Suppr超能文献

评估接受塑形头盔治疗的偏头畸形婴儿的面部和颅面对称性。

Assessment of facial and cranial symmetry in infants with deformational plagiocephaly undergoing molding helmet therapy.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W30, D-48149, Münster, Germany.

Clinic for Maxillofacial-Surgery Münster, Schorlemerstraße 26, D-48143, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;48(6):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the effects on facial and cranial symmetry through molding helmet therapy in infants with positional plagiocephaly. A 3D asymmetry index (3DAI), which measures both cranial and facial symmetry, was introduced and compared to the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI).

MATERIAL & METHODS: Optical 3D-scans of children with positional plagiocephaly were evaluated retrospectively. Pre- and post-therapeutic asymmetry values of the cranium and face were determined and paired t-tests were applied. Pearson correlations were calculated for facial and cranial asymmetries.

RESULTS

65 children (age: 3-6 months) were included. Asymmetry values (mean/standard deviation, pre- and post-therapeutic) were for 3DAI determinations: cranium: 9.96/1.84-8.11/1.74 p < 0.001; face: 4.70/1.06-3.89/0.91 p < 0.001; and for CVAI measurements: 9.10/3.29-5.88/2.78 p < 0.001. No correlation was found between facial and cranial asymmetry (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Symmetry values improved significantly in post therapeutic 3D-scans for both asymmetry indices. The analysis of cranial symmetry by 3DAI should be preferred over the CVAI because it gives more comprehensive information, including the symmetry of the entire cranial surface and the face.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过塑形头盔治疗确定对偏头症婴儿面部和颅面对称性的影响。引入了一种 3D 不对称指数(3DAI),用于测量颅面和面部对称性,并与颅穹窿不对称指数(CVAI)进行比较。

材料和方法

回顾性评估患有姿势性斜头畸形的儿童的光学 3D 扫描。确定治疗前后颅骨和面部的不对称值,并应用配对 t 检验。计算面部和颅骨不对称的 Pearson 相关性。

结果

共纳入 65 名儿童(年龄:3-6 个月)。3DAI 测定的不对称值(平均值/标准差,治疗前和治疗后)为:颅骨:9.96/1.84-8.11/1.74 p <0.001;面部:4.70/1.06-3.89/0.91 p <0.001;CVAI 测量值为:9.10/3.29-5.88/2.78 p <0.001。面部和颅骨不对称之间未发现相关性(p > 0.05)。

结论

两种不对称指数的治疗后 3D 扫描对称性值均显著改善。3DAI 分析颅面对称性优于 CVAI,因为它提供了更全面的信息,包括整个颅面和面部的对称性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验