Suppr超能文献

接受腹股沟疝修补术患者的患者报告结局指标

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair.

作者信息

Gram-Hanssen Anders, Tolstrup Anders, Zetner Dennis, Rosenberg Jacob

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Center for Perioperative Optimization, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2020 Apr 16;7:17. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00017. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

There are many ways to determine the success of an inguinal hernia operation. Traditional measures are hernia recurrence, neuralgia, mesh infection, or rather the absence of these complications. While these traditional measures obviously have their merits, alternative outcomes are emerging, and researchers and clinicians are gaining an increasing interest in patient-reported outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are patient questionnaires concerning quality of life, chronic pain, disability, or other subjects that are best assessed by the patients. PROMs come in two different forms: generic and condition specific. The generic PROMs concern general symptoms and issues, while the condition-specific PROMs target patients with a certain condition. Inguinal hernia-specific PROMs typically address issues like mesh-related symptoms, groin pain, sexual dysfunction, etc. Clinical measurement instruments such as PROMs should be carefully validated according to standardized guidelines to ensure their psychometric measurement properties. Unfortunately, this type of evidence is often lacking when it comes to inguinal hernia-specific PROMs. In this review, we explain why PROMs are useful for patients with inguinal hernia and why one should use inguinal hernia-specific PROMs as opposed to the generic ones. We address the importance of population-specific validation and explain what type of evidence is lacking. Last, we discuss the future prospects of using PROMs for patients with inguinal hernia.

摘要

有多种方法可以确定腹股沟疝手术的成功与否。传统的衡量标准是疝复发、神经痛、补片感染,或者更确切地说是这些并发症的不存在。虽然这些传统标准显然有其优点,但其他结果也在不断出现,研究人员和临床医生对患者报告的结果及患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)越来越感兴趣。PROMs是关于生活质量、慢性疼痛、残疾或其他最好由患者评估的主题的患者问卷。PROMs有两种不同形式:通用型和疾病特异性型。通用型PROMs涉及一般症状和问题,而疾病特异性PROMs针对患有特定疾病的患者。腹股沟疝特异性PROMs通常涉及与补片相关的症状、腹股沟疼痛、性功能障碍等问题。像PROMs这样的临床测量工具应根据标准化指南进行仔细验证,以确保其心理测量特性。不幸的是,在腹股沟疝特异性PROMs方面往往缺乏这类证据。在本综述中,我们解释了为什么PROMs对腹股沟疝患者有用,以及为什么应该使用腹股沟疝特异性PROMs而不是通用型PROMs。我们阐述了针对特定人群进行验证的重要性,并解释了缺乏何种类型的证据。最后,我们讨论了将PROMs用于腹股沟疝患者的未来前景。

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Front Surg. 2020 Apr 16;7:17. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00017. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated: a systematic review.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa019.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1532-1540.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.012.
5
Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02322-3. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Combined open and laparoscopic approach to chronic pain following open inguinal hernia repair.
Hernia. 2006 Mar;10(1):20-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0032-8. Epub 2006 Feb 25.
10
Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

4
Impact of preoperative frailty status on decision regret following elective hernia repair.
Hernia. 2025 Jan 23;29(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03254-y.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Carolinas Comfort Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for inguinal hernia.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 16;409(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03445-2.
7
ENGINE-An EHS Project for Future Guidelines.
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jul 12;3:13007. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13007. eCollection 2024.
9
Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):24-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10545-5. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated: a systematic review.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa019.
2
Using Patient-reported Outcomes to Enhance Appropriateness in Low-risk Elective General Surgery.
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):41-42. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002864.
4
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
5
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
6
Quality of life of inguinal hernia patients in Taiwan: The application of the hernia-specific quality of life assessment instrument.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183138. eCollection 2017.
7
Do Patient-Reported Outcomes Correlate with Clinical Outcomes Following Surgery?
Adv Surg. 2017 Sep;51(1):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 May 13.
9
Appropriateness, Health Care Reform, and the Surgeon: Perspectives From the Surgical Outcomes Club.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Sep 1;152(9):813-814. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1572.
10
Translating Patient-Reported Outcomes From Surgical Research to Clinical Care.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Sep 1;152(9):811-812. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1583.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验