• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Survey of Emergency Providers Regarding the Current Management of Anterior Shoulder Dislocations.一项关于急诊医护人员对当前肩关节前脱位管理情况的调查。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_87_18. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Which factors influence the ED length-of-stay after anterior shoulder dislocations: a retrospective chart review in 716 cases.哪些因素影响前肩关节脱位后 ED 住院时间:716 例回顾性图表分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 May 20;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00336-9.
3
Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial- the BRASD-trial protocol.前肩脱位的生物力学复位技术:一项随机多中心临床试验——BRASD试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e013676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013676.
4
Effects of reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation without sedation or intra-articular pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无镇静或关节内疼痛管理的急性前肩脱位复位技术的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02242-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Austere Diagnosis and Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocations: 10-Year Review of a Ski Patrol-Based Program with Emergency Medical Technicians.严谨诊断和减少前肩脱位:基于滑雪巡逻的医疗技术员计划的 10 年回顾。
Wilderness Environ Med. 2023 Dec;34(4):410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性前肩关节脱位的闭合复位技术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Apr;47(2):407-421. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01427-9. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Elbow Dislocations in the Emergency Department: A Review of Reduction Techniques.急诊科的肘关节脱位:复位技术综述
J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;54(6):849-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Evaluation of the Davos self-assisted technique for reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocations: a comparative study with the traction/countertraction technique.评估达沃斯自助技术治疗前肩肱关节脱位的复位效果:与牵引/对抗牵引技术的对比研究。
JSES Int. 2022 Jan 17;6(3):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.020. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Comparison of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous sedation for reduction of shoulder dislocations: a randomized, prospective study.关节内注射利多卡因与静脉镇静用于复位肩关节脱位的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Dec;84(12):2135-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200212000-00002.
10
Anterior shoulder dislocations: beyond traction-countertraction.肩关节前脱位:超越牵引-对抗牵引法
J Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;27(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation without sedation or intra-articular pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无镇静或关节内疼痛管理的急性前肩脱位复位技术的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02242-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
BRASD trial: biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation-a randomized multicenter clinical trial.BRASD试验:前肩关节脱位的生物力学复位技术——一项随机多中心临床试验
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 24;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00480-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey on the management of acute first-time anterior shoulder dislocation amongst Dutch public hospitals.荷兰公立医院首次急性前肩关节脱位管理情况调查
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):447-54. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2156-3. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
2
A comparison of suprascapular nerve block and procedural sedation analgesia in shoulder dislocation reduction.肩胛上神经阻滞与程序镇静镇痛在肩关节脱位复位中的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):549-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
3
A prospective comparison of procedural sedation and ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block for shoulder reduction in the emergency department.在急诊科行肩关节复位时,程序性镇静与超声引导下锁骨下神经阻滞的前瞻性比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):922-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01140.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
4
Pain relief for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations: a prospective randomized study comparing intravenous sedation with intra-articular lidocaine.缓解急性前肩脱位疼痛:一项比较静脉镇静与关节内利多卡因的前瞻性随机研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Jan;25(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d3d338.
5
Recovery from sedation with remifentanil and propofol, compared with morphine and midazolam, for reduction in anterior shoulder dislocation.瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚与吗啡和咪达唑仑相比在减少前肩脱位复位中的镇静恢复。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jan;28(1):6-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.067652. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
6
Reduction of acute anterior dislocations: a prospective randomized study comparing a new technique with the Hippocratic and Kocher methods.急性前脱位的复位:一项将新技术与希波克拉底法和科赫尔法进行比较的前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Dec;91(12):2775-82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01434.
7
Intraarticular lidocaine versus intravenous procedural sedation with narcotics and benzodiazepines for reduction of the dislocated shoulder: a systematic review.关节腔内注射利多卡因与静脉注射麻醉剂和苯二氮䓬类药物用于肩关节复位的比较:一项系统评价
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;15(8):703-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00164.x.
8
A new drug free technique for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations.一种用于减少肩关节前脱位的无药物新技术。
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Oct-Dec;15(5-6):521-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00512.x.
9
Dislocation of the shoulder complicated by rupture of the axillary vessels.肩关节脱位并腋血管破裂
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952 Feb;34-B(1):72-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.34B1.72.
10
Questionnaire reveals variations in the management of acute first time shoulder dislocations in the Netherlands.问卷调查显示荷兰在首次急性肩关节脱位的治疗方面存在差异。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;10(1):58-61. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200303000-00015.

一项关于急诊医护人员对当前肩关节前脱位管理情况的调查。

A Survey of Emergency Providers Regarding the Current Management of Anterior Shoulder Dislocations.

作者信息

Baden D N, Roetman M H, Boeije T, Mullaart-Jansen N, Burg M D

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, Netherlands.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_87_18. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.4103/JETS.JETS_87_18
PMID:32395054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7204951/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior shoulder dislocations (ASDs) are frequent painful injuries commonly treated in the emergency department. The last decade new potentially less traumatic and painful reduction techniques for ASDs have been introduced. Recent literature comparing best reduction techniques, medication use, and approaches is limited. To better guide future research including the use of these newer techniques, information about the current use of different reduction techniques and medication is needed.

METHODS

Our primary aim was to survey the techniques used by emergency practitioners to reduce ASDs. Our secondary objective was to gather data on medication usage during reduction. To these ends, we surveyed members of the Netherlands Society of Emergency Physicians.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of respondents reported using a traction-based technique (Hippocrates or Stimson). Biomechanical techniques were used by 40% of respondents. Twelve percent reported using the Kocher leverage-based technique. Five percent of the techniques used could not be classified. A wide variety of procedural sedation and pain management interventions were reported, with an opioid and propofol being used most commonly. Approximately 9% of the reductions were attempted without any medications.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind on ASD management by emergency practitioners. Our results indicate that Dutch emergency practitioners employ all three classes of reduction techniques: traction-countertraction most commonly, closely followed by biomechanical techniques. Medication use during repositioning varied widely. Per our survey, emergency practitioners are desirous of an evidence-based guideline for ASD management.

摘要

背景

肩关节前脱位(ASD)是急诊科常见的疼痛性损伤。在过去十年中,已引入了一些新的、可能创伤性和疼痛性较小的ASD复位技术。最近比较最佳复位技术、药物使用和方法的文献有限。为了更好地指导未来的研究,包括这些新技术的使用,需要了解不同复位技术和药物的当前使用情况。

方法

我们的主要目的是调查急诊医生用于复位ASD的技术。我们的次要目标是收集复位过程中药物使用的数据。为此,我们对荷兰急诊医师协会的成员进行了调查。

结果

44%的受访者报告使用基于牵引的技术(希波克拉底法或斯廷森法)。40%的受访者使用生物力学技术。12%的受访者报告使用基于科赫尔杠杆的技术。所使用的技术中有5%无法分类。报告了各种各样的程序性镇静和疼痛管理干预措施,最常用的是阿片类药物和丙泊酚。约9%的复位尝试未使用任何药物。

结论

据我们所知,这是同类中第一项关于急诊医生对ASD处理的研究。我们的结果表明,荷兰急诊医生采用了所有三类复位技术:最常用的是牵引-对抗牵引技术,其次是生物力学技术。复位过程中的药物使用差异很大。根据我们的调查,急诊医生希望有一个基于证据的ASD处理指南。