• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

松鼠猴和帽猴对聚葡萄糖、麦芽糖和蔗糖的味觉偏好。

Taste preferences of squirrel monkeys and bonnet macaques for Polycose, maltose and sucrose.

作者信息

Sunderland G, Sclafani A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1988;43(6):685-90. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90364-2.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(88)90364-2
PMID:3237782
Abstract

The taste preferences of adult male squirrel monkeys and bonnet macaques for Polycose, maltose, and sucrose solutions were compared in 24 hr/day solution vs. water tests. Solution concentrations of 0.01 M, 0.05 M, 0.10 M, and 0.20 (Polycose) or 0.50 M (maltose and sucrose) were tested. The squirrel monkeys displayed a stronger preference for sucrose than for maltose or Polycose. In fact, at most concentrations tested, the squirrel monkeys did not consume more maltose or Polycose than water. The bonnet macaque monkeys, on the other hand, displayed preferences for maltose and Polycose that were as strong as their sucrose preference. Also, the bonnet macaques' maltose and Polycose preferences exceeded those of the squirrel monkeys. The two species did not reliably differ in their sucrose preferences. The results suggest that bonnet macaques, like rats, have taste receptors for starch-derived polysaccharides, whereas the squirrel monkeys, like humans, may lack such receptors. The taste preference profiles are consistent with the natural food preferences of the two monkey species.

摘要

在每天24小时的溶液与水测试中,比较了成年雄性松鼠猴和帽猴对聚葡萄糖、麦芽糖和蔗糖溶液的味觉偏好。测试了0.01 M、0.05 M、0.10 M和0.20 M(聚葡萄糖)或0.50 M(麦芽糖和蔗糖)的溶液浓度。松鼠猴对蔗糖的偏好比对麦芽糖或聚葡萄糖的偏好更强。事实上,在大多数测试浓度下,松鼠猴摄入的麦芽糖或聚葡萄糖并不比水多。另一方面,帽猴对麦芽糖和聚葡萄糖的偏好与它们对蔗糖的偏好一样强烈。此外,帽猴对麦芽糖和聚葡萄糖的偏好超过了松鼠猴。这两个物种在蔗糖偏好上没有可靠的差异。结果表明,帽猴像大鼠一样,具有淀粉衍生多糖的味觉受体,而松鼠猴像人类一样,可能缺乏这种受体。味觉偏好特征与这两种猴子的自然食物偏好一致。

相似文献

1
Taste preferences of squirrel monkeys and bonnet macaques for Polycose, maltose and sucrose.松鼠猴和帽猴对聚葡萄糖、麦芽糖和蔗糖的味觉偏好。
Physiol Behav. 1988;43(6):685-90. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90364-2.
2
Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences.多糖和糖类味觉偏好的物种差异。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):231-40. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80031-3.
3
Gustatory responsiveness to polycose in four species of nonhuman primates.四种非人类灵长类动物对多聚葡萄糖的味觉反应。
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Oct;27(10):1997-2011. doi: 10.1023/a:1012286719241.
4
Taste preference thresholds for Polycose, maltose, and sucrose in rats.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):181-5. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80024-6.
5
Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared.大鼠对碳水化合物的味觉偏好:葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糖、果糖和多糖的比较
Physiol Behav. 1987;40(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90097-7.
6
Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.大鼠多糖和糖类味觉的质性差异:一种双碳水化合物味觉模型
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80025-8.
7
Sex differences in polysaccharide and sugar preferences in rats.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):241-51. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80032-5.
8
Developmental changes in sugar and starch taste preferences in young rats.
Physiol Behav. 1990 Jul;48(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90252-y.
9
Sucrose to polycose preference shifts in rats: the role of taste, osmolality and the fructose moiety.大鼠中蔗糖至多糖偏好的转变:味觉、渗透压和果糖部分的作用。
Physiol Behav. 1991 Jun;49(6):1047-60. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90330-q.
10
Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.在接触这些糖类后,甜味“敏感”(C57BL/6J)和“次敏感”(129P3/J)小鼠对蔗糖和聚葡萄糖的偏好增强。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Apr 15;87(4):745-56. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Is sugar as sweet to the palate as seeds are appetizing to the belly? Taste responsiveness to five food-associated carbohydrates in zoo-housed white-faced sakis, Pithecia pithecia.糖对于口腔来说是否和种子对肚子一样有吸引力?动物园中饲养的白面卷尾猴对五种与食物相关的碳水化合物的味觉反应。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 31;18(10):e0292175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292175. eCollection 2023.
2
Flower-fruit dynamics, visitor-predator patterns and chemical preferences in the tropical bamboo, Melocanna baccifera.热带竹种——矢竹的花果动态、访花者-捕食者模式和化学偏好。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277341. eCollection 2022.
3
Taste responsiveness of Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) to five food-associated saccharides.
西非黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes verus)对五种与食物相关的糖类的味觉反应。
Primates. 2019 Jan;60(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s10329-018-0697-0. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.从食欲设定点到食欲:50年的摄食行为研究。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Aug 1;192:210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
5
Gustatory responsiveness to polycose in four species of nonhuman primates.四种非人类灵长类动物对多聚葡萄糖的味觉反应。
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Oct;27(10):1997-2011. doi: 10.1023/a:1012286719241.