Kang Woon-Seok, Kim Seong-Hyop, Chung Jin Woo
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University Medical Center; Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University Medical Center; Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):908-13. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.10.014. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
Impaired pulmonary gas exchange after cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) often occurs, and the selection of mechanical ventilation mode, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) or volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), may be important for preventing hypoxia and improving oxygenation. The authors hypothesized that patients with PCV would show better oxygenation, compared with VCV, during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for mitral valve repair surgery (MVP) via thoracotomy.
Randomized controlled trial.
University teaching hospital.
Sixty patients in each group.
MVP was performed using thoracotomy with OLV by PCV or VCV.
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) were measured before anesthesia induction (T0), at skin incision (T1), after administration of heparin (T2), at 30 minutes after CPB weaning (T3), just before departure from the operating room to the intensive care unit (ICU) (T4), and 1 hour after ICU admission (T5), and PaO2/FIO2 ratio was calculated. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean) were recorded at T1, T2, T3, and T4. No significant difference was noted in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio between the groups at any measured point. PIP in the PCV group at all measured points was lower than that in the VCV group (T1, p<0.001; T2, p<0.001; T3, p<0.001; T4, p=0.025, respectively). Pmean was not different between the two groups at any measured point.
PCV during OLV in patients undergoing MVP via a thoracotomy with OLV showed lower PIP compared with VCV, but this did not improve pulmonary gas exchange.
体外循环心脏手术后常出现肺气体交换受损,选择机械通气模式,即压力控制通气(PCV)或容量控制通气(VCV),对于预防缺氧和改善氧合可能很重要。作者假设,在通过开胸进行二尖瓣修复手术(MVP)的单肺通气(OLV)期间,与VCV相比,采用PCV的患者氧合情况会更好。
随机对照试验。
大学教学医院。
每组60例患者。
通过PCV或VCV进行开胸OLV下的MVP手术。
在麻醉诱导前(T0)、皮肤切开时(T1)、给予肝素后(T2)、体外循环停机后30分钟(T3)、刚从手术室转至重症监护病房(ICU)前(T4)以及入住ICU 1小时后(T5)测量动脉血氧分压(PaO2)和吸入氧分数(FIO2),并计算PaO2/FIO2比值。在T1、T2、T3和T4记录吸气峰压(PIP)和平均吸气压力(Pmean)。在任何测量点,两组之间的PaO2/FIO2比值均无显著差异。PCV组在所有测量点的PIP均低于VCV组(T1,p<0.001;T2,p<0.001;T3,p<0.001;T4,p = 0.025)。两组在任何测量点的Pmean均无差异。
在通过开胸OLV进行MVP手术的患者中,OLV期间PCV与VCV相比PIP较低,但这并未改善肺气体交换。