Pharynx gargle samples are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic use and save personal protective equipment and swabs.
作者信息
Malecki Monika, Lüsebrink Jessica, Teves Stefanie, Wendel Andreas F
机构信息
Institute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
出版信息
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):248-249. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.229. Epub 2020 May 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Pharynx gargle samples are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic use and save personal protective equipment and swabs.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):248-249. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.229. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Comparison of the pain experienced with anterior nasal swabs and nose and throat swabs in children.
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Feb;107(2):207. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321708. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Pooling samples: a testing option for SARS-CoV-2 during a supply shortage.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115205. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115205. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Optimum Naso-oropharyngeal Swab Procedure for COVID-19: Step-by-Step Preparation and Technical Hints.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Nov;130(11):2564-2567. doi: 10.1002/lary.29010. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
5
Swab the Throat as Well as the Nose? The Debate Over the Best Way to Test for SARS-CoV-2.
JAMA. 2023 Feb 7;329(5):357-358. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23311.
6
Serial simultaneously self-swabbed samples from multiple sites show similarly decreasing SARS-CoV-2 loads in COVID-19 cases of differing clinical severity.
J Infect. 2020 Dec;81(6):979-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
7
Parallel testing of 241 clinical nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assays.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Nov 19;59(2):e45-e48. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1338.
8
Using Throat Swabs Improved Sensitivity in Detecting SARS-CoV-2.
JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):101. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25267.
9
Ultra-absorptive Nanofiber Swabs for Improved Collection and Test Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 and other Biological Specimens.
Nano Lett. 2021 Feb 10;21(3):1508-1516. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04956. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0244417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244417. eCollection 2020.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparison of Four Active SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Strategies in Representative Population Sample Points: Two-Factor Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Aug 17;9:e44204. doi: 10.2196/44204.
2
Extraction-free clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from saline gargle samples using Hamilton STARlet liquid handler.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):4241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30993-2.
3
Performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Sep 20;31(165). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0014-2022. Print 2022 Sep 30.
4
User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers and household contacts.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;104(1):115732. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115732. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Direct comparison of Altona-SARS-CoV-2 dual target RT-qPCR Assay with commercial LAMP Assay using throat washes in health care staff testing.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2022 Aug;2(3):100088. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100088. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Different Respiratory Samples for COVID-19 Detection by Standard and Direct Quantitative RT-PCR: A Literature Review.
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):285-299. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2021.115458.15383.
7
In-Depth Longitudinal Comparison of Clinical Specimens to Detect SARS-CoV-2.
Pathogens. 2021 Oct 21;10(11):1362. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111362.
8
Natural spring water gargle samples as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a laboratory-developed test.
J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):985-993. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27407. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Prevalence of subjective impairments of the sense of smell and taste in employees of retirement and nursing homes during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):175-180. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1005. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
10
Feasibility of a surveillance programme based on gargle samples and pool testing to prevent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in schools.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98849-1.
Zotero 插件