Baden D N, Roetman M H, Boeije T, Mullaart-Jansen N, Burg M D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, Netherlands.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Netherlands.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_87_18. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Anterior shoulder dislocations (ASDs) are frequent painful injuries commonly treated in the emergency department. The last decade new potentially less traumatic and painful reduction techniques for ASDs have been introduced. Recent literature comparing best reduction techniques, medication use, and approaches is limited. To better guide future research including the use of these newer techniques, information about the current use of different reduction techniques and medication is needed.
Our primary aim was to survey the techniques used by emergency practitioners to reduce ASDs. Our secondary objective was to gather data on medication usage during reduction. To these ends, we surveyed members of the Netherlands Society of Emergency Physicians.
Forty-four percent of respondents reported using a traction-based technique (Hippocrates or Stimson). Biomechanical techniques were used by 40% of respondents. Twelve percent reported using the Kocher leverage-based technique. Five percent of the techniques used could not be classified. A wide variety of procedural sedation and pain management interventions were reported, with an opioid and propofol being used most commonly. Approximately 9% of the reductions were attempted without any medications.
To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind on ASD management by emergency practitioners. Our results indicate that Dutch emergency practitioners employ all three classes of reduction techniques: traction-countertraction most commonly, closely followed by biomechanical techniques. Medication use during repositioning varied widely. Per our survey, emergency practitioners are desirous of an evidence-based guideline for ASD management.
肩关节前脱位(ASD)是急诊科常见的疼痛性损伤。在过去十年中,已引入了一些新的、可能创伤性和疼痛性较小的ASD复位技术。最近比较最佳复位技术、药物使用和方法的文献有限。为了更好地指导未来的研究,包括这些新技术的使用,需要了解不同复位技术和药物的当前使用情况。
我们的主要目的是调查急诊医生用于复位ASD的技术。我们的次要目标是收集复位过程中药物使用的数据。为此,我们对荷兰急诊医师协会的成员进行了调查。
44%的受访者报告使用基于牵引的技术(希波克拉底法或斯廷森法)。40%的受访者使用生物力学技术。12%的受访者报告使用基于科赫尔杠杆的技术。所使用的技术中有5%无法分类。报告了各种各样的程序性镇静和疼痛管理干预措施,最常用的是阿片类药物和丙泊酚。约9%的复位尝试未使用任何药物。
据我们所知,这是同类中第一项关于急诊医生对ASD处理的研究。我们的结果表明,荷兰急诊医生采用了所有三类复位技术:最常用的是牵引-对抗牵引技术,其次是生物力学技术。复位过程中的药物使用差异很大。根据我们的调查,急诊医生希望有一个基于证据的ASD处理指南。