Souza Leite Wagner, Novaes Alita, Bandeira Monique, Olympia Ribeiro Emanuelle, Dos Santos Alice Miranda, de Moura Pedro Henrique, Morais Caio César, Rattes Catarina, Richtrmoc Maria Karoline, Souza Juliana, Correia de Lima Gustavo Henrique, Pinheiro Modolo Norma Sueli, Gonçalves Antonio Christian Evangelista, Ramirez Gonzalez Carlos Alfredo, do Amparo Andrade Maria, Dornelas De Andrade Armèle, Cunha Brandão Daniella, Lima Campos Shirley
Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020 Apr 29;15(1):650. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2020.650. eCollection 2020 Jan 28.
Studies regarding asynchrony in patients in the cardiac postoperative period are still only a few. The main objective of our study was to compare asynchronies incidence and its index (AI) in 3 different modes of ventilation (volume-controlled ventilation [VCV], pressure-controlled ventilation [PCV] and pressure-support ventilation [PSV]) after ICU admission for postoperative care.
A prospective parallel randomised trialin the setting of a non-profitable hospital in Brazil. The participants were patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to VCV or PCV modes of ventilation and later both groups were transitioned to PSV mode.
All data were recorded for 5 minutes in each of the three different phases: T1) in assisted breath, T2) initial spontaneous breath and T3) final spontaneous breath, a marking point prior to extubation. Asynchronies were detected and counted by visual inspection method by two independent investigators. Reliability, inter-rater agreement of asynchronies, asynchronies incidence, total and specific asynchrony indexes (AIt and AI) and odds of AI ≥10% weighted by total asynchrony were analysed. A total of 17 patients randomly allocated to the VCV (n=9) or PCV (n=8) group completed the study. High inter-rated agreement for AI (ICC 0.978; IC%, 0,963-0.987) and good reliability (r=0.945; <0.001) were found. Eighty-two % of patients presented asynchronies, although only 7% of their total breathing cycles were asynchronous. Early cycling and double triggering had the highest rates of asynchrony with no difference between groups. The highest odds of AI ≥10% were observed in VCV regardless the phase: OR 2.79 (1.36-5.73) in T1 T2, =0.005; OR 2.61 (1.27-5.37) in T1 vs T3, =0.009 and OR 4.99 (2.37-10.37) in T2 T3, <0.001.
There was a high incidence of breathing asynchrony in postoperative cardiac patients, especially when initially ventilated in VCV. VCV group had a higher chance of AI ≥10% and this chance remained high in the following PSV phases.
关于心脏术后患者不同步现象的研究仍然较少。我们研究的主要目的是比较重症监护病房(ICU)收治的术后患者在三种不同通气模式(容量控制通气[VCV]、压力控制通气[PCV]和压力支持通气[PSV])下不同步现象的发生率及其指数(AI)。
在巴西一家非营利性医院进行的一项前瞻性平行随机试验。参与者为计划接受心脏手术的患者。患者被随机分配至VCV或PCV通气模式,随后两组均转换至PSV模式。
在三个不同阶段(T1:辅助呼吸时;T2:初始自主呼吸时;T3:拔管前的最终自主呼吸时),每个阶段均记录5分钟的所有数据。由两名独立研究人员通过视觉检查法检测并计数不同步现象。分析了可靠性、不同步现象的评分者间一致性、不同步现象发生率、总及特定不同步指数(AIt和AI)以及总不同步加权后AI≥10%的比值比。共有17名随机分配至VCV组(n = 9)或PCV组(n = 8)的患者完成了研究。发现AI具有较高的评分者间一致性(ICC 0.978;IC%,0.963 - 0.987)和良好的可靠性(r = 0.945;<0.001)。82%的患者出现不同步现象,尽管其总呼吸周期中只有7%为不同步。早期触发和双重触发的不同步发生率最高,两组之间无差异。无论在哪个阶段,VCV组中AI≥10%的比值比最高:T1与T2相比,OR为2.79(1.36 - 5.73),P = 0.005;T1与T3相比,OR为2.61(1.27 - 5.37),P = 0.009;T2与T3相比,OR为4.99(2.37 - 10.37),P<0.001。
心脏术后患者呼吸不同步现象发生率较高,尤其是在最初采用VCV通气时。VCV组中AI≥10%的可能性更高,且在随后的PSV阶段这种可能性仍然较高。