Zhang J N, Wang J, Peng H M, Ma M Y, Wang H, Zhao C C, Jiao M Y, Li X H, Yao Y Q
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;55(4):253-258. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200309-00198.
To investigate the effect of gonadotropin (Gn) on embryo aneuploidy rate and pregnancy outcome during preimplanptation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. The clinical data of patients undergoing PGT-A cycle at the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 1, 2013 to May 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into younger patient group (<35 years old) and elder patient group (≥35 years old) by maternal age, then divided into two groups in line with Gn dosage (≤2 250 U, >2 250 U), and into four groups by number of oocytes retrieved (1-5, 6-10, 11-15 and ≥16 oocytes). The embryo aneuploidy rate and pregnancy outcome between the groups were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between the cumulative amount of Gn, embryo aneuploidy rate and live-birth rate. A total of 402 cycles (338 patients) and 1 883 embryos were included in the study. (1) In the younger patients, the aneuploidy rate was 52.5% (304/579) in the group of Gn≤2 250 U and 48.6% (188/387) in the group of Gn2 250 U, with no significant difference between them (0.232). In the elderly patients, the difference in embryo aneuploidy rate between the two Gn group [57.9% (208/359) versus 60.6% (319/526)] was not statistically significant (0.420). (2) The embryonic aneuploidy rate in different protocol of ovary stimulation was analyzed,in the younger group, the embryonic aneuploidy rate in patients using antagonist long protocol was 50.3% (158/314), it was 50.0% (121/242) in agonist long protocol, 52.1% (207/397) in agonist short protocol and 6/13 in luteal phase protocol, no statistical difference was found in above groups (0.923); in the elder group, embryonic aneuploidy rate was 60.8% (191/314) in antagonist protocol, 58.4% (132/226) in agonist long protocol, 59.2%(199/336) in agonist short protocol, 5/9 in luteal phase protocol, respectively,no significant difference was found (0.938). (3) In the younger patients, the aneuploidy rate in 1-5 oocytes group, 6-10 oocytes group, 11-15 oocytes group and ≥16 oocytes group was 37.9% (11/29), 54.0% (94/174), 52.5% (104/198) and 50.1% (283/565) respectively, no significant difference was found between the groups (0.652); while in the elder patients, the difference between aneuploidy rate in each retrieved oocytes group [73.6% (89/121), 57.5% (119/207), 56.3% (108/192), 57.8% (211/365)] was statistically significant (0.046). (4) Logistic regression analysis of age, cumulative dosage of Gn, number of oocytes obtained, and embryo aneuploidy rate showed that there was no association between the amount of Gn and embryo aneuploidy rate (0.05); the increase in maternal age would increase the risk of aneuploidy rate of embryos, which was statistically significant (1.031, 95: 1.010-1.054, 0.004); the increase in oocytes retrived would significantly decrease the risk of aneuploidy (0.981, 95: 0.971-0.991, 0.01). (5) There was no significant difference in biochemical pregnancy rate [55.6% (80/144) versus 52.1% (63/121)], clinical pregnancy rate [50.0% (72/144) versus 47.9% (58/121)] and live-birth rate [46.5% (67/144) versus 40.5% (49/121)] between different Gn dosage groups (0.613, 0.738, 0.324). The logistic regression analysis showed that the maternal age, the cumulative dosage of Gn, the number of oocytes obtained, and the ovarian stimulation protocol had no effect on the live-birth rate (all 0.05). In PGT-A cycle, the dosage of Gn has no association with the embryo aneuploidy rate and pregnancy outcome. In the patients ≥35 years old, the increase in number of oocytes obtained may decrease the risk of aneuploidy. Age is an important factor affecting the embryo aneuploidy in PGT-A cycle.
探讨促性腺激素(Gn)在胚胎植入前非整倍体检测(PGT-A)周期中对胚胎非整倍体率及妊娠结局的影响。回顾性分析2013年1月1日至2019年5月31日在解放军总医院第一医学中心接受PGT-A周期治疗的患者的临床资料。根据产妇年龄将患者分为年轻患者组(<35岁)和年长患者组(≥35岁),再根据Gn剂量(≤2250 U,>2250 U)分为两组,根据获卵数(1-5、6-10、11-15和≥16个卵母细胞)分为四组。比较各组之间的胚胎非整倍体率及妊娠结局。采用逻辑回归分析Gn累积用量、胚胎非整倍体率与活产率之间的关系。本研究共纳入402个周期(338例患者)及1883枚胚胎。(1)在年轻患者中,Gn≤2250 U组的非整倍体率为52.5%(共304/579),Gn>2250 U组为48.6%(188/387),两组之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.232)。在年长患者中,两组Gn组间胚胎非整倍体率差异无统计学意义[57.9%(208/359)对60.6%(319/526),P=0.420]。(2)分析不同卵巢刺激方案中的胚胎非整倍体率,在年轻组中,使用拮抗剂长方案患者的胚胎非整倍体率为50.3%(158/314),激动剂长方案为50.0%(121/242),激动剂短方案为52.1%(207/397),黄体期方案为6/13,上述各组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.923);在年长组中,拮抗剂方案胚胎非整倍体率为60.8%(191/314),激动剂长方案为58.4%(132/226),激动剂短方案为59.2%(199/336),黄体期方案为5/9,差异无统计学意义(P=0.938)。(3)在年轻患者中,1-5个卵母细胞组、6-10个卵母细胞组、11-15个卵母细胞组及≥16个卵母细胞组的非整倍体率分别为37.9%(11/29)、54.0%(94/(174)、52.5%(104/198)和50.1%(283/565),组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.652);而在年长患者中,各获卵数组间非整倍体率差异有统计学意义[73.6%(89/121)、57.5%(119/207)、56.3%(108/192)、57.8%(211/365),P=0.046]。(4)对年龄、Gn累积用量、获卵数及胚胎非整倍体率进行逻辑回归分析,结果显示Gn用量与胚胎非整倍体率无关联(P=0.05);产妇年龄增加会增加胚胎非整倍体率的风险,差异有统计学意义(P=1.031,95%CI:1.010-1.054,P=0.004);获卵数增加会显著降低非整倍体风险(P=0.981,95%CI:0.971-0.991,P=0.01)。(5)不同Gn剂量组间生化妊娠率[55.6%(80/144)对52.1%(63/121)]、临床妊娠率[50.0%(72/144)对47.9%(58/121)]及活产率[46.5%((67/144)对40.5%(49/121)]差异无统计学意义(P=0.613、0.738、0.324)。逻辑回归分析显示,产妇年龄、Gn累积用量、获卵数及卵巢刺激方案对活产率均无影响(均P>0.05)。在PGT-A周期中,Gn用量与胚胎非整倍体率及妊娠结局无关联。在≥35岁的患者中,获卵数增加可能降低非整倍体风险。年龄是影响PGT-A周期胚胎非整倍体的重要因素。