Suppr超能文献

放射科医生和其他专家进行的经皮栓塞治疗的趋势。

Trends in Percutaneous Embolization Procedures by Radiologists and Other Specialists.

机构信息

Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107; HealthHelp, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):961-966. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate utilization trends in percutaneous embolization among radiologists and nonradiologist providers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2005-2016 were used to evaluate percutaneous embolization codes. Six codes describing embolization procedures were reviewed. Physician providers were grouped as radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, other surgeons, and all others.

RESULTS

The total volume of Medicare percutaneous embolization procedures increased from 20,262 in 2005 to 45,478 in 2016 (+125%). Radiologists performed 13,872 procedures in 2005 (68% of total volume) and 33,254 in 2016 (73% of total volume), a 140% increase in volume. While other specialists also increased the number of cases performed from 2005 to 2016, radiologists strongly predominated, performing 87% of arterial and 30% of venous procedures in 2016, more than any other single specialty. In 2014 and 2015, a sharp increase in venous embolization cases performed by nonradiologists preceded a sharp decrease in 2016, likely the result of complicated billing codes for venous procedures. Radiologists maintained a steady upward trend in the number of cases they performed during those years.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of percutaneous embolization procedures performed in the Medicare population increased from 2005 to 2016, reflecting a trend toward minimally invasive intervention. In 2016, radiologists performed nearly 10 times more arterial embolization procedures than the second highest specialty and more venous embolization procedures than any other single specialty.

摘要

目的

评估放射科医生和非放射科医生提供者在经皮栓塞治疗中的利用趋势。

材料和方法

使用 2005-2016 年全国医疗保险 B 部分按服务收费数据库评估经皮栓塞治疗代码。审查了描述栓塞程序的六个代码。将医师提供者分为放射科医生、血管外科医生、心脏病专家、肾病学家、其他外科医生和其他所有人。

结果

从 2005 年的 20262 例增加到 2016 年的 45478 例,医疗保险经皮栓塞治疗程序的总数增加了 125%。放射科医生在 2005 年进行了 13872 例手术(总手术量的 68%),在 2016 年进行了 33254 例手术(总手术量的 73%),手术量增加了 140%。虽然其他专家也从 2005 年到 2016 年增加了手术数量,但放射科医生占据了主导地位,在 2016 年完成了 87%的动脉栓塞治疗和 30%的静脉栓塞治疗,比任何其他单一专业都多。2014 年和 2015 年,非放射科医生进行的静脉栓塞治疗数量急剧增加,随后在 2016 年急剧下降,这可能是静脉治疗计费代码复杂的结果。放射科医生在这些年里保持了手术数量的稳定上升趋势。

结论

从 2005 年到 2016 年,医疗保险人群中进行的经皮栓塞治疗程序数量增加,反映了微创介入治疗的趋势。2016 年,放射科医生进行的动脉栓塞治疗手术数量是第二高专业的近 10 倍,进行的静脉栓塞治疗手术数量超过任何其他单一专业。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验