Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Australia; Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia.
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Australia; Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia; Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, NT, Australia; Indigenous Respiratory Outreach Care, The Prince Charles Hospital, QLD, Australia.
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1566-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.084. Epub 2020 May 6.
Inequitable access to quality health care contributes to the known poorer outcomes of people living in regional/remote areas (compared with urban-based), especially for First Nations people. Integration of specialist outreach services within primary care is one strategy that can reduce the inequity when modeled to the needs and available resources of target communities.
To evaluate whether respiratory outreach clinics in regional and remote Queensland are as effective as tertiary respiratory services at improving the lung function of children.
From existing databases, we obtained spirometry data of children (aged 3-18 years) seen at Indigenous-focused outreach clinics in regional and remote Queensland and Brisbane-based pediatric tertiary hospitals over the same contemporary period (October 2010 to July 2019). We compared the change in spirometry z scores (Δz) at follow-up for both groups of children.
Lung function significantly improved in both groups: Tertiary hospital (n = 2,249; ΔzFEV = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.27; ΔzFVC = 0.23, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.28); outreach (n = 252; ΔzFEV = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.48; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.50). No significant intergroup differences were found in ΔzFEV (0.13; 95%CI, -0.02 to 0.28; P = .10) or ΔzFVC (0.14; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.29; P = .08) improvement from baseline. In both groups, the proportion of children with zFEV > 0 at follow-up (hospital = 31.7%; outreach = 46.8%) significantly increased (hospital P = .001; outreach P = .009) from baseline (hospital = 27.2%; outreach = 35.3%). Numbers of children with zFEV > 0 significantly increased for asthma and bronchiectasis outreach subgroups, and for children with asthma in the hospital-based group.
Comparable significant lung function improvement of children was seen in Indigenous-focused outreach remote/regional clinics and paediatric tertiary hospitals. This suggests that effective clinical care is achievable within the outreach setting.
在区域/偏远地区(与城市相比),人们获得优质医疗保健的机会不平等,这导致了人们已知的较差的结果,尤其是对于第一民族的人。将专家外展服务整合到初级保健中,是一种可以根据目标社区的需求和现有资源来减少不平等的策略。
评估昆士兰州偏远地区的呼吸科外展诊所是否与三级呼吸服务一样有效,能改善儿童的肺功能。
我们从现有的数据库中获取了在昆士兰州偏远地区和布里斯班的儿科三级医院的针对原住民的外展诊所就诊的 3-18 岁儿童的肺活量计数据,时间为同一时期(2010 年 10 月至 2019 年 7 月)。我们比较了两组儿童在随访时的肺活量计 z 分数变化(Δz)。
两组儿童的肺功能均显著改善:三级医院(n=2249;ΔzFEV=0.22,95%CI,0.17 至 0.27;ΔzFVC=0.23,95%CI,0.18 至 0.28);外展组(n=252;ΔzFEV=0.35,95%CI,0.22 至 0.48;ΔzFVC=0.36,95%CI,0.23 至 0.50)。从基线到随访,两组之间的ΔzFEV(0.13;95%CI,-0.02 至 0.28;P=0.10)或ΔzFVC(0.14;95%CI,-0.02 至 0.29;P=0.08)的改善均无显著差异。在两组中,随访时 zFEV>0 的儿童比例(医院组=31.7%;外展组=46.8%)显著增加(医院 P=0.001;外展 P=0.009),从基线时(医院组=27.2%;外展组=35.3%)。在哮喘和支气管扩张的外展亚组中,以及在医院组中患有哮喘的儿童中,zFEV>0 的儿童数量显著增加。
在针对原住民的远程/地区外展诊所和儿科三级医院,儿童的肺功能都得到了显著改善。这表明在外出诊的环境中可以实现有效的临床护理。