• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生网络与潜在不合理的阿片类药物处方。

Physician networks and potentially inappropriate opioid prescriptions.

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.

Social & Scientific Systems, A DLH Company, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):301-310. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1760655. Epub 2020 May 7.

DOI:10.1080/10550887.2020.1760655
PMID:32378481
Abstract

Opioid overdose is a national health priority and curbing inappropriate prescribing is critical. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued appropriate prescribing guidelines. Examine associations between care networks defined by shared patients and problematic opioid prescribing. Analysis was at the provider-year level. Social network analysis (SNA) applied to the Medicaid MarketScan Research Database for the years 2010-2015 identified care communities, each community's level of integration (centralization), and each provider's integration (centrality). Nested multivariable logistic regressions controlling for patient mix and provider specialty simultaneously examined the risk of any (incident) and repeated (prevalent) inappropriate prescribing.: Four behaviors defined by the CDC guidelines were examined: (1) more than 90 days continuous supply of high-dose opioid analgesics for chronic pain, (2) overlapping opioid supplies, (3) overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, and (4) prescribing an extended release opioid for an acute pain diagnosis. Provider centrality was associated with reduced incidence of outcome (2) (OR: 0.95) and decreased prevalence of outcomes (1), (2), and (3). However, higher incidence (OR: 1.32) and prevalence (OR: 1.027) of outcome (4) were observed. Conversely, centralization associated with decreased incidence of (1) and (2) and lower prevalence of (1), (2), and (3). Greater provider integration is associated with a lower risk of a provider's patients repeatedly having potentially inappropriate prescription fills; however, the association with a provider having any potentially problematic prescription is more ambiguous.

摘要

阿片类药物过量是国家卫生重点,遏制不当处方至关重要。2016 年,疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发布了适当的处方指南。研究通过共享患者定义的护理网络与阿片类药物处方不当之间的关联。分析在提供者-年度水平上进行。2010-2015 年,对医疗补助市场扫描研究数据库(Medicaid MarketScan Research Database)进行的社会网络分析(SNA)确定了护理社区、每个社区的整合水平(集中化)以及每个提供者的整合(集中性)。嵌套多变量逻辑回归同时控制患者组合和提供者专业,研究了任何(新发)和重复(流行)不当处方的风险:研究了 CDC 指南定义的四种行为:(1)慢性疼痛的高剂量阿片类镇痛药连续供应超过 90 天,(2)重叠的阿片类药物供应,(3)重叠的阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物处方,以及(4)为急性疼痛诊断开具缓释阿片类药物。提供者的中心性与结果(2)的发生率降低(OR:0.95)和结果(1)、(2)和(3)的流行率降低有关。然而,观察到结果(4)的发生率(OR:1.32)和流行率(OR:1.027)增加。相反,集中化与(1)和(2)的发生率降低以及(1)、(2)和(3)的流行率降低有关。提供者整合度越高,提供者的患者重复出现潜在不当处方的风险越低;然而,与提供者存在任何潜在问题处方的关联更加模糊。

相似文献

1
Physician networks and potentially inappropriate opioid prescriptions.医生网络与潜在不合理的阿片类药物处方。
J Addict Dis. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):301-310. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1760655. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Prescription practices involving opioid analgesics among Americans with Medicaid, 2010.2010年美国医疗补助计划参保者中涉及阿片类镇痛药的处方开具情况。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Feb;26(1):182-98. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0009.
3
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
4
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
5
Changes in Initial Opioid Prescribing Practices After the 2016 Release of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.《2016 年美国疾病预防控制中心发布慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南后初始阿片类药物处方实践的变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16860.
6
Inappropriate opioid prescribing practices: A narrative review.不适当的阿片类药物处方实践:叙述性综述。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Aug 1;76(16):1231-1237. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz092.
7
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
8
Opioid Analgesics in Georgia Medicaid: Trends in Potential Inappropriate Prescribing Practices by Demographic Characteristics, 2009-2014.佐治亚州医疗补助计划中的阿片类镇痛药:2009 - 2014年按人口特征划分的潜在不适当处方行为趋势
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):886-894. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.9.886.
9
Opioid prescribing rates from the emergency department: Down but not out.急诊室开出的阿片类药物处方率:有所下降,但并未绝迹。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107636. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107636. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Opioid prescribing practices after posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯后路脊柱融合术后的阿片类药物处方实践。
Spine Deform. 2020 Oct;8(5):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00127-z. Epub 2020 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.