School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Institute of Management and decision, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093268.
The selection of appropriate green chain suppliers is a very critical decision for effective and efficient green supply chain management in today's increased awareness and significant environmental pressures from various stakeholders. The aim of this paper is to screen appropriate green chain suppliers based on a framework using fuzzy TOPSIS and ELECTRE for a Chinese internet company. The framework is proposed, grounded on a literature review on green supply chain management practices, after which an empirical analysis is made to be applied an integrated suppliers selection, based on green practices incorporating specifically data collected of the 12 criteria from a set of 12 available suppliers. We use a fuzzy TOPSIS and ELECTRE approach to rank the green chain suppliers, and the results of the proposed framework are compared with the ranks obtained by both the outranking degrees and the incomparability among the actions of fuzzy ELECTRE methodology. Finally, sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the feasibility of the best alternative. The results indicated that the best supplier was alternative 9, and there were four dominant criteria: management support for GSCM, used environmentally friendly materials, followed legal environmental requirements and policies, and reduced the use of harmful substances.
选择合适的绿色供应链供应商对于当今日益增强的环保意识和来自各利益相关者的重大环境压力下,实现绿色供应链管理的有效性和高效率至关重要。本文旨在基于模糊 TOPSIS 和 ELECTRE 为一家中国互联网公司的绿色供应链供应商建立筛选框架。该框架是在对绿色供应链管理实践的文献综述基础上提出的,之后进行实证分析,以根据具体的绿色实践(包括从 12 个可用供应商中收集的 12 个标准)整合供应商选择。我们使用模糊 TOPSIS 和 ELECTRE 方法对绿色供应链供应商进行排名,并将所提出框架的结果与通过超优排序度和模糊 ELECTRE 方法行动之间的不可比性获得的排名进行比较。最后,进行了敏感性分析以测试最佳替代方案的可行性。结果表明,最佳供应商是替代方案 9,有四个主要标准:对 GSCM 的管理支持、使用环保材料、遵守法律环境要求和政策、以及减少有害物质的使用。