FuWai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
XuanWu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Heart. 2020 Aug;106(16):1228-1235. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316586. Epub 2020 May 7.
OBJECTIVE: Whether lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a predictor for recurrent cardiovascular events (RCVEs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been established. This study, hence, aimed to examine the potential impact of Lp(a) on RCVEs in a real-world, large cohort of patients with the first cardiovascular event (CVE). METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective study, 7562 patients with angiography-diagnosed CAD who had experienced a first CVE were consecutively enrolled. Lp(a) concentrations of all subjects were measured at admission and the participants were categorised according to Lp(a) tertiles. All patients were followed-up for the occurrence of RCVEs including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 61.45±19.57 months, 680 (9.0%) RCVEs occurred. The results showed that events group had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than non-events group (20.58 vs 14.95 mg/dL, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that Lp(a) tertile 2 (p=0.001) and tertile 3 (p<0.001) groups had significantly lower cumulative event-free survival rates compared with tertile 1 group. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis further revealed that Lp(a) was independently associated with RCVEs risk (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.80, p<0.001). Moreover, adding Lp(a) to the SMART risk score model led to a slight but significant improvement in C-statistic (∆C-statistic: 0.018 (95% CI: 0.011 to 0.034), p=0.002), net reclassification (6.8%, 95% CI: 0.5% to 10.9%, p=0.040) and integrated discrimination (0.3%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 0.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating Lp(a) concentration was indeed a useful predictor for the risk of RCVEs in real-world treated patients with CAD, providing additional information concerning the future clinical application of Lp(a).
目的:脂蛋白(a)(Lp(a))是否可预测冠心病(CAD)患者的复发性心血管事件(RCVEs)尚未确定。因此,本研究旨在检查 Lp(a) 在首次心血管事件(CVE)后,真实世界中大量 CAD 患者的 RCVEs 中的潜在影响。
方法:在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,连续纳入了 7562 名经血管造影诊断为 CAD 且经历首次 CVE 的患者。所有受试者入院时均测量 Lp(a) 浓度,并根据 Lp(a) 三分位进行分组。所有患者均进行随访,以观察 RCVEs 的发生情况,包括心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和卒中。
结果:在平均 61.45±19.57 个月的随访期间,发生了 680 例(9.0%)RCVEs。结果显示,事件组的 Lp(a) 水平明显高于非事件组(20.58 比 14.95 mg/dL,p<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,与 Lp(a) 三分位 1 组相比,Lp(a) 三分位 2(p=0.001)和三分位 3(p<0.001)组的累积无事件生存率显著降低。此外,多变量 Cox 回归分析进一步表明,Lp(a) 与 RCVEs 风险独立相关(HR:2.01,95%CI:1.44 至 2.80,p<0.001)。此外,将 Lp(a) 添加到 SMART 风险评分模型中,C 统计量略有但显著提高(ΔC 统计量:0.018(95%CI:0.011 至 0.034),p=0.002),净重新分类(6.8%,95%CI:0.5%至 10.9%,p=0.040)和综合判别力(0.3%,95%CI:0.1%至 0.7%,p<0.001)。
结论:循环 Lp(a) 浓度确实是真实世界中接受治疗的 CAD 患者 RCVEs 风险的有用预测指标,为 Lp(a) 的未来临床应用提供了额外的信息。
J Transl Int Med. 2024-10-1
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024-5
Lipids Health Dis. 2022-11-14