• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学院入学考试成绩及自我评估材料与美国医师执照考试第一步成绩的相关性

Correlation of Medical College Admission Test Scores and Self-assessment Materials with the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance.

作者信息

Seal Zachary A, Koek Wouter, Sharma Ramaswamy

机构信息

Medical Education and Simulation, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):e7519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7519.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.7519
PMID:32377467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7198101/
Abstract

Purpose Candidates' performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination had been correlated with the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). However, in 2015, a new MCAT format was released and its correlation with Step 1 remains to be fully analyzed. Preparation for Step 1 typically involves purchasing and perusing practice tests from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and UWorld; however, their predictive value to performance on Step 1 remains to be ascertained, especially with the release of five new NBME practice tests. Additionally, there is a need for accurately predicting Step 1 scores to self-evaluate study progress and reduce student anxiety. Rationale Program directors rank USMLE Step 1 scores as the number one criterion in selecting interviewees for residency. Step 1 scores are more important than Step 2 scores, Dean's letter, or other letters of recommendation in determining the overall ranking of a candidate after interviews. Hypotheses The authors hypothesized that the new MCAT scores correlated positively with Step 1 scores and that the new NBME practice tests were more predictive of performance on Step 1 as compared to old NBME tests.  Methods Linear regression analysis followed by either analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student's t-tests were used to analyze 399 responses. Data obtained was used to update an existing Step 1 score predictor, which was then validated. Results A positive correlation between the MCAT (average score: 510.1 ± 6.3) and Step 1 scores (average score: 246.1 ± 14.2) was observed. While new NBME practice tests were more predictive of Step 1 scores than old NBME tests, UWorld test scores were the most predictive. Students who practiced with the new NBME practice tests scored significantly higher than students who did not use them. However, students using any of the UWorld practice tests did significantly better than students who practiced using only NBME practice tests but not UWorld practice tests. Ironically, NBME16,the second-most correlativetest to Step 1 performance, is no longer available for purchase. Overall, taking six or more practice tests significantly enhanced Step 1 scores; the optimal number of tests was found to be between six and nine. The predicted score by an updated Step 1 score predictor was within 3.8 points or 1.6% of the actual Step 1 score. Conclusions We believe this study will aid in the selection and purchase of appropriate self-assessment tests as preparatory material for the USMLE Step 1 examination. It will also introduce them to an existing Step 1 score predictor that will help determine their readiness for Step 1.

摘要

目的 美国执业医师资格考试(USMLE)第一步考试中考生的表现一直与医学院入学考试(MCAT)相关。然而,2015年发布了新的MCAT考试形式,其与第一步考试的相关性仍有待全面分析。第一步考试的备考通常包括从美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)和优思得(UWorld)购买并研读模拟试题;然而,它们对第一步考试表现的预测价值仍有待确定,尤其是在新发布了五套NBME模拟试题之后。此外,需要准确预测第一步考试成绩以自我评估学习进度并减轻学生焦虑。

理论依据 项目主任将USMLE第一步考试成绩列为选拔住院医师面试候选人的首要标准。在确定面试后候选人的综合排名时,第一步考试成绩比第二步考试成绩、院长推荐信或其他推荐信更重要。

假设 作者假设新的MCAT成绩与第一步考试成绩呈正相关,并且与旧的NBME考试相比,新的NBME模拟试题对第一步考试表现的预测性更强。

方法 采用线性回归分析,随后进行方差分析(ANOVA)或学生t检验来分析399份回复。所获得的数据用于更新现有的第一步考试成绩预测模型,然后对其进行验证。

结果 观察到MCAT(平均成绩:510.1±6.3)与第一步考试成绩(平均成绩:246.1±14.2)之间呈正相关。虽然新的NBME模拟试题比旧的NBME考试对第一步考试成绩的预测性更强,但优思得模拟试题的预测性最强。使用新的NBME模拟试题练习的学生得分显著高于未使用的学生。然而,使用任何优思得模拟试题的学生比仅使用NBME模拟试题而未使用优思得模拟试题练习的学生表现明显更好。具有讽刺意味的是,与第一步考试表现相关性第二高的NBME16已不再可供购买。总体而言,进行六次或更多次模拟试题练习显著提高了第一步考试成绩;发现最佳练习次数在六至九次之间。更新后的第一步考试成绩预测模型预测的分数与实际第一步考试成绩相差在3.8分以内或1.6%以内。

