Suppr超能文献

HPV 16 基因甲基化联合 E6 癌蛋白在宫颈癌筛查中的风险分层:一项 10 年前瞻性队列研究。

Risk stratification of HPV 16 DNA methylation combined with E6 oncoprotein in cervical cancer screening: a 10-year prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 South Panjiayuan Lane, P.O. Box 2258, Beijing, 100021, China.

Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Clin Epigenetics. 2020 May 7;12(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00853-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

How to best triage human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women remains controversial in an era of HPV primary screening of cervical cancer. Here, we assessed the long-term risk stratification for triaging HPV 16 positive women by standalone HPV 16 methylation and combined with E6 oncoprotein.

METHODS

A total of 1742 women underwent screening with HPV DNA testing, cytology, and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in 2005 and were followed for 10 years. Seventy-seven women with HPV 16 positivity determined by HPV genotyping test were examined via E6 oncoprotein detection and bisulfite pyrosequencing for quantitative methylation of L1 and LCR genes of HPV 16.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or severe (CIN3+) for HPV 16 positive women was 25.3% (95% CI 14.7-37.3%), which significantly increased in women with high methylation at six sites (CpG 5602, 6650, 7034, 7461, 31, and 37) and in women with positive E6 oncoprotein. A methylation panel based on the above six sites showed a competitive risk stratification compared to cytology (HR 11.5 vs. 8.1), with a higher 10-year CIR of CIN3+ in panel positives (57.2% vs 36.8%) and comparable low risk in panel negatives (5.7% vs 4.8%).The sensitivity and specificity for accumulative CIN3+ was 85.7% (95%CI 60.1-96.0%) and 78.4% (95%CI 62.8-88.6%) for a methylation panel and 57.1% (95%CI 32.6-78.6%) and 86.5% (95%CI 72.0-94.1%) for E6 oncoprotein. The AUC values of methylation standalone and the co-testing of methylation panel and E6 oncoprotein were around 0.80, comparable to 0.68 for cytology, 0.65 for viral load, and superior to 0.52 for VIA (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated the promising use of HPV 16 methylation alone or combined with E6 oncoprotein for triaging HPV 16 positive women based on the long-term risk stratification ability.

摘要

背景

在 HPV 用于宫颈癌初筛的时代,如何对 HPV 阳性女性进行最佳的分流仍然存在争议。在这里,我们评估了单独的 HPV 16 甲基化和结合 E6 癌蛋白对 HPV 16 阳性女性进行长期风险分层的效果。

方法

2005 年,1742 名女性接受了 HPV DNA 检测、细胞学和醋酸视觉检查(VIA)筛查,并随访了 10 年。77 名 HPV 16 阳性的女性通过 HPV 基因分型检测,通过 E6 癌蛋白检测和 HPV 16 的 L1 和 LCR 基因的亚硫酸氢盐焦磷酸测序进行定量甲基化分析。

结果

HPV 16 阳性女性 10 年累积宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级或重度(CIN3+)的累积发病率(CIR)为 25.3%(95%CI 14.7-37.3%),在六甲基化位点(CpG5602、6650、7034、7461、31 和 37)高甲基化的女性和 E6 癌蛋白阳性的女性中显著增加。基于上述六个位点的甲基化面板与细胞学相比显示出竞争性风险分层(HR 11.5 vs. 8.1),在面板阳性的女性中,CIN3+的 10 年 CIR 更高(57.2% vs. 36.8%),而在面板阴性的女性中风险较低(5.7% vs. 4.8%)。对于累积性 CIN3+,甲基化面板的敏感性和特异性分别为 85.7%(95%CI 60.1-96.0%)和 78.4%(95%CI 62.8-88.6%),E6 癌蛋白分别为 57.1%(95%CI 32.6-78.6%)和 86.5%(95%CI 72.0-94.1%)。甲基化独立和甲基化面板与 E6 癌蛋白联合检测的 AUC 值约为 0.80,与细胞学的 0.68、病毒载量的 0.65相当,优于 VIA 的 0.52(p < 0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,HPV 16 甲基化单独或与 E6 癌蛋白联合用于 HPV 16 阳性女性的长期风险分层具有很大的应用潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/7204324/bcc235784a35/13148_2020_853_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验