Defense Health Agency, San Antonio, Texas.
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2229-2236. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa091.
This study examined patterns of initial transdermal fentanyl (TDF) claims among US commercially insured patients and explored the risk of 30-day hospitalization among patients with and without prior opioid exposure necessary to produce tolerance.
A retrospective cohort study of initial outpatient TDF prescriptions.
A 10% random sample of commercially insured enrollees within the IQVIA Health Plan Claims Database (formerly known as PharMetrics Plus).
Individuals with a claim for TDF between 2007 and 2015.
The primary exposure was a new transdermal fentanyl claim, and the primary outcome was guideline concordance based on time and dose exposure.
Among the 24,770 patients in the cohort, 4,848 (20%) patients had sufficient time exposure to opioids before TDF. Among those with sufficient time exposure, 3,971 (82%) had adequate opioid exposure based on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert dosing guidance. Overall, 3,971 of the 24,770 (16%) patients received guideline-consistent TDF. An exploratory analysis of 30-day hospitalization after a TDF claim did not detect a difference in odds between guideline-consistent or -inconsistent groups when adjusted for variables known to influence the risk of opioid-induced respiratory depression.
A majority of patients met FDA opioid dose thresholds for TDF but had insufficient time exposure based on package insert recommendations for tolerance. Exploratory analysis did not detect a difference in odds for all-cause hospitalization or respiratory-related 30-day hospitalization between guideline-consistent or -inconsistent TDF claims. Prescribers should continue to adhere to FDA TDF labeling, although certain aspects of the labeling should be reevaluated or clarified.
本研究调查了美国商业保险患者中初始透皮芬太尼(TDF)索赔的模式,并探讨了有无耐受所需的先前阿片类药物暴露的患者在 30 天住院治疗中的风险。
一项初始门诊 TDF 处方的回顾性队列研究。
IQVIA 健康计划索赔数据库(前身为 PharMetrics Plus)中 10%的商业保险参保者的随机样本。
2007 年至 2015 年间有 TDF 索赔的个体。
主要暴露是新的透皮芬太尼索赔,主要结果是基于时间和剂量暴露的指南一致性。
在队列中的 24770 名患者中,4848 名(20%)患者在 TDF 之前有足够的时间暴露于阿片类药物。在有足够时间暴露的患者中,根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)包装说明书的剂量指导,3971 名(82%)患者有足够的阿片类药物暴露。总体而言,24770 名患者中的 3971 名(16%)患者接受了符合指南的 TDF。在调整已知影响阿片类药物引起呼吸抑制风险的变量后,对 TDF 索赔后 30 天住院治疗的可能性进行的探索性分析未发现指南一致或不一致组之间的差异。
大多数患者符合 FDA 对 TDF 的阿片类药物剂量阈值,但根据包装说明书推荐的耐受时间不足。探索性分析未发现指南一致或不一致的 TDF 索赔在全因住院或呼吸相关 30 天住院治疗的可能性之间存在差异。尽管 FDA TDF 标签的某些方面应重新评估或澄清,但处方医生应继续遵守 FDA TDF 标签。