• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜腺瘤切除术与开放性腺瘤切除术:一项对比研究。]

[Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus open adenomectomy: A comparative study.].

作者信息

Bergero Miguel Ángel, Álvarez Juan Manuel, Cruz Liyo Juan, Dourado Leandro, Menéndez Nicolás, Carlos David, Dipatto Fernando, Tirapegui Sebastián

机构信息

Sanatorio Privado San Gerónimo. Santa Fe. Argentina.

Clínica Colón. Mar del Plata. Buenos Aires. Argentina.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2020 May;73(4):268-273.

PMID:32379061
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The improvements in laparoscopic urological surgery have made laparoscopic adenomectomy (LA) possible in voluminous prostatic adenomas.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the results of the LA and compared them with results of the open adenomectomy (OA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comparative study of 41 patients undergoing LA [23 LA with Millin technique (LA-MT) and 21 with transvesical technique (LA-TV)] was conducted with 44 patients undergoing OL in prostate adenomas > 100 grams. Data were recorded prospectively, at three different institutions. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and complications results were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prostate volume was 165 (100-345) gr for LA versus 170 (100-328) gr for OA (p=0.669). Preoperative IPSS was 3 (0-3) and Q max. 7 (0-15) for LA against 2 (0-3) and 7 (0-15.3) for OA (p=0.296;p=0.316). There was no difference in surgical time (p=0.069) between both techniques. LA had less operative bleeding, 100 (10-1000) ml than OA, 500 (100-1000) ml (p=0.0001) and a shorter hospital stay, 3 (1-8) days against 3.5 (3-10) days (p=0.0001), postoperative IPSS was 1 (1-2) and Q max. 25 (17-45) for LA against 1 (1-3) and 25.5 (12-44) for OA (p=0889;p=836). There were no differences neither in transfusions requirements' nor complications.

CONCLUSION

LA presented similar short-term functional results with less operative bleeding and shorter hospitalization time than OA with similar prostate volumes resected.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜泌尿外科手术的进步使得腹腔镜腺瘤切除术(LA)能够用于治疗体积较大的前列腺腺瘤。

目的

本研究的目的是评估LA的结果,并将其与开放性腺瘤切除术(OA)的结果进行比较。

材料与方法

对41例行LA的患者[23例行Millin技术的LA(LA-MT)和21例行经膀胱技术的LA(LA-TV)]与44例前列腺腺瘤重量>100克的行开放性手术(OL)的患者进行了一项对比研究。数据在三个不同机构前瞻性记录。对术前、术中、术后及并发症结果进行评估。

结果

LA组前列腺体积为165(100 - 345)克,OA组为170(100 - 328)克(p = 0.669)。LA组术前国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)为3(0 - 3),最大尿流率(Q max)为7(0 - 15);OA组术前IPSS为2(0 - 3),Q max为7(0 - 15.3)(p = 0.296;p = 0.316)。两种技术在手术时间上无差异(p = 0.069)。LA的术中出血量为100(10 - 1000)毫升,少于OA的500(100 - 1000)毫升(p = 0.0001),住院时间更短,LA为3(1 - 8)天,OA为3.5(3 - 10)天(p = 0.0001),LA术后IPSS为1(1 - 2),Q max为25(17 - 45);OA术后IPSS为1(1 - 3),Q max为25.5(12 - 44)(p = 0.889;p = 0.836)。在输血需求和并发症方面均无差异。

结论

LA在切除相似前列腺体积时,与OA相比具有相似的短期功能结果,但术中出血更少,住院时间更短。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus open adenomectomy: A comparative study.].[腹腔镜腺瘤切除术与开放性腺瘤切除术:一项对比研究。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 May;73(4):268-273.
2
Prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open adenomectomy: Surgical and functional results.比较腹腔镜与开放性腺瘤切除术的前瞻性研究:手术及功能结果
Actas Urol Esp. 2017 Jan-Feb;41(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
[Millin adenomectomy in the era of laser enucleation: results in a series of 240 cases].激光剜除术时代的米林腺瘤切除术:240例系列病例结果
Prog Urol. 2014 May;24(6):379-89. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Laparoscopic adenomectomy: 10 years of experience.腹腔镜腺瘤切除术:10年经验
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;42(3):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
5
Transcapsular adenomectomy(Millin): a comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery.经包膜腺瘤切除术(米林手术):一项比较研究,腹膜外腹腔镜手术与开放手术对比
Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.017. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
6
"Knotless" laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy.“免打结”腹腔镜腹膜外腺瘤切除术
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Mar;39(2):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
[Laparoscopic adenomectomy: Evolution of the technique and results.].[腹腔镜腺瘤切除术:技术的演变与结果。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2017 Oct;70(8):695-706.
8
Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate.腹腔镜腺瘤切除术与前列腺橡皮擦激光剜除术的对比
World J Urol. 2015 May;33(5):691-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1476-1. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
9
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): pilot study on feasibility.腹腔镜腹膜外腺瘤切除术(米林手术):可行性初步研究
Eur Urol. 2004 Jan;45(1):103-9; discussion 109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.07.002.
10
[Comparative study between laparoscopic extraperitoneal and open adenomectomy].腹腔镜腹膜外与开放性腺瘤切除术的对比研究
Actas Urol Esp. 2012 Feb;36(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Dec 16.