Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14, Houenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0006 Japan.
Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jun;132:159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 May 5.
Second-line chemotherapy (SLC) improves survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients receiving SLC are categorized into two disease status groups: tumour progression after first-line chemotherapy and early recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy. Differences between these groups have not yet been clarified.
A total of 163 eligible patients registered in the randomized phase III TRICS trial evaluating SLC for patients with AGC was classified into the progressive disease (PD) group (n = 55) or the early relapse (ER) group (n = 108). We compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Adjusted OS and adjusted PFS were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
The ER group had a lower median age than the PD group (66 vs. 72 years; P = 0.016), performance status (PS) 0 was more frequently seen in the ER group (87% vs. 71%; P = 0.012). The adjusted median OS was 13.7 months in the ER group and 13.6 months in the PD group (IPTW hazard ratio [HR]: 1.023; P = 0.854). The adjusted median PFS was 4.9 months in the ER group and 4.4 months in the PD group (IPTW HR: 0.707; P = 0.004). ORR was significantly better in the ER group than the PD group (21.3% vs. 4.9%; P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events.
ER was associated with improved PFS and better ORR than PD, although no difference in survival was demonstrated. From the viewpoint of treatment outcome, it seems appropriate to treat patients with ER in the same way as patients with PD.
UMIN 000002571.
二线化疗(SLC)可改善晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的生存。接受 SLC 的患者分为两种疾病状态组:一线化疗后肿瘤进展和辅助化疗后早期复发。这些组之间的差异尚未阐明。
在评估 SLC 用于 AGC 患者的 III 期随机 TRICS 试验中,共有 163 名符合条件的患者被归入进展性疾病(PD)组(n=55)或早期复发(ER)组(n=108)。我们比较了总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)和安全性。使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)估计调整后的 OS 和调整后的 PFS。
ER 组的中位年龄低于 PD 组(66 岁 vs. 72 岁;P=0.016),ER 组的 PS 0 更为常见(87% vs. 71%;P=0.012)。ER 组的中位调整 OS 为 13.7 个月,PD 组为 13.6 个月(IPTW 风险比[HR]:1.023;P=0.854)。ER 组的中位调整 PFS 为 4.9 个月,PD 组为 4.4 个月(IPTW HR:0.707;P=0.004)。ER 组的 ORR 明显优于 PD 组(21.3% vs. 4.9%;P=0.020)。不良事件的发生率无显著差异。
ER 与 PD 相比,PFS 改善和 ORR 更好,尽管生存无差异。从治疗结果的角度来看,将 ER 患者与 PD 患者同等治疗似乎是合理的。
UMIN 000002571。