• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5 个欧洲国家的 Tilburg 衰弱指标的信度和效度。

Reliability and Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in 5 European Countries.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):772-779.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.019
PMID:32387112
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and concurrent validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) within community-dwelling older people in Spain, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Primary care and community settings.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 2250 community-dwelling older people (60.3% women; mean age = 79.7 years; standard deviation = 5.7).

METHODS

We assessed the reliability and validity of the full TFI as well as its physical, psychological, and social domains. Baseline data of the Urban Health Centers Europe project were used. The internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. The convergent and divergent validity were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients between the domains and alternative measures: the 12-item short-form, Groningen activity restriction scale, 5-item mental well-being scale of the 36-Item Short Form Survey, and the De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale. The concurrent validity was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with physically frail (Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Instrument), loss of independence (Groningen activity restriction scale), limited function (Global Activity Limitation Index), poor mental health (5-item mental well-being scale of the 36-Item Short Form Survey), and feeling lonely (De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale) as criteria.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the full TFI was satisfactory with the Cronbach alpha ≥0.70 in the total population and in each country. The internal consistency of the psychological and social domains was not satisfactory. The convergent and divergent validity of the physical, psychological, and social domains was supported by all the alternative measures in the total population and in each country. The concurrent validity of the full TFI and the physical, psychological, and social domains was supported with most area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.70 in the total population and in each country.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The TFI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess frailty in community-dwelling older people in Spain, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

摘要

目的

评估蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI)在西班牙、希腊、克罗地亚、荷兰和英国的社区居住老年人中的内部一致性、收敛和发散有效性以及同时有效性。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

初级保健和社区环境。

参与者

共有 2250 名社区居住的老年人(60.3%为女性;平均年龄为 79.7 岁;标准差为 5.7)。

方法

我们评估了完整的 TFI 的可靠性和有效性,以及其身体、心理和社会领域。使用欧洲城市卫生中心项目的基线数据。内部一致性用 Cronbach alpha 评估。收敛和发散有效性用各领域与替代措施之间的皮尔逊相关系数评估:12 项简短式健康调查、格罗宁根活动限制量表、36 项简短式健康调查的 5 项心理健康量表和 Jong Gierveld 孤独量表。同时有效性通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积评估,使用身体虚弱(欧洲调查健康、老龄化和退休-虚弱工具)、丧失独立性(格罗宁根活动限制量表)、功能受限(全球活动限制指数)、心理健康差(36 项简短式健康调查的 5 项心理健康量表)和孤独感(Jong Gierveld 孤独量表)作为标准。

结果

TFI 的内部一致性在总人口和每个国家中用 Cronbach alpha ≥0.70 评估均令人满意。心理和社会领域的内部一致性则不够满意。在总人口和每个国家中,所有替代措施均支持身体、心理和社会领域的收敛和发散有效性。在总人口和每个国家中,大多数情况下,接收者操作特征曲线下面积≥0.70 支持 TFI 及其身体、心理和社会领域的同时有效性。

结论和意义

TFI 是评估西班牙、希腊、克罗地亚、荷兰和英国社区居住老年人虚弱状况的可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in 5 European Countries.5 个欧洲国家的 Tilburg 衰弱指标的信度和效度。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):772-779.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people.蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)在中国社区居住老年人中的信度和效度
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Nov;73:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Testing of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) Amharic Version for Screening Frailty in Community-Dwelling Ethiopian Older People.跨文化调适、效度和信度检验阿姆哈拉语版提尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)用于社区居住的埃塞俄比亚老年人衰弱筛查。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Jul 24;18:1115-1127. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S416942. eCollection 2023.
4
Psychometric analysis of the Arabic (Saudi) Tilburg Frailty Indicator among Saudi community-dwelling older adults.沙特社区居住的老年人群中,阿拉伯语(沙特)Tilburg 衰弱指标的心理测量学分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Sep-Oct;90:104128. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104128. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties.特利尔虚弱指数:心理测量特性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
6
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): New Evidence for Its Validity.特利尔虚弱指标(TFI):其有效性的新证据。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Feb 21;15:265-274. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S243233. eCollection 2020.
7
Deepening the understanding of the structural validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.深化对蒂尔堡虚弱指标结构有效性的理解。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02407-w. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
8
Prediction of Mortality by the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI).用蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI)预测死亡率。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):607.e1-607.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.033. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Psychometric adequacy of the persian adapted version of the tilburg frailty indicator (P-TFI).波斯语适应版提尔堡虚弱指标(P-TFI)的心理计量学适宜性。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 21;24(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05161-4.
10
Tilburg frailty indicator. German translation and psychometric testing.蒂尔堡衰弱指标。德语翻译及心理测量测试。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Feb;49(2):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0889-9. Epub 2015 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Well-Being of Older People in the City of Valencia: A Comprehensive Study.瓦伦西亚市老年人的健康与福祉:一项综合研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;12(24):2526. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242526.
2
Associations of Frailty, Defined Using Three Different Instruments, with All-Cause Mortality in a Tertiary Outpatient Clinic in Turkiye.在土耳其一家三级门诊诊所中,使用三种不同工具定义的衰弱与全因死亡率的关联。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 8;17:5883-5895. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S485675. eCollection 2024.
3
Frailty Assessment and Its Impact on Loneliness among Older Adults Receiving Home-Based Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情期间接受居家医疗护理的老年人的衰弱评估及其对孤独感的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 21;12(16):1666. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161666.
4
Interplay of Physical, Psychological, and Social Frailty among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Five European Countries: A Longitudinal Study.五种欧洲国家社区居住的老年人身体、心理和社会脆弱性的相互作用:一项纵向研究。
J Urban Health. 2024 Aug;101(4):730-739. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00831-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
The Prediction of Quality of Life by Frailty and Disability among Dutch Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 Years or Older.荷兰75岁及以上社区居住人群中衰弱和残疾对生活质量的预测
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 23;12(9):874. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090874.
6
Frailty in community-dwelling older people and nursing home residents: An adaptation and validation study.社区老年人和养老院居民的衰弱:一项改编与验证研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Mar;80(3):1111-1119. doi: 10.1111/jan.15898. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Translation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale Into the Greek Language and Examination of Its Validity and Reliability.将图片式健康-虚弱量表翻译成希腊语并检验其效度和信度。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):e41553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41553. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Deepening the understanding of the structural validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.深化对蒂尔堡虚弱指标结构有效性的理解。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02407-w. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
9
Frailty Viewed From a Nursing Perspective.从护理视角看衰弱
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Jan 5;9:23779608221150598. doi: 10.1177/23779608221150598. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Sex Differences in Frailty Factors and Their Capacity to Identify Frailty in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Nursing Homes.长期护理养老院中老年人虚弱因素的性别差异及其识别虚弱的能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):54. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010054.