Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232691. eCollection 2020.
Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used, the current status and trend in its training have yet to be fully evaluated. We aimed to investigate how ESD endoscopists have been trained in actual clinical practice.
Endoscopists aged <45 years who have completed a gastroenterology fellowship or were currently in a fellowship for ≥2 years were included. We conducted a nationwide survey on the ESD training experiences of these endoscopists.
Among 79 young Korean endoscopists invited to participate in the survey, 68 (86.1%) trained in 24 major hospitals responded to the questionnaire. Twenty, 25, and 23 participants belonged to the second-year fellow, <5 years after training, and ≥5 years after training groups, respectively. Sixty-nine percent of the participants observed ≥50 ESD cases before starting ESD under supervision by an expert endoscopist. Additionally, 22% experienced ≥20 supervised ESDs during the training period. The proportion of the participants who underwent a hands-on course differed among the groups (≥5 years after training, 13.0%; <5 years after training, 40.0%; and second-year fellow, 50.0%; P = 0.027). ESD under supervision, observation, and hands-on course were the preferred methods for learning ESD (91.1%, 80.9%, and 35.3%, respectively). Overall, 42.6% of the participants were satisfied with their training program. More experience in supervised ESD (≥20 cases) was associated with an increased satisfaction (odds ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-36.31).
Observation and performance of ESD under the supervision of an expert endoscopist are the primary methods for learning ESD. Hands-on course program has been used more frequently in recent years.
尽管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)已被广泛应用,但目前对其培训的现状和趋势尚未进行全面评估。我们旨在研究内镜医师在实际临床实践中是如何接受 ESD 培训的。
纳入年龄<45 岁、已完成胃肠病学专科培训或正在进行≥2 年专科培训的内镜医师。我们对这些内镜医师的 ESD 培训经历进行了一项全国性调查。
在受邀参加调查的 79 名韩国年轻内镜医师中,有 68 名(86.1%)在 24 家主要医院接受过培训的内镜医师对问卷做出了回应。20 名、25 名和 23 名参与者分别属于第二年研究员、培训后<5 年和培训后≥5 年组。69%的参与者在由专家内镜医师监督下观察了≥50 例 ESD 病例后才开始独立进行 ESD。此外,在培训期间,有 22%的参与者经历了≥20 例监督下的 ESD。参加动手课程的参与者比例在不同组之间存在差异(培训后≥5 年组,13.0%;培训后<5 年组,40.0%;第二年研究员组,50.0%;P=0.027)。在监督下进行 ESD、观察和动手课程是学习 ESD 的首选方法(分别为 91.1%、80.9%和 35.3%)。总的来说,42.6%的参与者对他们的培训计划感到满意。更多的监督下 ESD 经验(≥20 例)与满意度增加相关(比值比,6.65;95%置信区间,1.62-36.31)。
在专家内镜医师的监督下观察和进行 ESD 是学习 ESD 的主要方法。近年来,动手课程项目的使用频率更高。