• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与医疗诉讼:远非显而易见。

COVID-19 and medical litigation: More than just the obvious.

机构信息

Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School - Western Precinct, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Aug;32(4):703-705. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13548. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.13548
PMID:32386246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7272927/
Abstract

COVID-19 has massively changed the health landscape around the world. Wide-ranging changes to healthcare delivery have occurred, especially in hospitals and EDs. Health services have made local decisions about care pathways, in some cases deviating from what would, until recently, have been considered widely accepted care. These changes bring with them new medicolegal risk for clinicians. In Australia, civil liability Acts provide protection for professionals when the criterion of having undertaken 'competent' practice that would be 'widely accepted' 'in the circumstances' is met. There is doubt how courts, and the medical experts who advise them, will evaluate clinical care provided during the pandemic when health services have developed local care pathways and there is no nationally accepted standard.

摘要

新冠疫情极大地改变了全球的医疗格局。医疗服务的提供发生了广泛的变化,尤其是在医院和急诊部门。卫生服务部门已经就护理途径做出了地方性决策,在某些情况下,这些决策偏离了最近才被认为是广泛接受的护理标准。这些变化给临床医生带来了新的医事法律风险。在澳大利亚,当符合“在当时情况下,具备被广泛接受的合格实践”这一标准时,民事责任法案为专业人员提供了保护。当卫生服务部门制定了地方性的护理途径,而没有全国性认可的标准时,人们对法院以及为其提供咨询的医学专家将如何评估大流行期间提供的临床护理存在疑问。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 and medical litigation: More than just the obvious.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与医疗诉讼:远非显而易见。
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Aug;32(4):703-705. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13548. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Covid-19 and medical negligence litigation: Immunity for healthcare professionals?新冠疫情与医疗过失诉讼:医护人员的豁免权?
Med Leg J. 2020 Nov;88(1_suppl):31-34. doi: 10.1177/0025817220935892. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
The medico-legal implications in medical malpractice claims during Covid-19 pandemic: Increase or trend reversal?新冠疫情期间医疗事故索赔中的法医学影响:增加还是趋势逆转?
Med Leg J. 2020 Nov;88(1_suppl):35-37. doi: 10.1177/0025817220926925. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Clinical negligence claims following the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情后的医疗过失索赔
Br J Nurs. 2020 Jun 25;29(12):716-717. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.12.716.
5
COVID-19: Has the Standard of Care Changed and Are Providers Immune from Liability?新冠病毒病(COVID-19):医疗护理标准是否已改变,医疗服务提供者是否可免于承担责任?
Mo Med. 2020 May-Jun;117(3):199-201.
6
Are errors in otorhinolaryngology always a sign of medical malpractice? Review of the literature and new perspectives in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) era.耳鼻喉科的失误总是医疗事故的迹象吗?SARS-CoV-2(新冠病毒病)时代的文献综述与新视角
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Jun;40(3):157-163. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0674. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Distributive justice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间的分配正义。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jun;90(6):961-962. doi: 10.1111/ans.16069. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Medicolegal Sidebar: Legal Immunity for Healthcare Workers During COVID-19.法医学边栏:COVID-19 期间医护人员的法律豁免权。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2218-2220. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001473.
9
Should doctors tackling covid-19 be immune from negligence liability claims?治疗新冠肺炎的医生是否应免于医疗过失责任索赔?
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2487. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2487.
10
COVID-19 pandemic and the judicialization of health care: an explanatory case study.新冠疫情与医疗保健的司法化:一项解释性案例研究
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3354. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4584.3354. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Healthcare Services and Spending Patterns in Dubai, United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对阿拉伯联合酋长国迪拜医疗服务利用和支出模式的影响:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 14;12(4):473. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040473.
2
Take-Home Messages from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strengths and Pitfalls of the Italian National Health Service from a Medico-Legal Point of View.新冠疫情的经验教训:从法医学角度看意大利国家医疗服务体系的优势与不足
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;9(1):17. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010017.
3
Rethinking Elective Cataract Surgery Diagnostics, Assessments, and Tools after the COVID-19 Pandemic Experience and Beyond: Insights from the EUROCOVCAT Group.新冠疫情期间及之后对选择性白内障手术诊断、评估和工具的重新思考:来自欧洲白内障手术协作组的见解
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 2;10(12):1035. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121035.
4
Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis.危机时期的法院创新与司法救助
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):447-453. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.用于心源性肺水肿的无创正压通气(持续气道正压通气或双水平无创正压通气)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 5;4(4):CD005351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub4.
2
Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.无创通气用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重所致的急性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4.