Adelaide Dental School and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Dent Res. 2020 Jul;99(8):871-876. doi: 10.1177/0022034520919333. Epub 2020 May 6.
Limiting free sugars to <5% of energy intake is a World Health Organization evidence-based recommendation to protect oral health throughout the life course. Achieving this requires a concerted approach with upstream interventions, including legislation underpinning community interventions and health promotion. Global production and trade are the main drivers of sugars consumption, which can be addressed only through prioritization of health impacts in agricultural and trade agreements, including pricing and subsidies. Increasing evidence demonstrates the benefit, including dental benefits, of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages, a major source of sugars-with taxes based on sugars content being favored due to the dual impact in incentivizing consumers to buy less and encouraging producers to use less through product reformulation. A benefit of product reformulation is that the potential impact on sugars intake occurs independent of consumer behavior change, making the benefits more equitable across social groups. Evidence from meta-analysis indicates that sugars reformulation and portion size reduction could lower energy intake by more than 10% and 16%, respectively. Sophisticated and targeted digital marketing of products high in sugars is another key driver of sugars intake. With the exception of children's television broadcasting, marketing of products high in sugars is largely unregulated, and increased awareness of modern marketing strategies and more stringent regulation are urgently needed. To ensure a commercial level playing field, mandatory approaches are required. Midstream actions include creating healthier food environments in neighborhoods, community settings (schools, sports centers, hospitals), and workplaces. Only through coalition among authorities responsible for planning and health will "obesogenic and cariogenic" environments be replaced with those that make healthy choices the easiest choice. It is recognized that providing nutrition health education alone is insufficient to achieve necessary sugars reduction; however, education has a key role to play in changing social norms and creating drive for change.
将游离糖摄入量限制在总能量摄入的 5%以下,是世界卫生组织基于证据提出的建议,旨在保护全生命周期的口腔健康。要实现这一目标,需要采取综合性措施,包括实施上游干预措施,为社区干预措施和健康促进提供立法支持。全球的生产和贸易是推动糖消费的主要因素,只有在农业和贸易协定中优先考虑健康影响,包括对含糖饮料征税(基于含糖量的征税方式更可取,因为这种方式可以双重激励消费者减少购买量,并促使生产者通过产品配方改革减少使用量),才能解决这一问题。越来越多的证据表明,对含糖饮料征税具有益处,包括改善口腔健康,而基于含糖量的征税方式由于可以在不改变消费者行为的情况下对糖摄入量产生潜在影响,因此在社会群体中更为公平。荟萃分析的证据表明,产品配方改革和减少份量可以分别使糖摄入量减少 10%和 16%以上。对高糖产品进行复杂和有针对性的数字营销也是推动糖摄入量的另一个主要因素。除了儿童电视广播之外,对高糖产品的营销在很大程度上不受监管,迫切需要提高对现代营销策略的认识,并加强监管。为了确保公平竞争环境,需要采取强制性方法。中游行动包括在社区、社区环境(学校、体育中心、医院)和工作场所创造更健康的食品环境。只有负责规划和健康的当局联合起来,才能将“致肥胖和致龋”的环境转变为最有利于人们选择健康食品的环境。人们认识到,仅提供营养健康教育不足以实现必要的糖摄入量减少;然而,教育在改变社会规范和推动变革方面发挥着关键作用。