候政策的环境投入产出方法
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(12):13937-13989. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-02018-3. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
Asymmetric effect of structural change and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions: designing an SDG framework for Turkey.结构变化和可再生能源消费对碳排放的不对称影响:为土耳其设计一个可持续发展目标框架。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(1):528-556. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-02065-w. Epub 2022 Jan 4.