• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同创伤中心创伤性脑损伤的化学预防与静脉血栓栓塞

Chemoprophylaxis and Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Brain Injury at Different Trauma Centers.

作者信息

Yeates Eric O, Grigorian Areg, Schubl Sebastian D, Kuza Catherine M, Joe Victor, Lekawa Michael, Borazjani Boris, Nahmias Jeffry

机构信息

From the *Department of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California; and.

†Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2020 Apr 1;86(4):362-368.

PMID:32391761
Abstract

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Because of concerns of worsening intracranial hemorrhage, clinicians are hesitant to start VTE chemoprophylaxis in this population. We hypothesized that ACS Level I trauma centers would be more aggressive with VTE chemoprophylaxis in adults with severe TBI than Level II centers. We also predicted that Level I centers would have a lower risk of VTE. We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) database for patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of 4 and 5 of the head and compared them based on treating the hospital trauma level. Of 204,895 patients with severe TBI, 143,818 (70.2%) were treated at Level I centers and 61,077 (29.8%) at Level II centers. The Level I cohort had a higher rate of VTE chemoprophylaxis use (43.2% 23.3%, < 0.001) and a shorter median time to chemoprophylaxis (61.9 85.9 hours, < 0.001). Although Level I trauma centers started VTE chemoprophylaxis more often and earlier than Level II centers, there was no difference in the risk of VTE ( = 0.414) after controlling for covariates. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the timing, safety, and efficacy of early VTE chemoprophylaxis in severe TBI patients.

摘要

重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。由于担心颅内出血恶化,临床医生对于在这一人群中启动VTE化学预防措施犹豫不决。我们假设,美国外科医师学会(ACS)一级创伤中心在重度TBI成年患者中进行VTE化学预防时会比二级中心更积极。我们还预测一级中心的VTE风险会更低。我们查询了创伤质量改进计划(2010 - 2016年)数据库中头部简明损伤量表评分为4分和5分的患者,并根据治疗医院的创伤级别对他们进行比较。在204,895例重度TBI患者中,143,818例(70.2%)在一级中心接受治疗,61,077例(29.8%)在二级中心接受治疗。一级队列中VTE化学预防措施的使用率更高(43.2%对23.3%,P<0.001),且化学预防的中位时间更短(61.9小时对85.9小时,P<0.001)。尽管一级创伤中心比二级中心更频繁、更早地启动VTE化学预防措施,但在控制协变量后,VTE风险并无差异(P = 0.414)。有必要开展未来的前瞻性研究,以评估重度TBI患者早期VTE化学预防的时机、安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Chemoprophylaxis and Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Brain Injury at Different Trauma Centers.不同创伤中心创伤性脑损伤的化学预防与静脉血栓栓塞
Am Surg. 2020 Apr 1;86(4):362-368.
2
Association of timing and agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury on venous thromboembolism events, mortality, neurosurgical intervention, and discharge disposition.严重创伤性脑损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的时机和药物与静脉血栓栓塞事件、死亡率、神经外科干预以及出院转归的关系。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Oct 1;97(4):590-603. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004383. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
A collaborative multidisciplinary trauma program improvement team improves VTE chemoprophylaxis guideline compliance in non-operative stable TBI.协作式多学科创伤项目改进团队提高了非手术稳定型 TBI 患者的 VTE 化学预防指南的依从性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jul 1;97(1):119-124. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004294. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in geriatric trauma patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.老年创伤患者伴孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤的静脉血栓栓塞症化学预防。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02299-5. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Determining the impact of culture on venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients: A Southwestern Surgical Congress Multicenter trial.确定文化对创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的影响:西南外科学会多中心试验。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1030-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Early Anti-Xa Assay-Guided Low Molecular Weight Heparin Chemoprophylaxis Is Safe in Adult Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.早期抗Xa检测指导下的低分子量肝素化学预防在急性创伤性脑损伤成年患者中是安全的。
Am Surg. 2020 Apr 1;86(4):369-376.
7
Early Chemoprophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞的早期化学预防
Am Surg. 2022 Feb;88(2):187-193. doi: 10.1177/0003134820983171. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Early venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in combat-related penetrating brain injury.颅脑战创伤相关早期静脉血栓栓塞症的化学预防。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1047-1055. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS16101. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical trauma patients.神经外科创伤患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防
J Surg Res. 2016 Sep;205(1):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Early Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Does not Increase the Risk of Intracranial Hematoma Progression in Patients with Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.早期化学性血栓预防不会增加单纯严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内血肿进展的风险。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2804-2811. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05072-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者化学性静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的回顾性评估
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Apr 20;13:100168. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100168. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Similar rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and failure of non-operative management for early versus delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis in adolescent blunt solid organ injuries: a propensity-matched analysis.青少年钝性实体器官损伤中,早期与延迟静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)化学预防的 VTE 发生率和非手术治疗失败率相似:倾向匹配分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1391-1398. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02440-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.