May Caitlin J, Piepkorn Michael W, Knezevich Stevan R, Elder David E, Barnhill Raymond L, Lee Annie C, Flores Martiniano J, Kerr Kathleen F, Reisch Lisa M, Elmore Joann G
Dermatopathology Northwest, Bellevue, Washington, USA.
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Cutan Pathol. 2020 Oct;47(10):896-902. doi: 10.1111/cup.13736. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Melanocytic tumors are often challenging and constitute almost one in four skin biopsies. Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies may assist diagnosis; however, indications for their use are not standardized.
A test set of 240 skin biopsies of melanocytic tumors was examined by 187 pathologists from 10 US states, interpreting 48 cases in Phase I and either 36 or 48 cases in Phase II. Participant and diagnosis characteristics were compared between those who reported they would have ordered, or who would have not ordered IHC on individual cases. Intraobserver analysis examined consistency in the intent to order when pathologists interpreted the same cases on two occasions.
Of 187 participants interpreting 48 cases each, 21 (11%) did not request IHC tests for any case, 85 (45%) requested testing for 1 to 6 cases, and 81 (43%) requested testing for ≥6 cases. Of 240 cases, 229 had at least one participant requesting testing. Only 2 out of 240 cases had more than 50% of participants requesting testing. Increased utilization of testing was associated with younger age of pathologist, board-certification in dermatopathology, low confidence in diagnosis, and lesions in intermediate MPATH-Dx classes 2 to 4. The median intraobserver concordance for requesting tests among 72 participants interpreting the same 48 cases in Phases I and II was 81% (IQR 73%-90%) and the median Kappa statistic was 0.20 (IQR 0.00, 0.39).
Substantial variability exists among pathologists in utilizing IHC.
黑素细胞肿瘤的诊断通常具有挑战性,几乎占皮肤活检病例的四分之一。免疫组织化学(IHC)研究可能有助于诊断;然而,其使用指征尚未标准化。
来自美国10个州的187名病理学家对240例黑素细胞肿瘤皮肤活检样本进行了检测,第一阶段解读48例,第二阶段解读36例或48例。比较了报告称会对个别病例进行免疫组化检测或不进行免疫组化检测的参与者及其诊断特征。观察者内分析检查了病理学家在两次解读同一病例时订购检测的意图的一致性。
在187名参与者中,每人解读48例病例,其中21人(11%)未对任何病例进行免疫组化检测,85人(45%)对1至6例病例进行检测,81人(43%)对≥6例病例进行检测。在240例病例中,229例至少有一名参与者要求进行检测。240例病例中只有2例有超过50%的参与者要求进行检测。检测使用率的增加与病理学家年龄较小、具有皮肤病理学委员会认证、诊断信心低以及MPATH-Dx中间类别2至4中的病变有关。在第一阶段和第二阶段解读相同48例病例的72名参与者中,要求检测的观察者内一致性中位数为81%(四分位间距73%-90%),Kappa统计量中位数为0.20(四分位间距0.00,0.39)。
病理学家在使用免疫组化方面存在很大差异。