Suppr超能文献

ADC 比值在多参数前列腺 MRI 鉴别真阳性和假阳性中的准确性。

Accuracy of ADC ratio in discriminating true and false positives in multiparametric prostatic MRI.

机构信息

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, NO, Italy.

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, NO, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jul;128:109024. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109024. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our goal was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios in discriminating true from false positives in multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI in clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 98 prostate lesions in a series of 73 patients who had undergone prostate mpMRI and standard 12-core prostatic biopsy in our institution from 2016 to 2018. Two experienced radiologists performed double blind ADC value quantifications of both MRI-identified lesions and apparently benign contralateral prostatic parenchyma in a circular region of interest (ROI) of ∼10 mm. The ratios between the mean values of both measurements (i.e., ADC ratio mean) and between the minimum value of the lesion and the maximum value of the benign parenchyma (i.e., ADC ratio min-max) were automatically calculated. The malignancy of all lesions was determined through biopsy according to Gleason score (GS ≥ 6) and localization.

RESULTS

For Reader 1, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ADC ratio mean and ADC ratio min-max were 0.72 and 0.67, respectively, whereas for Reader 2 these values were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively. The best cut-off values for ADC ratio means were ≥ 0.5 (Reader 1) and ≥ 0.6 (Reader 2), with a sensitivity of 76.3 % and 84.2 % and a specificity of 51.7 % and 50 %, respectively. Moreover, based on a threshold of 0.6, no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was missed by Reader 1, while only one went unnoticed by Reader 2.

CONCLUSION

The ADC ratio is a useful and moderately accurate complementary tool to diagnose prostate cancer in the mp-MRI.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是评估表观扩散系数(ADC)比值在区分临床实践中多参数(mp)前列腺 MRI 中的真阳性和假阳性的作用。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2016 年至 2018 年期间在我们机构进行的前列腺 mpMRI 和标准 12 核前列腺活检的 73 例患者的 98 个前列腺病变。两名经验丰富的放射科医生在圆形 ROI(直径约 10mm)中对 MRI 确定的病变和明显良性的对侧前列腺实质进行双盲 ADC 值定量。分别计算两次测量的平均值之间的比值(即 ADC 比值平均值)和病变的最小值与良性实质的最大值之间的比值(即 ADC 比值最小-最大)。所有病变的恶性程度均通过活检根据 Gleason 评分(GS≥6)和定位确定。

结果

对于 Reader1,ADC 比值平均值和 ADC 比值最小-最大的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.72 和 0.67,而对于 Reader2 这些值分别为 0.74 和 0.71。ADC 比值平均值的最佳截断值分别为≥0.5(Reader1)和≥0.6(Reader2),敏感性分别为 76.3%和 84.2%,特异性分别为 51.7%和 50%。此外,基于 0.6 的阈值,Reader1 没有遗漏任何临床上显著的前列腺癌(csPCa),而 Reader2 仅漏诊了 1 例。

结论

ADC 比值是一种有用且具有中等准确性的辅助工具,可用于诊断 mp-MRI 中的前列腺癌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验