• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃、肺和膀胱癌的淋巴结清扫数目不足的差异:归咎于外科医生、病理学家还是医院?

Variation in Adequate Lymph Node Yield for Gastric, Lung, and Bladder Cancer: Attributable to the Surgeon, Pathologist, or Hospital?

机构信息

Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4093-4106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08509-3. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-08509-3
PMID:32378089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Commission on Cancer recently released quality-of-care measures regarding adequate lymphadenectomy for colon, gastric, lung, and bladder cancer. There is currently little information regarding variation in adequate lymph node yield (ALNY) for gastric, lung, and bladder cancer.

METHODS

The New York State Cancer Registry and Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System were queried for stage I-III gastric, stage I-II lung, and stage II-III bladder cancer resections from 2004 to 2014. Hierarchical models assessed factors associated with ALNY (gastric ≥ 15; lung ≥ 10; bladder ≥ 2). Additionally, the proportions of variation attributable to surgeons, pathologists, and hospitals were estimated among Medicare patients.

RESULTS

Among 3716 gastric, 18,328 lung, and 1512 bladder cancer resections, there were low rates of ALNY (gastric = 53%, lung = 36%, bladder = 67%). When comparing 2004-2006 and 2012-2014, there was significant improvement in ALNY for gastric cancer (39% vs. 68%), but more modest improvement for lung (33% vs. 38%) and bladder (65% vs. 71%) cancer. Large provider-level variation existed for each organ system. After controlling for patient-level factors/variation, the majority of variation was attributable to hospitals (gastric: surgeon = 4%, pathologist = 2.8%, hospital = 40%; lung: surgeon = 13.8%, pathologist = 1.5%, hospital = 18.3%) for gastric and lung cancer. For bladder cancer, most of the variation was attributable to pathologists (surgeon = 3.3%, pathologist = 10.5%, hospital = 6.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

ALNY rates are low for gastric, lung, and bladder cancer, with only modest improvement over time for lung and bladder cancer. Given that the proportion of variation attributable to the surgeon, pathologist, and hospital is different for each organ system, future quality improvement initiatives should target the underlying causes, which vary by individual organ system.

摘要

背景

癌症委员会最近发布了有关结肠癌、胃癌、肺癌和膀胱癌充分淋巴结切除术的质量控制措施。目前关于胃癌、肺癌和膀胱癌充分淋巴结收获(ALNY)的变化信息很少。

方法

从 2004 年至 2014 年,纽约州癌症登记处和全州规划与研究合作系统查询了 I-III 期胃癌、I-II 期肺癌和 II-III 期膀胱癌切除术。分层模型评估了与 ALNY 相关的因素(胃≥15;肺≥10;膀胱≥2)。此外,还在医疗保险患者中估计了外科医生、病理学家和医院之间的差异比例。

结果

在 3716 例胃癌、18328 例肺癌和 1512 例膀胱癌切除术中,ALNY 率较低(胃癌=53%,肺癌=36%,膀胱癌=67%)。比较 2004-2006 年和 2012-2014 年,胃癌的 ALNY 有显著改善(39%比 68%),但肺癌(33%比 38%)和膀胱癌(65%比 71%)的改善较为温和。每个器官系统都存在较大的提供者水平差异。在控制患者水平因素/变异性后,大多数变异性归因于医院(胃癌:外科医生=4%,病理学家=2.8%,医院=40%;肺癌:外科医生=13.8%,病理学家=1.5%,医院=18.3%),而对于胃癌和肺癌。对于膀胱癌,大部分变异性归因于病理学家(外科医生=3.3%,病理学家=10.5%,医院=6.2%)。

结论

胃癌、肺癌和膀胱癌的 ALNY 率较低,肺癌和膀胱癌的时间仅略有改善。鉴于归因于外科医生、病理学家和医院的变异比例因每个器官系统而异,未来的质量改进举措应针对每个器官系统的潜在原因,这些原因各不相同。

相似文献

1
Variation in Adequate Lymph Node Yield for Gastric, Lung, and Bladder Cancer: Attributable to the Surgeon, Pathologist, or Hospital?胃、肺和膀胱癌的淋巴结清扫数目不足的差异:归咎于外科医生、病理学家还是医院?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4093-4106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08509-3. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Surgeon-, pathologist-, and hospital-level variation in suboptimal lymph node examination after colectomy: Compartmentalizing quality improvement strategies.结肠切除术后次优淋巴结检查在外科医生、病理学家和医院层面的差异:划分质量改进策略。
Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1299-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.029. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Reliability of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's Quality of Care Measures for Hospital and Surgeon Profiling.美国外科医师学会癌症委员会医院和外科医生概况质量护理措施的可靠性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Feb;224(2):180-190.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.053. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?结肠癌切除术后淋巴结评估的变化:患者、外科医生、病理学家还是医院?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1410-9. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
5
Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.医院对结肠癌切除术后的淋巴结检查率及生存率
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2149-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2149.
6
The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.癌症中心在使用淋巴结计数作为胃癌手术质量衡量标准时的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.678.
7
Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists.外科医生和病理学家所获取的胃癌患者胃周淋巴结数量与预后的比较。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Oct;28(5):511-518. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.05.06.
8
Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base.结肠癌中不同医院次优淋巴结清扫率及生存率的差异:来自国家癌症数据库的证据
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):674-683. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5551-2. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
Lymph Node Yield in Colon Cancer: Individuals Can Make the Difference.结肠癌的淋巴结获取量:个体因素至关重要。
Dig Surg. 2015;32(4):269-74. doi: 10.1159/000381863. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Using a Lymph Node Count Metric to Identify Underperforming Hospitals After Rectal Cancer Surgery.使用淋巴结计数指标识别直肠癌手术后表现不佳的医院。
J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgeon, Hospital, and Geographic Variation in Minimally Invasive Colectomy.外科医生、医院和微创结肠切除术的地理差异。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1109-1116. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002694.
2
Population-based study of outcomes following an initial acute diverticular abscess.基于人群的初始急性憩室炎脓肿治疗结局研究。
Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):467-476. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10982. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Carotid artery disease and periprocedural stroke risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的颈动脉疾病与围手术期卒中风险
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):145-151. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_13_17.
4
Surgeon-, pathologist-, and hospital-level variation in suboptimal lymph node examination after colectomy: Compartmentalizing quality improvement strategies.结肠切除术后次优淋巴结检查在外科医生、病理学家和医院层面的差异:划分质量改进策略。
Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1299-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.029. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base.结肠癌中不同医院次优淋巴结清扫率及生存率的差异:来自国家癌症数据库的证据
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):674-683. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5551-2. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.癌症中心在使用淋巴结计数作为胃癌手术质量衡量标准时的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.678.
7
Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?结肠癌切除术后淋巴结评估的变化:患者、外科医生、病理学家还是医院?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1410-9. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
8
Factors affecting number of lymph nodes harvested in colorectal cancer.影响结直肠癌淋巴结检出数的因素。
J Surg Res. 2011 Jun 15;168(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
9
A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.将埃利克斯豪泽共病测量法修改为一种使用行政数据的医院死亡点数系统。
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):626-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5.
10
Quality of pathology reporting impacts on lymph node yield in colon cancer.病理报告质量对结肠癌淋巴结获取量有影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 1;25(4):463; author reply 463-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2304.