• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者院内死亡的预测因素

Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with left ventricular assist device.

作者信息

Gonuguntla Karthik, Patil Shivaraj, Cowden Richard Gregory, Kumar Manish, Rojulpote Chaitanya, Bhattaru Abhijit, Tiu John Glenn, Robinson Peter

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Calhoun Cardiology Center University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9301, South Africa.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02246-y. Epub 2020 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-020-02246-y
PMID:32388673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is used to support patients with end-stage heart failure.

AIMS

To examine the role of comorbidities and complications in predicting in-hospital mortality since the introduction of continuous flow (CF)-LVAD.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2010 to 2014 using International Classification of Disease-9 code for LVAD among patients 18 years or older. The sample consisted of 2,359 patients (mean age = 55 ± 13.7 years, 76.8% men, 59.3% Caucasian).

RESULTS

Comparative analysis revealed mortality did not differ from 2010 to 2014 (p = 0.653). Increases in comorbidities of atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation, body mass index ≥ 25, cerebrovascular disease, and mild liver disease were evidenced over the 5-year period (p values ≤ 0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that significant predictors of mortality were comorbid hemodialysis (AOR = 7.62, 95% CI [4.78, 12.27]), cerebrovascular disease (AOR = 5.38, 95% CI [3.49, 8.26]), mechanical ventilation (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI [2.84, 5.18]), mild liver disease (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI [1.38, 2.76]), and acute kidney injury (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.16, 2.28]). Predictive complications included disseminated intravascular coagulation (AOR = 6.41, 95% CI [2.79, 6.84]), sepsis (AOR = 4.37, 95% CI [2.79, 6.84]), septic shock (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI [2.11, 7.59]), and gastrointestinal bleed (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.11, 2.93]).

CONCLUSIONS

CF-LVADs have not reduced mortality, possibly due to utilization in patients with comorbid conditions. Future trials are necessary for improved patient selection and reduced post-procedural complications.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)用于支持终末期心力衰竭患者。

目的

探讨自连续血流(CF)-LVAD应用以来,合并症和并发症在预测住院死亡率中的作用。

方法

使用国际疾病分类第9版代码,查询2010年至2014年18岁及以上患者中LVAD的全国住院患者样本。样本包括2359例患者(平均年龄=55±13.7岁,76.8%为男性,59.3%为白种人)。

结果

比较分析显示,2010年至2014年死亡率无差异(p=0.653)。5年期间,房颤、急性肾损伤、机械通气、体重指数≥25、脑血管疾病和轻度肝病的合并症有所增加(p值≤0.049)。多变量分析显示,死亡率的显著预测因素包括合并血液透析(比值比[AOR]=7.62,95%置信区间[CI][4.78,12.27])、脑血管疾病(AOR=5.38,95%CI[3.49,8.26])、机械通气(AOR=3.83,95%CI[2.84,5.18])、轻度肝病(AOR=1.96,95%CI[1.38,2.76])和急性肾损伤(AOR=1.62,95%CI[1.16,2.28])。预测并发症包括弥散性血管内凝血(AOR=6.41,95%CI[2.79,6.84])、脓毒症(AOR=4.37,95%CI[2.79,6.84])、感染性休克(AOR=3.9,95%CI[2.11,7.59])和胃肠道出血(AOR=1.81,95%CI[1.11,2.93])。

结论

CF-LVAD并未降低死亡率,可能是由于在合并症患者中使用。未来有必要进行试验以改善患者选择并减少术后并发症。

相似文献

1
Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者院内死亡的预测因素
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02246-y. Epub 2020 May 9.
2
A population based analysis of trends, risk factors and outcomes associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices.一项基于人群的关于左心室辅助装置患者胃肠道出血相关趋势、危险因素及结局的分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Aug 15;10(3):247-257. eCollection 2020.
3
Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Sepsis and Severe Sepsis in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者脓毒症和严重脓毒症的趋势、结局及预测因素
Cureus. 2020 Apr 3;12(4):e7523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7523.
4
Sex-Based Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device Utilization: Insights From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004 to 2016.基于性别的左心室辅助装置使用差异:来自 2004 年至 2016 年全国住院患者样本的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;12(9):e006082. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
National Trends in Utilization, Mortality, Complications, and Cost of Care After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation From 2005 to 2011.2005年至2011年左心室辅助装置植入术后护理的使用、死亡率、并发症及费用的全国趋势
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
6
Gender Differences in Outcomes After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置植入术后的性别差异。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):780-786. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.032. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
7
Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes after continuous left ventricular assist device implantation.经胸超声心动图预测连续左心室辅助装置植入后的不良结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Mar;4(3):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.012.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Devices Impact Hospital Resource Utilization Without Affecting Patient Mortality in Gastrointestinal Bleeding.左心室辅助装置对胃肠道出血患者的医院资源利用有影响,但不影响患者死亡率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):150-160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4379-8. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Clinical Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Short-Term Outcomes andIn-Hospital Mortality of Cardiac Mechanical Support with Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD): A Retrospective Study from a National Database.糖尿病对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)心脏机械支持的短期结局和住院死亡率的临床影响:一项来自国家数据库的回顾性研究
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):883-886. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
10
Outcome of cardiac transplantation in patients requiring prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.需要长期持续血流左心室辅助装置支持的患者心脏移植的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Age Is a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcomes for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Nationwide Analysis.年龄是左心室辅助装置植入术后院内结局的预测因素:一项全国性分析。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 22;14(3):236. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030236.
2
Interplay between driveline infection, vessel wall inflammation, cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients with left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者的导线感染、血管壁炎症、脑血管事件和死亡率之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 29;13(1):18552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45110-6.
3
In a large-volume multidisciplinary setting individual surgeon volume does not impact LVAD outcomes.
在大容量多学科环境中,个体外科医生的手术量不会影响 LVAD 结果。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3290-3299. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16783. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
A population based analysis of trends, risk factors and outcomes associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices.一项基于人群的关于左心室辅助装置患者胃肠道出血相关趋势、危险因素及结局的分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Aug 15;10(3):247-257. eCollection 2020.