Choudhary Shalini, Gupta Rashmi
Shaheed Rajguru College of Applied Sciences for Women, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 21;11:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00714. eCollection 2020.
The present paper discusses how cultural context can be used as an essential tool in the diagnosis of mental disorders as well as in segregating individuals with normal or abnormal personality functioning. Further, such information about the culture can be used to diagnose individuals specifically with borderline personality disorder (BPD). BPD is a mental illness marked by impulsivity and instability in interpersonal relationships, moods, and self-image. We discuss how culture shapes patterns of behavior in the individual with BPD. An extensive review of manifestation of BPD in eastern countries suggests that culture and social norms are the two crucial factors, which can differentiate normal and abnormal behavioral patterns in BPD. For example, the social norms shape and give directions to our interpersonal functioning, emotions are experienced within the cultural context and expressed accordingly, and self is a reflection and representation of one's culture. Hence, these constructs of BPD (such as interpersonal functioning, emotions, and self) indicate that they are experienced differently in different cultures and vary on the continuum of normal to abnormal personality functioning. The cultural manifestation of BPD helps to understand the specific profile of the three constructs of BPD in an eastern culture like India. A synthesis of studies on prevalence, development, and symptom presentation of BPD in the Indian context is emphasized to support the personality functioning within the constructs of BPD. The literature review indicates that BPD research in India is based only on a few cases and a tiny sample of such patients. However, studies on BPD in the cultural context are minimal and incomprehensive. Hence, it suggests the importance of more empirical studies concerning the appropriate diagnosis of BPD within the cultural context of India.
本文讨论了文化背景如何作为诊断精神障碍以及区分人格功能正常或异常个体的重要工具。此外,关于文化的此类信息可用于专门诊断患有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的个体。BPD是一种以人际关系、情绪和自我形象的冲动性和不稳定性为特征的精神疾病。我们讨论了文化如何塑造BPD个体的行为模式。对BPD在东方国家表现的广泛综述表明,文化和社会规范是两个关键因素,它们可以区分BPD中正常和异常的行为模式。例如,社会规范塑造并指导我们的人际功能,情绪在文化背景中体验并相应地表达,自我是一个人文化的反映和体现。因此,BPD的这些结构(如人际功能、情绪和自我)表明,它们在不同文化中体验不同,在正常到异常人格功能的连续体上也有所不同。BPD的文化表现有助于理解在印度这样的东方文化中BPD三种结构的具体特征。强调对印度背景下BPD的患病率、发展和症状表现的研究综合,以支持BPD结构内的人格功能。文献综述表明,印度的BPD研究仅基于少数病例和此类患者的极小样本。然而,在文化背景下对BPD的研究很少且不全面。因此,这表明在印度文化背景下进行更多关于BPD正确诊断的实证研究的重要性。