Hallam S, Bickley M, Phelan L, Dilworth M, Bowley D M
Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Jul;102(6):437-441. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0098. Epub 2020 May 6.
In the UK, general surgeons must demonstrate competency in emergency general surgery before obtaining a certificate of completion of training. Subsequently, many consultants develop focused elective specialist interests which may not mirror the breadth of procedures encountered during emergency practice. Recent National Emergency Laparotomy Audit analysis found that declared surgeon special interest impacted emergency laparotomy outcomes, which has implications for emergency general surgery service configuration. We sought to establish whether local declared surgeon special interest impacts emergency laparotomy outcomes.
Adult patients having emergency laparotomy were identified from our prospective National Emergency Laparotomy Audit database from May 2016 to May 2019 and categorised as colorectal or oesophagogastric according to operative procedure. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, return to theatre and length of stay. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify any association between declared consultant specialist interest and outcomes.
Of 600 laparotomies, 358 (58.6%) were classifiable as specialist procedures: 287 (80%) colorectal and 71 (20%) oesophagogastric. Discordance between declared specialty and operation undertaken occurred in 25% of procedures. For colorectal emergency laparotomy, there was an increased risk of 30-day mortality when performed by a non-colorectal consultant (unadjusted odds ratio 2.34; 95% confidence interval 1.10-5.00; = 0.003); however, when adjusted for confounders within multivariate analysis declared surgeon specialty had no impact on mortality, return to theatre or length of stay.
Surgeon-declared specialty does not impact emergency laparotomy outcomes in this cohort of undifferentiated emergency laparotomies. This may reflect the on-call structure at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, where a colorectal and oesophagogastric consultant are paired on call and provide cross-cover when needed.
在英国,普通外科医生在获得培训结业证书之前必须证明自己具备急诊普通外科手术能力。随后,许多顾问医生会发展出专注的择期专科兴趣,这可能无法反映急诊实践中所遇到的手术广度。最近的全国急诊剖腹手术审计分析发现,宣称的外科医生专科兴趣会影响急诊剖腹手术结果,这对急诊普通外科服务配置具有重要意义。我们试图确定当地宣称的外科医生专科兴趣是否会影响急诊剖腹手术结果。
从我们前瞻性的全国急诊剖腹手术审计数据库中识别出2016年5月至2019年5月期间接受急诊剖腹手术的成年患者,并根据手术程序将其分类为结直肠或食管胃手术。结果包括30天死亡率、重返手术室情况和住院时间。采用二项逻辑回归来确定宣称的顾问医生专科兴趣与结果之间的任何关联。
在600例剖腹手术中,358例(58.6%)可归类为专科手术:287例(80%)为结直肠手术,71例(20%)为食管胃手术。25%的手术存在宣称的专科与实际进行的手术不一致的情况。对于结直肠急诊剖腹手术,由非结直肠专科顾问医生进行时,30天死亡率风险增加(未调整比值比2.34;95%置信区间1.10 - 5.00;P = 0.003);然而,在多变量分析中对混杂因素进行调整后,宣称的外科医生专科对死亡率、重返手术室情况或住院时间没有影响。
在这组未分化的急诊剖腹手术中,外科医生宣称的专科不会影响急诊剖腹手术结果。这可能反映了伯明翰心脏地带医院的值班安排,即结直肠和食管胃专科顾问医生配对值班,并在需要时提供交叉支援。