Suppr超能文献

不同间隔低强度脉冲超声联合机械力治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效与安全性:一项初步研究

[Efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound at different intervals by mechanical force in treating erectile dysfunction: a preliminary study].

作者信息

Xia S J, Chen H R, Li Z, Li X C, Zhi E L, Tian R H, Li P, Huang Y H, Hu J L, Qiu Y

机构信息

Urologic Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.

Clinical Research Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 May 12;100(18):1432-1436. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191207-02679.

Abstract

To study the efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) at different intervals by mechanical force in treating erectile dysfunction (ED). Forty patients with mild to moderate ED were randomized in a 1∶1 ratio to receive 16-treatment sessions of LIPUS in group A and group B, applied 3 times per week and 2 times per week, respectively. End-point assessments were made at 8th week after treatment. Efficacy were evaluated using International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score (IIEF-EF), Erectile Hardness Score (EHS), Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), Global Assessment Question (GAQ), and pain were assessed by Visual Analogue Score (VAS).Treatment response was confirmed by a minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) at 8th week. Compared with baseline, IIEF-EF score [(17.1±5.48 vs 23.4±3.75, 0.05) and (18.9±4.34 vs 24.1±4.32, 0.05)], proportion of EHS 4 [(0 vs 40%, 0.05) and (16.7% vs 55.6%, 0.05)], and Overall Relationship score [(50.6 vs 67.5, 0.05) and (44.4 vs 70.1, 0.05)] were significantly improved at 8th week in two groups, respectively. Compared with baseline, the positive responses to SEP-3 increased significantly at 8th week in two groups (50.0% vs 80.0%,0.05) and (44.4% vs 88.9%, 0.05), respectively. The positive responses to GAQ-2 were 90.0% and 88.9% at 8th week in two groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in IIEF-EF, EHS, SEAR, SEP and GAQ at 8th week between two groups. There was no significant difference in treatment response using MCID between two groups at end-point (80.5% vs 77.5%). The treatment duration for full sessions were 2.5 weeks less in group A than group B. No adverse effects were reported in all cases. LIPUS at two different intervals is effective and safe for mild to moderate ED, and the regimen at 3 times per week can achieve quite good effect in relatively short duration,while the long-term effects is still be clarified in further study.

摘要

研究不同间隔的低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)通过机械力治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的疗效和安全性。40例轻度至中度ED患者按1∶1比例随机分为A组和B组,分别接受16次LIPUS治疗,A组每周治疗3次,B组每周治疗2次。在治疗后第8周进行终点评估。采用国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能领域评分(IIEF-EF)、勃起硬度评分(EHS)、自尊与关系问卷(SEAR)、性经历概况(SEP)、总体评估问题(GAQ)评估疗效,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。通过第8周的最小临床重要差异(MCID)确认治疗反应。与基线相比,两组在第8周时IIEF-EF评分[(17.1±5.48对23.4±3.75,P<0.05)和(18.9±4.34对24.1±4.32,P<0.05)]、EHS 4级比例[(0对40%,P<0.05)和(16.7%对55.6%,P<0.05)]以及总体关系评分[(50.6对67.5,P<0.05)和(44.4对70.1,P<0.05)]均显著改善。与基线相比,两组在第8周时对SEP-3的阳性反应均显著增加(50.0%对80.0%,P<0.05)和(44.4%对88.9%,P<0.05)。两组在第8周时对GAQ-2的阳性反应分别为90.0%和88.9%。两组在第8周时的IIEF-EF、EHS、SEAR、SEP和GAQ方面无显著差异。终点时两组采用MCID评估的治疗反应无显著差异(80.5%对77.5%)。A组完成全部疗程的治疗时间比B组少2.5周。所有病例均未报告不良反应。不同间隔的LIPUS治疗轻度至中度ED有效且安全,每周3次的治疗方案可在相对较短时间内取得较好效果,但其长期效果仍有待进一步研究明确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验