Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法治疗间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征相关症状的止痛效果-一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Pain reduction realized with extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of symptoms associated with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome-A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1505-1514. doi: 10.1002/nau.24382. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

AIMS

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) inhibited bladder inflammation and pain in preclinical studies. We assessed ESWT for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS).

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled physician-initiated study enrolled 54 patients with IC/BPS. The patients were assigned to ESWT (N = 24; 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 Hz, and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 mJ/mm ) once a week for 4 weeks at suprapubic bladder area or placebo (N = 25; shock wave setting without energy transmission). The primary endpoint was the average changes in O'Leary-Sant symptom scores (OSS) between baseline and 4 weeks after treatment. Secondary endpoints included visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10) for pain, the average changes of variables in a 3-day voiding diary, and global response assessment of patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks posttreatment, both groups were associated with a statistically significant decrease in OSS and VAS pain scale. However, there were no difference in mean change between ESWT vs placebo groups. A significantly higher proportion of patients on ESWT responded as improved in the VAS ≥ 3 vs placebo (P = .035). At 12 weeks posttreatment, improvement in the VAS ≥ 3 was 57.1% vs 19.0% (ESWT vs placebo; P = .011). The finding was associated with an improvement in frequency - 1.0 ± 2.3 vs 0.7 ± 3.2 (ESWT vs placebo; P = .065). No significant adverse events were found in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in pain was discovered in this trial assessing ESWT in patients with IC/BPS but OSS, which was the primary outcome parameter, was not improved.

摘要

目的

体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在临床前研究中抑制了膀胱炎症和疼痛。我们评估了 ESWT 治疗难治性间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征(IC/BPS)的效果。

方法

这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的医生发起研究纳入了 54 名 IC/BPS 患者。患者被分配到 ESWT 组(N=24;2000 次冲击波,频率为 3 Hz,最大总能量流密度为 0.25 mJ/mm²),每周一次,共 4 周,在耻骨上膀胱区域进行治疗;或安慰剂组(N=25;设置冲击波但不传输能量)。主要终点是治疗后 4 周时 O'Leary-Sant 症状评分(OSS)的平均变化。次要终点包括疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS,0-10)、3 天排尿日记中变量的平均变化以及患者满意度的整体反应评估。

结果

治疗后 4 周时,两组 OSS 和 VAS 疼痛评分均显著下降。然而,ESWT 组与安慰剂组之间的平均变化无差异。ESWT 组有更高比例的患者在 VAS 上改善≥3 分,而安慰剂组为 57.1%比 19.0%(ESWT 组与安慰剂组;P=0.035)。治疗后 12 周时,VAS 改善≥3 分的比例为 57.1%比 19.0%(ESWT 组与安慰剂组;P=0.011)。这与频率的改善有关,ESWT 组为-1.0±2.3 分,安慰剂组为 0.7±3.2 分(ESWT 组与安慰剂组;P=0.065)。两组均未发现明显的不良事件。

结论

本试验发现 ESWT 可减轻 IC/BPS 患者的疼痛,但主要结局参数 OSS 并未改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验