Davies Philippa, Reuber Markus, Grunewald Richard, Howell Stephen, Dickson Jon, Dennis Gary, Shanmugarajah Priya, Tsironis Theocharis, Brockington Alice
Neurology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Neurology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK; Academic Neurology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Seizure. 2020 Jul;79:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
On 24/04/2018, the United Kingdom (UK) Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) clarified previous policies by issuing a statement, that the use of sodium valproate is contraindicated in women of childbearing potential unless the conditions of a pregnancy prevention programme are met, and only if other treatments are ineffective or not tolerated. We evaluated the impact of this over the first year of implementation in a tertiary epilepsy centre.
Cross-sectional study of all women under active follow up, or newly referred, of childbearing age (16-55 years), taking valproate for the treatment of epilepsy, over 12 months from 01/05/2018.
We identified 125 cases, with 31 newly referred in response to MHRA regulations. 9.6% of patients did not attend their appointment, 35.2% had a learning disability (LD), which in 19.2% was sufficiently severe that they could not consent to a sexual relationship. Patients with LD prescribed valproate were significantly younger, and more likely to have a focal or uncharacterised epilepsy than patients without LD. In 46.4% of patients, MHRA regulations were followed: women were already using highly active contraception (HAC), HAC was started, or valproate withdrawn. In 24.8% of cases, women elected to continue valproate, and were not willing to use HAC.
In 53.6% of cases, MHRA regulations contraindicating the use valproate in women of childbearing potential could not be followed fully, due to lack of patient attendance, lack of applicability in severe LD, or ethical concerns relating to patient choice.
2018年4月24日,英国药品和医疗产品监管局(MHRA)发布声明澄清先前政策,指出除非满足预防妊娠计划的条件,且只有在其他治疗无效或无法耐受时,育龄期女性才可以使用丙戊酸钠。我们评估了这一政策在一家三级癫痫中心实施的第一年所产生的影响。
对2018年5月1日起12个月内所有正在接受积极随访或新转诊的、年龄在16至55岁之间、正在服用丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的育龄期女性进行横断面研究。
我们共识别出125例病例,其中31例是因MHRA规定而新转诊的。9.6%的患者未赴约就诊,35.2%的患者有学习障碍(LD),其中19.2%的患者病情严重到无法同意发生性关系。与无LD的患者相比,服用丙戊酸钠的LD患者明显更年轻,且更有可能患有局灶性或未分类的癫痫。46.4%的患者遵守了MHRA规定:女性已在使用高效避孕措施(HAC)、开始使用HAC或停用丙戊酸钠。在24.8%的病例中,女性选择继续使用丙戊酸钠,且不愿意使用HAC。
在53.6%的病例中,由于患者未就诊、在严重LD患者中不适用或与患者选择相关的伦理问题,无法完全遵守MHRA关于育龄期女性禁用丙戊酸钠的规定。