Demir Semra Tiryaki, Güven Dilek, Karapapak Murat, Uslu Hasan Sinan, Bülbül Ali, Türker İbrahim Çağrı, Şendül Selam Yekta, Dirim Burcu
Department of Ophthalmology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Neonatology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019 Aug 21;53(3):290-295. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.60465. eCollection 2019.
This study aims to evaluate the treatment modalities applied for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and to determine the efficacy and results of treatment modalities.
Premature babies, who needed treatment for ROP and followed-up in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our hospital or external centers, were retrospectively evaluated between January 2012 and January 2017. According to the criteria determined by the International ROP committee, the zones and stages of the cases were recorded. In this study, patients were evaluated in three groups. Group 1: plus disease with any stage in zone 1, group 2: plus disease in zone 2, together with stage 2 or 3, group 3: classified as aggressive posterior retinopathy (APROP). The birth weight, gestational age, treatment weeks and treatments that were administered were recorded. Regression in plus disease, macular dragging and retinal detachment did not develop were evaluated as successful treatment.
1746 preterm babies were examined. 65 (3.7%) preterm babies were included in this study, 31 female and 34 male. 126 eyes of preterm babies were intervened. The mean birth weight was 1159 (535-2200) grams, and the mean gestational age was 28.4±2.5 (24-34) weeks. Group 1 had 33 eyes (26.1%), group 2 had 71 eyes (56.3%), and group 3 had 22 eyes (17.4%). 94 eyes (74.6%) were treated once, 26 eyes (20.6%) were treated twice, 6 eyes (4.8%) received treatment three times. The first treatment was applied at 36±2.4 (32-41) weeks. The first treatment was performed with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in 75.8% of group 1 and 95.5% of group 3, and with diode laser photocoagulation (LPC) in 78.9% of group 2. There was a significant correlation between birth week and birth weight and first treatment week. Re-treatment was applied to 32,8% in LPC group and 19.2% in the IVB group due to recurrence. 5 eyes which were applied LPC+IVB did not need any re-treatment. Stage 4a retinal detachment developed in both eyes of 1 patient from group 1. Macular traction was developed in 2 eyes of 1 patient in group 2. After the treatments, success in 122 eyes (96.8%) was obtained.
ROP can be controlled by convenient and effective treatment. Although conventional LPC is still the first treatment option for ROP, IVB alone or combination with LPC is a highly effective treatment option for zone 1 disease and APROP. IVB reduces the number of ROP treatments.
本研究旨在评估用于早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的治疗方式,并确定治疗方式的疗效和结果。
对2012年1月至2017年1月期间在我院或外部中心的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)接受ROP治疗并随访的早产儿进行回顾性评估。根据国际ROP委员会确定的标准,记录病例的区域和阶段。本研究将患者分为三组。第1组:1区任何阶段的附加病变;第2组:2区的附加病变,以及2期或3期病变;第3组:归类为侵袭性后部视网膜病变(APROP)。记录出生体重、胎龄、治疗周数和所给予的治疗。附加病变的消退、黄斑牵拉和视网膜脱离未发生被评估为治疗成功。
检查了1746名早产儿。本研究纳入65名(3.7%)早产儿,其中31名女性,34名男性。对126只早产儿眼进行了干预。平均出生体重为1159(535 - 2200)克,平均胎龄为28.4±2.5(24 - 34)周。第1组有33只眼(26.1%),第2组有71只眼(56.3%),第3组有22只眼(17.4%)。94只眼(74.6%)接受了一次治疗,26只眼(20.6%)接受了两次治疗,6只眼(4.8%)接受了三次治疗。首次治疗在36±2.4(32 - 41)周进行。第1组75.8%和第3组95.5%的首次治疗采用玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗(IVB),第2组78.9%的首次治疗采用二极管激光光凝(LPC)。出生周数、出生体重与首次治疗周数之间存在显著相关性。由于复发,LPC组32.8%和IVB组19.2%的患者接受了再次治疗。5只接受LPC + IVB治疗的眼无需任何再次治疗。第1组1例患者的双眼发生了4a期视网膜脱离。第2组1例患者的2只眼发生了黄斑牵拉。治疗后,122只眼(96.8%)获得成功。
ROP可通过便捷有效的治疗得到控制。虽然传统的LPC仍然是ROP的首选治疗方法,但单独使用IVB或与LPC联合使用是治疗1区疾病和APROP的高效治疗选择。IVB减少了ROP的治疗次数。