Strauss J S
Yale University School of Medicine.
Psychiatry. 1988 Nov;51(4):363-7. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1988.11024412.
In this initial discussion for Psychiatry's series of case studies, I will be emphasizing two special contributions that can be made by single case and small sample reports, which are exemplified by the McGlashan/Nayfack paper and by the Money/Lobato study that appeared in the February 1988 issue of Psychiatry. The first contribution provides a unique perspective on the significance of therapist orientation in influencing the course of a patient's disorder and life. The second illustrates the use of a small sample study for understanding complex processes determining the onset and evolution of disorder. The McGlashan/Nayfack report is one of those rare case histories in which we have the opportunity to see the completion of a life, extending our vision far beyond the usual therapeutic frame. The Money report exemplifies the way in which small sample reports can provide a powerful approach to making the detailed comparisons needed to clarify multidetermined processes.
在精神病学系列案例研究的开篇讨论中,我将着重阐述单病例和小样本报告所能做出的两项特殊贡献,这两项贡献分别以麦克格拉斯汉/奈法克的论文以及发表于1988年2月《精神病学》杂志上的莫尼/洛巴托的研究为例。第一项贡献为治疗师取向在影响患者疾病进程和生活方面的重要性提供了独特视角。第二项贡献则展示了如何运用小样本研究来理解决定疾病发作和演变的复杂过程。麦克格拉斯汉/奈法克的报告是那些罕见的病例史之一,在其中我们有机会见证一个生命的完整历程,将我们的视野拓展到远远超出常规治疗框架的范围。莫尼的报告则例证了小样本报告能够提供一种强有力的方法,用于进行详细比较以阐明多因素决定的过程。