U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1574 North 300 East, Chesterton, IN, 46304, USA.
Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, 915 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Water Res. 2020 Jul 1;178:115671. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115671. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contamination or the bacterial community interact in the sand-water interface. In this study, we take a three-tiered approach to explore the relationship between bacteria in sand, sediment, and overlying water at three shoreline sites and two associated rivers along an extended freshwater shoreline. Samples were collected over two years and analyzed for FIB, two microbial source tracking (MST) markers (Catellicoccus marimammalium, Gull2; Bacteroides HF183), and targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis. FIB was much higher in sand than in water at all three sites. Gull2 marker was abundant in shoreline sand and water while HF183 marker was mostly present in rivers. Overall bacterial communities were dissimilar between sand/sediment and water, indicating little interaction. Sediment composition was generally unfavorable to bacterial resuspension. Results show that FIB and MST markers were effective estimates of short-term conditions at these locations, and bacterial communities in sand and sediment reflected longer-term conditions. Findings are useful for locating contamination sources and targeting restoration by evaluating scope of shoreline degradation.
岸线沙滩中含有高浓度的粪便指示菌(FIB),这些菌可能会通过冲刷和再悬浮作用而重新悬浮到水柱中。已有研究探索了影响 FIB 这种沙滩-水通量的沿海过程,但对于污染微生物标志物或细菌群落如何在沙滩-水界面相互作用,人们知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们采用了三层方法来探索三个海岸地点的沙滩、沉积物和上覆水中的细菌,以及沿一条延长的淡水海岸线的两个相关河流之间的关系。在两年的时间里采集了样本,并对 FIB、两种微生物源追踪(MST)标志物(Catellicoccus marimammalium、Gull2;Bacteroides HF183)和靶向宏基因组 16S rRNA 基因分析进行了分析。在所有三个地点,沙滩中的 FIB 都远高于水中。Gull2 标志物在岸线沙滩和水中丰富,而 HF183 标志物主要存在于河流中。沙滩/沉积物和水中的总体细菌群落不同,表明相互作用很少。沉积物成分通常不利于细菌再悬浮。结果表明,FIB 和 MST 标志物是这些地点短期条件的有效估计值,而沙滩和沉积物中的细菌群落反映了长期条件。这些发现对于通过评估岸线退化的范围来定位污染来源和确定修复目标非常有用。