• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估接受新辅助治疗的食管癌患者的第八版 TNM 分期系统:一项 SEER 研究。

Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao, P.R. China.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Weifang, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4648-4655. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2997. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.2997
PMID:32391623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7333840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the eighth edition of ypTNM staging system for patients with esophageal cancer was limited in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A total of 2324 patients with esophageal cancer receiving radio(chemo)therapy prior to surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2013 were eligible for the analysis. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate overall survivals.

RESULTS

Among patients with preoperative therapy, both the seventh edition TNM grouping and the eighth edition ypTNM grouping could significantly stratify the overall survival (both log-rank P < .001). There was not significant difference in the C-index of the seventh edition TNM grouping (0.575; 95%CI, 0.558-0.593) and the eighth edition ypTNM grouping (0.569; 95%CI, 0.551-0.587) (P = .098). In multivariable Cox analysis, ypN category was the strongest predictor of overall survival (P < .001), followed by tumor grade (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.12-1.56; P = .001). The combination of ypT, ypN, and ypG categories yielded significantly higher C-index (0.591; 95%CI, 0.573-0.609) than that of the seventh edition TNM staging (P = .024).

CONCLUSION

Tumor grade remained an independent predictor of overall survival in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, and could improve the performance of ypTNM staging system.

摘要

背景

在新辅助治疗的背景下,对食管癌患者的第八版 ypTNM 分期系统的评估受到限制。

方法

从 2004 年至 2013 年,SEER 数据库中共有 2324 名接受术前放化疗的食管癌患者符合分析条件。Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险模型用于估计总生存率。

结果

在接受术前治疗的患者中,第七版 TNM 分组和第八版 ypTNM 分组均能显著分层总生存率(对数秩 P<0.001)。第七版 TNM 分组的 C 指数(0.575;95%CI,0.558-0.593)和第八版 ypTNM 分组(0.569;95%CI,0.551-0.587)之间无显著差异(P=0.098)。在多变量 Cox 分析中,ypN 分期是总生存的最强预测因素(P<0.001),其次是肿瘤分级(HR,1.33;95%CI,1.12-1.56;P=0.001)。ypT、ypN 和 ypG 分期的组合产生的 C 指数显著高于第七版 TNM 分期(0.591;95%CI,0.573-0.609)(P=0.024)。

结论

在新辅助治疗的背景下,肿瘤分级仍然是总生存的独立预测因素,并且可以提高 ypTNM 分期系统的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/0161ab7b577c/CAM4-9-4648-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/27a0081df3c0/CAM4-9-4648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/ba5c1ccf7566/CAM4-9-4648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/0161ab7b577c/CAM4-9-4648-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/27a0081df3c0/CAM4-9-4648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/ba5c1ccf7566/CAM4-9-4648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/7333840/0161ab7b577c/CAM4-9-4648-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study.评估接受新辅助治疗的食管癌患者的第八版 TNM 分期系统:一项 SEER 研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4648-4655. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2997. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Prognostic differences in 8th edition TNM staging of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment.新辅助治疗后食管胃腺癌 8 版 TNM 分期的预后差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;44(10):1646-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
3
Comparison of the prognostic value of the 6th and 7th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system in patients with lower esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.比较第 6 版和第 7 版国际抗癌联盟 TNM 分期系统在下咽癌患者新辅助化疗后手术中的预后价值。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01350.x. Epub 2012 May 16.
4
External Validation of Pretreatment Pathological Tumor Extent in Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗食管癌患者术前病理肿瘤侵犯程度的外部验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1250-1258. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08024-0. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Validation of the post-neoadjuvant staging system of the American joint committee on cancer, 8th edition, in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.验证第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会的新辅助分期系统在接受新辅助放化疗后行根治性食管切除术治疗局限性食管鳞状细胞癌患者中的应用。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:491-497. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.10.015. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.对接受手术切除的食管鳞状细胞癌患者进行第7版TNM分类评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18397-403. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18397.
7
Recommendations for neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.《美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第8版分期手册中食管癌和食管胃交界癌新辅助病理分期(ypTNM)的推荐》
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):906-912. doi: 10.1111/dote.12538.
8
ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system.中国胃癌人群新辅助化疗后 ypTNM 分期:对 AJCC 第八版癌症分期系统预后价值的评估。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Nov;21(6):977-987. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0830-1. Epub 2018 May 10.
9
International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)TNM 分期系统在可切除胰腺癌患者中的国际验证。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):e183617. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3617. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的生存情况:在两个当代国家患者队列中比较第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联合会分期系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1408-1416. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0306. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The systemic oxidative stress index predicts clinical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.全身氧化应激指数可预测接受新辅助免疫化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌的临床结局。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 31;16:1535507. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1535507. eCollection 2025.
2
CT-based habitat radiomics for predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal cancer patients.基于CT的影像组学在预测食管癌患者新辅助化疗免疫治疗反应中的应用
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 3;14:1418252. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1418252. eCollection 2024.
3
Nomogram based on pretreatment hepatic and renal function indicators for survival prediction of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with treatment of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术对比单纯手术治疗局部进展期食管鳞癌(NEOCRTEC5010):一项 III 期、多中心、随机、开放标签临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
2
Prognostic differences in 8th edition TNM staging of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment.新辅助治疗后食管胃腺癌 8 版 TNM 分期的预后差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;44(10):1646-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
3
基于治疗前肝肾功能指标的列线图预测新辅助放化疗加手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的生存。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1377-1388. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01693-3. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Comparison of McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.麦克唐纳微创食管切除术与Sweet食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 19;12:1009315. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1009315. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparisons of prognosis prediction accuracy between modified and unmodified versions of 8 edition ypTNM.第8版ypTNM改良版与未改良版之间预后预测准确性的比较。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):600. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2353.
6
The Impact of Tumor Regression on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Surgically Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.新辅助放化疗后手术治疗的食管腺癌中肿瘤退缩对预后的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3658-3666. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11336-3. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
Recommendations for neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.
《美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第8版分期手册中食管癌和食管胃交界癌新辅助病理分期(ypTNM)的推荐》
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):906-912. doi: 10.1111/dote.12538.
4
Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer.食管癌与食管胃交界癌:第八版分期指南
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jan;12(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: neoadjuvant pathologic staging data.全球食管癌协作组:新辅助病理分期数据。
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):715-723. doi: 10.1111/dote.12513.
6
Identification and Validation of Lymphovascular Invasion as a Prognostic and Staging Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.淋巴结阴性食管鳞癌中淋巴管浸润的鉴定和验证及其作为预后和分期因素的意义。
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Apr;11(4):583-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.12.109. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Adjuvant Therapy for Positive Nodes After Induction Therapy and Resection of Esophageal Cancer.诱导治疗和食管癌切除术后阳性淋巴结的辅助治疗
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):200-8; discussion 208-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
8
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
Salvage Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Esophageal Cancer: Is It a Viable Therapeutic Option?放化疗后挽救性手术治疗食管癌:是否可行的治疗选择?
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3866-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9092. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015.食管和胃食管交界处癌,第 1.2015 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Feb;13(2):194-227. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0028.