Harris Joshua D, Mather Richard C, Nho Shane J, Salvo John P, Stubbs Allston J, Van Thiel Geoffrey S, Wolff Andrew B, Christoforetti John J, Ellis Thomas J, Matsuda Dean K, Kivlan Benjamin R, Carreira Dominic S
Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center Suite 2500, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Duke University, DukeHealth, James R. Urbaniak, MD Sports Sciences Institute, 3475 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Dec 12;7(1):77-84. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnz062. eCollection 2020 Jan.
The aim of this study was to determine (i) the reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons and (ii) the magnitude of hip flexion change with posterior pelvic tilt. Five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons (5-18 years of hip surgery experience) performed passive hip range of motion (internal and external rotation), flexion (contralateral hip extended) and flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (contralateral hip maximally flexed) on five young healthy asymptomatic volunteers (three males, two females; 34.4 ± 10.7 years of age). Motion was measured via digital photography and goniometry. Inter-observer reliability was calculated via two-way mixed, single measures, intra-class correlation coefficient. Paired -test was utilized to compare hip flexion (with contralateral hip extended) to hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (with contralateral hip in forced flexion). The reliabilities of measurements of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation were excellent, that of hip flexion was fair, and that of hip internal rotation was poor. The magnitude of hip flexion increase with posterior pelvic tilt was 17.0° ± 3.0° ( < 0.001). The reliability of hip range of motion measurement by five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons was excellent for measures of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation. Contralateral maximal hip flexion significantly increased ipsilateral hip flexion (approximately 17°). Diagnostic, level III (without consistently applied reference standard).
(i)经验丰富的髋关节镜下保髋手术医生测量髋关节活动范围的可靠性;(ii)后倾骨盆时髋关节屈曲变化的幅度。五位经验丰富的髋关节镜下保髋手术医生(有5 - 18年髋关节手术经验)对五名年轻健康无症状志愿者(三名男性,两名女性;年龄34.4±10.7岁)进行了被动髋关节活动范围(内旋和外旋)、屈曲(对侧髋关节伸展)以及后倾骨盆时的屈曲(对侧髋关节最大程度屈曲)测量。通过数码摄影和量角器测量活动情况。通过双向混合单测量类内相关系数计算观察者间信度。采用配对t检验比较髋关节屈曲(对侧髋关节伸展)与后倾骨盆时的髋关节屈曲(对侧髋关节强制屈曲)。后倾骨盆时髋关节屈曲和外旋测量的信度极佳,髋关节屈曲测量的信度尚可,髋关节内旋测量的信度较差。后倾骨盆时髋关节屈曲增加的幅度为17.0°±3.0°(P<0.001)。五位经验丰富的髋关节镜下保髋手术医生测量髋关节活动范围的信度,对于后倾骨盆时髋关节屈曲和外旋测量极佳。对侧髋关节最大程度屈曲显著增加同侧髋关节屈曲(约17°)。诊断性研究,III级(无一致应用的参考标准)。