Suppr超能文献

医生网络与潜在不合理的阿片类药物处方。

Physician networks and potentially inappropriate opioid prescriptions.

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.

Social & Scientific Systems, A DLH Company, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):301-310. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1760655. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

Opioid overdose is a national health priority and curbing inappropriate prescribing is critical. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued appropriate prescribing guidelines. Examine associations between care networks defined by shared patients and problematic opioid prescribing. Analysis was at the provider-year level. Social network analysis (SNA) applied to the Medicaid MarketScan Research Database for the years 2010-2015 identified care communities, each community's level of integration (centralization), and each provider's integration (centrality). Nested multivariable logistic regressions controlling for patient mix and provider specialty simultaneously examined the risk of any (incident) and repeated (prevalent) inappropriate prescribing.: Four behaviors defined by the CDC guidelines were examined: (1) more than 90 days continuous supply of high-dose opioid analgesics for chronic pain, (2) overlapping opioid supplies, (3) overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, and (4) prescribing an extended release opioid for an acute pain diagnosis. Provider centrality was associated with reduced incidence of outcome (2) (OR: 0.95) and decreased prevalence of outcomes (1), (2), and (3). However, higher incidence (OR: 1.32) and prevalence (OR: 1.027) of outcome (4) were observed. Conversely, centralization associated with decreased incidence of (1) and (2) and lower prevalence of (1), (2), and (3). Greater provider integration is associated with a lower risk of a provider's patients repeatedly having potentially inappropriate prescription fills; however, the association with a provider having any potentially problematic prescription is more ambiguous.

摘要

阿片类药物过量是国家卫生重点,遏制不当处方至关重要。2016 年,疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发布了适当的处方指南。研究通过共享患者定义的护理网络与阿片类药物处方不当之间的关联。分析在提供者-年度水平上进行。2010-2015 年,对医疗补助市场扫描研究数据库(Medicaid MarketScan Research Database)进行的社会网络分析(SNA)确定了护理社区、每个社区的整合水平(集中化)以及每个提供者的整合(集中性)。嵌套多变量逻辑回归同时控制患者组合和提供者专业,研究了任何(新发)和重复(流行)不当处方的风险:研究了 CDC 指南定义的四种行为:(1)慢性疼痛的高剂量阿片类镇痛药连续供应超过 90 天,(2)重叠的阿片类药物供应,(3)重叠的阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物处方,以及(4)为急性疼痛诊断开具缓释阿片类药物。提供者的中心性与结果(2)的发生率降低(OR:0.95)和结果(1)、(2)和(3)的流行率降低有关。然而,观察到结果(4)的发生率(OR:1.32)和流行率(OR:1.027)增加。相反,集中化与(1)和(2)的发生率降低以及(1)、(2)和(3)的流行率降低有关。提供者整合度越高,提供者的患者重复出现潜在不当处方的风险越低;然而,与提供者存在任何潜在问题处方的关联更加模糊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验