• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patterns of healthcare resource utilization prior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with radiculopathy.神经根病患者颈椎前路减压融合术前的医疗资源利用模式。
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):25. doi: 10.14444/4025. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术伴或不伴直接钩椎关节减压的临床和影像学结果比较
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.009.
3
What Are the Costs of Cervical Radiculopathy Prior to Surgical Treatment?颈椎神经根病手术治疗前的成本是多少?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 1;44(13):937-942. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002983.
4
Is anterior cervical fusion with a porous tantalum implant a cost-effective method to treat cervical disc disease with radiculopathy?前路颈椎融合术联合多孔钽植入物治疗伴有根性症状的颈椎病是否具有成本效益?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1734-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318255a184.
5
Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.颈椎间盘置换术临床试验中(FDA 调查设备豁免)及之外的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后再次手术的影响因素。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.成本效益分析:比较单节段颈椎间盘置换术与单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):546-54. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12623. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
7
Young adults undergoing ACDF surgery exhibit decreased health-related quality of life in the long term in comparison to the general population.行颈椎前路融合术的青年患者与普通人群相比,其长期健康相关生活质量降低。
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):924-936. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
A 5- to 8-year randomized study on the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion plus physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone.一项关于神经根型颈椎病治疗的5至8年随机研究:颈椎前路减压融合术加物理治疗与单纯物理治疗的对比
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jan;26(1):19-27. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.SPINE151427. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.美国食品药品监督管理局器械临床试验豁免(IDE)前瞻性随机对照临床试验比较PCM颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的长期结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):674-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869.
10
Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.2006 年至 2013 年期间美国颈椎间盘置换术和前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的资源利用和比率趋势。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.072. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion provision and outcomes for cervical stenosis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术在颈椎管狭窄症治疗中的应用及疗效差异。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Apr 14;14:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100217. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Regional Variation in Nonoperative Therapy Utilization for Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis: A 2-Year Costs Analysis.症状性腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎滑脱症非手术治疗的区域差异:一项为期两年的成本分析。
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2):138-147. doi: 10.1177/2192568219844227. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of insurance carrier, prior authorization, and socioeconomic status on appropriate use of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in private community-based office practice.保险公司、事先授权和社会经济地位对基于社区的私人诊所中SPECT心肌灌注成像合理使用的影响。
Clin Cardiol. 2015 May;38(5):267-73. doi: 10.1002/clc.22382. Epub 2015 May 8.
2
Prevalence and Costs of Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy After Primary TJA.初次全膝关节置换术后康复与物理治疗的患病率及费用
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.030. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
3
Preoperative predictors of increased hospital costs in elective anterior cervical fusions: a single-institution analysis of 1,082 patients.择期颈椎前路融合术中医院费用增加的术前预测因素:对1082例患者的单机构分析
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):841-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.022. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
What is the level of evidence substantiating the Medicare local coverage determinations?支持医疗保险本地覆盖范围判定的证据水平如何?
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
5
Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: a multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study.硬膜外类固醇注射、保守治疗或联合治疗颈椎神经根痛:一项多中心、随机、比较有效性研究。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):1045-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000409.
6
Cost-effectiveness of cervical total disc replacement vs fusion for the treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease.颈椎间盘置换与融合治疗 2 节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的成本效益比较。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec;149(12):1231-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.716.
7
The 5-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的5年成本效益:一项马尔可夫分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 1;39(23):1924-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000562.
8
Trends over time and regional variations in the rate of laser trabeculoplasty in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中激光小梁成形术发生率随时间的变化趋势及地区差异。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;132(6):685-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.369.
9
The Cost Effectiveness of Polyetheretheketone (PEEK) Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的成本效益分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Oct;28(8):E482-92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa3676.
10
Determinants of direct medical costs in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术和翻修全膝关节置换术的直接医疗成本决定因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):206-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2508-z.

神经根病患者颈椎前路减压融合术前的医疗资源利用模式。

Patterns of healthcare resource utilization prior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with radiculopathy.

作者信息

Virk Sohrab, Phillips Frank M, Khan Safdar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):25. doi: 10.14444/4025. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.14444/4025
PMID:32373448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7117795/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess patterns of healthcare resource utilization prior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in patients diagnosed with radiculopathy with a retrospective cohort study design.

BACKGROUND

ACDF is associated with improvement in quality of life among patients with cervical radiculopathy. However, little is known regarding utilization of healthcare services and total cost of care before ACDF surgery in the United States.

METHODS

We analyzed a group of patients who received ACDF for radiculopathy during 2009-2011 using a healthcare database of over 20 million patients of all ages. Patients with fewer than two years of data prior to ACDF procedure were excluded. Inclusion criteria included patients with a diagnosis of disc displacement/degeneration and radiculopathy. All charges related to healthcare administration within two years prior to surgery were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen hundred seventy six patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three percent of patients were in the 40-59 year age range; 55% were women and 45% were men. In the two years preceding the surgery, 34% of patients received prescription NSAIDs, and 98% received prescription narcotics for total charges of $101,188 ($174.46/patient) and $222,860 ($134.82/patient) respectively. Total pain-related interventions over two years (oral pharmacotherapy and injections) were charged at $4,368,900 at an average of $2,606/treatment. Total outpatient charges including physician office visits, other outpatient visits and emergency room visits amounted to $25,450,012. Mean total outpatient charges over the two years preceding ACDF was $15,556 per patient for 26,397 episodes of care. Injectable corticosteroids were provided for 84.7% of patients and charges related to this treatment totaled $1,137 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In the two years prior to ACDF, healthcare resource utilization is extremely high. Given that these patients ultimately undergo surgical intervention, opportunities to reduce charges of conservative care exist.

摘要

目的

采用回顾性队列研究设计,评估诊断为神经根病的患者在颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)之前的医疗资源利用模式。

背景

ACDF与颈椎神经根病患者生活质量的改善相关。然而,在美国,关于ACDF手术前医疗服务的利用情况和护理总成本知之甚少。

方法

我们使用一个包含超过2000万各年龄段患者的医疗数据库,分析了一组在2009年至2011年期间因神经根病接受ACDF的患者。排除了在ACDF手术前数据少于两年的患者。纳入标准包括诊断为椎间盘移位/退变和神经根病的患者。记录并分析了手术前两年内与医疗管理相关的所有费用。

结果

1676名患者符合纳入标准。73%的患者年龄在40至59岁之间;55%为女性,45%为男性。在手术前两年,34%的患者接受了处方非甾体抗炎药治疗,98%的患者接受了处方麻醉药品治疗,总费用分别为101,188美元(每位患者174.46美元)和222,860美元(每位患者134.82美元)。两年内与疼痛相关的总干预措施(口服药物治疗和注射)费用为4,368,900美元,平均每次治疗2,606美元。包括医生门诊、其他门诊就诊和急诊就诊在内的门诊总费用为25,450,012美元。在ACDF手术前两年,每位患者的门诊平均总费用为15,556美元,共26,397次就诊。84.7%的患者接受了注射用皮质类固醇治疗,与此治疗相关的费用每位患者总计1,137美元。

结论

在ACDF手术前两年,医疗资源利用率极高。鉴于这些患者最终接受了手术干预,存在降低保守治疗费用的机会。