Department of Gastroenterology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 11 Robin Warren Drive, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
Level 1, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, 11 Robin Warren Drive, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia, 6510, Australia.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04578-7. Epub 2020 May 6.
Several risk factors affecting post-operative recurrence in Crohn's disease patients have been studied, and of these, the role of the anastomosis remains contentious. We aimed to compare the risk of developing early post-operative endoscopic recurrence (EPER), in resections that had an end-to-end anastomosis (ETEA) to a side-to-side anastomosis (STSA).
All Crohn's disease patients that underwent an ileocolic or small bowel resection between January 2012 and June 2017 at two tertiary IBD centres were reviewed retrospectively. Included patients had a minimum of 12-month clinical follow-up and a colonoscopy within 12 months of the resection or stoma reversal. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses determined the independent risk factors for early post-operative endoscopic recurrence, defined as a Rutgeerts score of ≥ i2b.
Ninety-two resections associated with an ETEA or a STSA were included for analysis. The ETEA was the most common anastomosis, constructed in 55 patients (59.8%). Forty-nine operations (53.3%) resulted in a ≥ i2b recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy. The multivariate analysis showed that there was no difference between the ETEA and STSA in determining the odds ratio (OR) for developing EPER (OR = 2.41 (0.95-6.05), P = 0.06). In those that underwent a resection emergently however, the significant determinants of EPER were as follows: having an ETEA (OR = 38.12 (2.44-595.87), P = 0.01), failing to commence a biologic and/or an immunosuppressant early (OR = 24.21 (1.69, 347.81), P = 0.02), and active smoking (OR = 7.19 (1.12-46.21), P = 0.04).
The ETEA is best avoided in those undergoing an emergency resection. The early commencement of a biologic and/or an immunosuppressant and smoking cessation is imperative this high-risk group of patients.
已有多项研究探讨了影响克罗恩病患者术后复发的多种危险因素,其中吻合口的作用存在争议。我们旨在比较端对端吻合(ETEA)和侧侧吻合(STSA)在结直肠切除术后早期内镜复发(EPER)风险方面的差异。
回顾性分析 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间在两家三级 IBD 中心接受回肠结肠或小肠切除术的所有克罗恩病患者。纳入标准为至少有 12 个月的临床随访和在切除术后 12 个月内进行结肠镜检查或造口回纳术。单因素和多因素二元逻辑回归分析确定了早期内镜复发的独立危险因素,定义为 Rutgeerts 评分≥i2b。
共纳入 92 例接受 ETEA 或 STSA 吻合的患者。其中 ETEA 最常见,55 例(59.8%)采用该吻合方式。49 例(53.3%)手术在首次监测结肠镜检查时发生≥i2b 复发。多因素分析显示,在确定发生 EPER 的优势比(OR)方面,ETEA 和 STSA 之间无差异(OR=2.41(0.95-6.05),P=0.06)。然而,对于紧急手术的患者,EPER 的显著决定因素如下:采用 ETEA(OR=38.12(2.44-595.87),P=0.01)、未能早期开始使用生物制剂和/或免疫抑制剂(OR=24.21(1.69,347.81),P=0.02)以及吸烟(OR=7.19(1.12-46.21),P=0.04)。
对于紧急手术的患者,最好避免采用 ETEA。对于这一高危人群,早期开始使用生物制剂和/或免疫抑制剂并戒烟至关重要。