• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“POP”评分系统用于预测急诊科妇产科疾病的开发:一项回顾性队列研究。

Development of the "POP" scoring system for predicting obstetric and gynecological diseases in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, 602-8026, Haruobicho 355-5, Kamigyo, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2020 May 6;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00332-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-020-00332-z
PMID:32375643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7203896/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstetric and gynecological (OBGY) diseases are among the most important differential diagnoses for young women with acute abdominal pain. However, there are few established clinical prediction rules for screening OBGY diseases in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to develop a prediction model for diagnosing OBGY diseases in the ED.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included female patients with acute abdominal pain who presented to our ED. We developed a logistic regression model for predicting OBGY diseases and assessed its diagnostic ability. This study included young female patients aged between 16 and 49 years who had abdominal pain and were examined at the ED between April 2017 and March 2018. Trauma patients and patients who were referred from other hospitals or from the OBGY department of our hospital were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 27,991 patients, 740 were included. Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with OBGY diseases (8.8%). The "POP" scoring system (past history of OBGY diseases + 1, no other symptoms + 1, and peritoneal irritation signs + 1) was developed. Cut-off values set between 0 and 1 points, sensitivity at 0.97, specificity at 0.39, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.1 (95% CI: 0.02-0.31) were considered to rule-out, while cut-off values set between 2 and 3 points, sensitivity at 0.23 (95% CI 0.13-0.33), specificity at 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 17.30 (95% CI: 7.88-37.99) were considered to rule-in.

CONCLUSIONS

Our "POP" scoring system may be useful for screening OBGY diseases in the ED. Further research is necessary to assess the predictive performance and external validity of different data sets.

摘要

背景

妇产科疾病是年轻女性急性腹痛最重要的鉴别诊断之一。然而,在急诊科(ED)中,用于筛查妇产科疾病的临床预测规则很少。本研究旨在建立一种用于诊断 ED 中妇产科疾病的预测模型。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了我院 ED 就诊的急性腹痛女性患者。我们建立了预测妇产科疾病的逻辑回归模型,并评估了其诊断能力。本研究纳入了年龄在 16 至 49 岁之间、有腹痛且在 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 3 月在 ED 接受检查的年轻女性患者。创伤患者和从其他医院或我院妇产科转来的患者被排除在外。

结果

在 27991 名患者中,纳入了 740 名患者。65 名患者被诊断为妇产科疾病(8.8%)。开发了“POP”评分系统(过去妇产科病史+1、无其他症状+1、腹膜刺激征+1)。将 0 至 1 分的切点值设为阴性预测值(NPV)为 0.97、特异性为 0.39、阴性似然比(LR-)为 0.1(95%CI:0.02-0.31),将 2 至 3 分的切点值设为阳性预测值(PPV)为 0.23(95%CI 0.13-0.33)、特异性为 0.99(95%CI 0.98-1.00)、阳性似然比(LR+)为 17.30(95%CI:7.88-37.99),以排除或纳入妇产科疾病。

结论

我们的“POP”评分系统可能有助于在 ED 中筛查妇产科疾病。需要进一步的研究来评估不同数据集的预测性能和外部有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/7203896/221838c534b2/12873_2020_332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/7203896/48c935f712a2/12873_2020_332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/7203896/221838c534b2/12873_2020_332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/7203896/48c935f712a2/12873_2020_332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/7203896/221838c534b2/12873_2020_332_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the "POP" scoring system for predicting obstetric and gynecological diseases in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.“POP”评分系统用于预测急诊科妇产科疾病的开发:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 May 6;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00332-z.
2
External validation of the POP score for predicting obstetric and gynecological diseases in the emergency department.用于预测急诊科妇产科疾病的POP评分的外部验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:348-353. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Diagnostic characteristics of S100A8/A9 in a multicenter study of patients with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain.多中心研究中急性右下腹痛患者 S100A8/A9 的诊断特征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01259.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科小儿急性阑尾炎病史、体格检查、实验室检查及床旁超声的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):523-551. doi: 10.1111/acem.13181.
5
Defining a clinical prediction rule to diagnose bacterial gastroenteritis requiring empirical antibiotics in an emergency department setting: A retrospective review.定义一个临床预测规则,以诊断在急诊科需要经验性抗生素治疗的细菌性胃肠炎:一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;42(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01304-w. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
[Differential abdominal pain diagnosis in gynecologic and obstetric general practice].[妇产科全科医疗中的腹痛鉴别诊断]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2004 Jan 21;93(4):103-13. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.93.4.103.
7
False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery.腹痛评估中的假阴性和假阳性错误:急性阑尾炎漏诊与不必要的手术。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;7(11):1244-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00470.x.
8
Pearls and pitfalls in the emergency department evaluation of abdominal pain.急诊科腹痛评估中的要点与陷阱
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003 Feb;21(1):61-72, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00080-9.
9
The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.白细胞计数及核左移在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802d1716.
10
History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Testing, and Emergency Department Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis.用于急性胆囊炎诊断的病史、体格检查、实验室检查及急诊科超声检查
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):281-297. doi: 10.1111/acem.13132.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of pelvic imaging for acute pelvic inflammatory disease in an emergency care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊环境中盆腔成像对急性盆腔炎的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acute Med Surg. 2022 Nov 9;9(1):e806. doi: 10.1002/ams2.806. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.二项逻辑预测模型的样本量:超越变量标准的事件数。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2455-2474. doi: 10.1177/0962280218784726. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015.日本急性胰腺炎管理指南:2015年日本指南
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):405-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.259. Epub 2015 May 13.
3
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 7;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
4
Triage using a self-assessment questionnaire to detect potentially life-threatening emergencies in gynecology.使用自我评估问卷进行分诊,以检测妇科潜在的危及生命的紧急情况。
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug 13;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-46. eCollection 2014.
5
Adnexal torsion: review of the literature.附件扭转:文献综述
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Is a standardized questionnaire useful for tubal rupture screening in patients with ectopic pregnancy?对于异位妊娠患者的输卵管破裂筛查,标准化问卷是否有用?
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01238.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Point-of-care ultrasonography.即时超声检查
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 24;364(8):749-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487.
8
Management of women referred to an acute gynecology unit: impact of an ultrasound-based model of care.转诊至急症妇科病房的女性管理:基于超声的护理模式的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;35(3):344-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7523.
9
Maternal adnexal torsion in pregnancy is associated with significant risk of recurrence.孕期附件扭转与复发的显著风险相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):551-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.05.003.
10
Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence.初潮后女性正常附件扭转及复发风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):355-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250969.15438.17.