结论 我们相信这项研究将有助于选择和购买合适的自我评估测试题作为USMLE第一步考试的备考材料。它还将向考生介绍现有的第一步考试成绩预测模型,这将有助于确定他们对第一步考试的准备程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/3bc93abe4783/cureus-0012-00000007519-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/2dec8c46e1d0/cureus-0012-00000007519-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/037ee03dc2da/cureus-0012-00000007519-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/3bc93abe4783/cureus-0012-00000007519-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/2dec8c46e1d0/cureus-0012-00000007519-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/037ee03dc2da/cureus-0012-00000007519-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a58/7198101/3bc93abe4783/cureus-0012-00000007519-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of Medical College Admission Test Scores and Self-assessment Materials with the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance.医学院入学考试成绩及自我评估材料与美国医师执照考试第一步成绩的相关性
Cureus. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):e7519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7519.
2
Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.医学院临床实习表现的预测因素:标准化考试成绩与临床评估的多专业纵向分析
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 27;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0652-y.
3
A Predictive Model for USMLE Step 1 Scores.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)分数的预测模型。
Cureus. 2016 Sep 7;8(9):e769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.769.
4
NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship final examination scores: predictive value of standardized tests and demographic factors.美国国家医学考试委员会妇产科实习期末考核成绩:标准化考试及人口统计学因素的预测价值
J Reprod Med. 2004 Dec;49(12):978-82.
5
Formative Assessment in an Integrated Curriculum: Identifying At-Risk Students for Poor Performance on USMLE Step 1 Using NBME Custom Exam Questions.整合课程中的形成性评估:使用美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)定制考试题目识别在USMLE第一步考试中表现不佳的风险学生。
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S21-S25. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001914.
6
Factors that correlate with the U.S. Medical Licensure Examination Step-2 scores in a diverse medical student population.在多样化的医学生群体中,与美国医师执照考试第二步成绩相关的因素。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Sep;97(9):1258-62.
7
Resources That Improve Medical Board Licensing Examination Performance.提高医学委员会执照考试成绩的资源。
Cureus. 2019 Oct 16;11(10):e5927. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5927.
8
Predicting performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge using results from previous examinations.利用之前考试的结果预测美国医师执照考试第一步和第二步临床知识部分的表现。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Dec 14;9:943-949. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S180786. eCollection 2018.
9
Growth in basic science knowledge in first-year medical school and USMLE Step 1 results: a longitudinal investigation at one school.医学生第一年基础科学知识的增长与美国医师执照考试第 1 步成绩的关系:一所学校的纵向研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):605-619. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10104-y. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Pre-clerkship National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examinations Versus End-of-Semester Final Examinations: How Well Do They Assess Preparedness for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1?医学院预科阶段美国国家医学考试委员会科目考试与学期末期末考试对比:它们对美国医师执照考试第一步的准备情况评估得如何?
Cureus. 2022 Oct 20;14(10):e30523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30523. eCollection 2022 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Validity of Preclerkship Performance Metrics on USMLE Step 2 CK Outcomes in the Step 1 Pass/Fail Era.在第一步考试采用通过/失败制时代,临床实习前表现指标对美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识考试结果的预测效度。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Feb 25;16:323-330. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S505612. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical Students' Perceptions and Use of Formal and Informal Curriculum Resources.医学生对正式和非正式课程资源的认知与使用
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52454. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52454. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Student well-being during dedicated preparation for USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 exams.

本文引用的文献

1
Resources That Improve Medical Board Licensing Examination Performance.提高医学委员会执照考试成绩的资源。
Cureus. 2019 Oct 16;11(10):e5927. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5927.
2
A Study of the Validity of the New MCAT Exam.新 MCAT 考试有效性研究。
Acad Med. 2020 Mar;95(3):396-400. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003064.
3
The Validity of Scores From the New MCAT Exam in Predicting Student Performance: Results From a Multisite Study.新 MCAT 考试分数预测学生表现的有效性:多站点研究结果。
医学生备考 USMLE Step 1 和 COMLEX Level 1 考试期间的健康状况。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03055-2.
4
Medical licensing examinations in both Sweden and the US favor pharmacology over lifestyle.瑞典和美国的医学执照考试都更看重药理学而非生活方式。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jun 17;23:101453. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101453. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Acad Med. 2020 Mar;95(3):387-395. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002942.
4
The association between United States Medical Licensing Examination scores and clinical performance in medical students.美国医师执照考试成绩与医学生临床能力之间的关联。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Apr 26;10:209-216. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S192011. eCollection 2019.
5
Class-Wide Access to a Commercial Step 1 Question Bank During Preclinical Organ-Based Modules: A Pilot Project.临床前器官模块中对商业 Step 1 题库的全班访问:一个试点项目。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):486-490. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001861.
6
The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)和第二步临床知识考试(Step 2 CK)成绩与住院医师匹配专业及地点的关联。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1358579. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1358579.
7
Testing and evaluation: the present and future of the assessment of medical professionals.测试与评估:医学专业人员评估的现状与未来。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2017 Mar 1;41(1):149-153. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2017.
8
A Predictive Model for USMLE Step 1 Scores.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)分数的预测模型。
Cureus. 2016 Sep 7;8(9):e769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.769.
9
Do MCAT scores predict USMLE scores? An analysis on 5 years of medical student data.医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩能预测美国医师执照考试(USMLE)成绩吗?对五年医学生数据的分析。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 30;21:31795. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31795. eCollection 2016.
10
Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.医学院临床实习表现的预测因素:标准化考试成绩与临床评估的多专业纵向分析
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 27;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0652-y.