• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A review of approaches for resolving disputes between physicians and families on end-of-life care for newborns.

作者信息

Cummings Brian M, Mercurio Mark R, Paris John J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06504, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2020 Sep;40(9):1441-1445. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0675-4. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1038/s41372-020-0675-4
PMID:32393828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7223960/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A review of approaches for resolving disputes between physicians and families on end-of-life care for newborns.关于解决医生与家庭在新生儿临终关怀方面争议的方法综述。
J Perinatol. 2020 Sep;40(9):1441-1445. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0675-4. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Howe v. MGH and Hudson v. Texas Children's Hospital: two approaches to resolving family-physician disputes in end-of-life care.豪诉麻省总医院案和哈德逊诉德克萨斯儿童医院案：解决临终关怀中家庭医生纠纷的两种方法。
J Perinatol. 2006 Dec;26(12):726-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211591.
3
Physician Approaches to Conflict with Families Surrounding End-of-Life Decision-making in the Intensive Care Unit. A Qualitative Study.重症监护病房中，医生在处理与临终决策相关的家庭冲突时的方法。一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Feb;15(2):241-249. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-105OC.
4
Compassion and mercy are not helpful in resolving intractable family-physician conflicts on end-of-life care.在解决临终关怀中棘手的医患家庭冲突时，同情和怜悯并无帮助。
J Perinatol. 2019 Jan;39(1):11-17. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0272-y. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
5
Court-mediated disputes between physicians and families over the medical care of children.法庭调解的医生与家庭之间关于儿童医疗护理的纠纷。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Sep;158(9):891-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.9.891.
6
Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis.
JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.909.
7
A mediation/medical advisory panel model for resolving disputes about end-of-life care.一种用于解决临终关怀纠纷的调解/医学咨询小组模式。
J Clin Ethics. 2002 Fall;13(3):188-202.
8
Controversies abound in end-of-life decisions.临终决策中存在诸多争议。
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):401. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009413.
9
Strengths of the French end-of-life Law as Well as its Shortcomings in Handling Intractable Disputes Between Physicians and Families.法国临终关怀法的优点及其在处理医生与家属之间棘手纠纷方面的不足。
New Bioeth. 2020 Mar;26(1):53-74. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2020.1720421. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
10
Finding common ground to achieve a "good death": family physicians working with substitute decision-makers of dying patients. A qualitative grounded theory study.寻找共同基础以实现“善终”：家庭医生与临终患者的替代决策人合作。一项定性扎根理论研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jan 22;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-14.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿重症监护病房中共同决策的重要性。
J Perinatol. 2020 Mar;40(3):504-509. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0507-6. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU.新生儿重症监护病房决策中的伦理问题
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063.
3
Conjoined Twins Separation Leading to the Death of One Twin: An Expanded Ethical Analysis of Issues Facing the ICU Team.联体双胞胎分离导致其中一个死亡：对 ICU 团队面临问题的扩展伦理分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):81-84. doi: 10.1177/0885066618791953. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
4
Dispute between physicians and family on surgical treatment for an infant with ultra short gut syndrome: the perspective of an Ethics Committee.医生与家属关于一名超短肠综合征婴儿手术治疗的争议：伦理委员会的观点
J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;38(7):781-784. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0162-3. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.与新生儿重症监护中以父母为中心的决策偏好相关的特征。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 May 1;172(5):461-468. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5776.
6
The Charlie Gard case: British and American approaches to court resolution of disputes over medical decisions.查理·加德案：英美两国通过法院解决医疗决策纠纷的方式。
J Perinatol. 2017 Dec;37(12):1268-1271. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.138. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Physicians Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care.医生对新生儿及儿科重症监护中共同决策的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;35(4):669-676. doi: 10.1177/1049909117734843. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Approaches to end-of-life discussions with parents of a profoundly compromised newborn.与患有严重疾病新生儿的父母进行临终讨论的方法。
J Perinatol. 2017 Oct;37(10):1078-1081. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.77.
9
Guidance on Forgoing Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment.放弃生命支持治疗的指南。
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1905.
10
"Brain death," "dead," and parental denial - the case of Jahi McMath.“脑死亡”、“死亡”与父母的否认——贾希·麦克马思事件
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Oct;23(4):371-82. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000048. Epub 2014 Jul 17.