Emergency Physician, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Medical Student, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02242-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly seen in the emergency department for which several closed reduction techniques exist. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the most successful principle of closed reduction techniques for an acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department without the use of sedation or intra-articular lidocaine injection.
A literature search was conducted up to 15-08-2022 in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL for randomized and observational studies comparing two or more closed reduction techniques for anterior shoulder dislocations. Included techniques were grouped based on their main operating mechanism resulting in a traction-countertraction (TCT), leverage and biomechanical reduction technique (BRT) group. The primary outcome was success rate and secondary outcomes were reduction time and endured pain scores. Meta-analyses were conducted between reduction groups and for the primary outcome a network meta-analysis was performed.
A total of 3118 articles were screened on title and abstract, of which 9 were included, with a total of 987 patients. Success rates were 0.80 (95% CI 0.74; 0.85), 0.81 (95% CI 0.63; 0.92) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.56; 0.93) for BRT, leverage and TCT, respectively. No differences in success rates were observed between the three separate reduction groups. In the network meta-analysis, similar yet more precise effect estimates were found. However, in a post hoc analysis the BRT group was more successful than the combined leverage and TCT group with a relative risk of 1.33 (95% CI 1.19, 1.48).
All included techniques showed good results with regard to success of reduction. The BRT might be the preferred technique for the reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation, as patients experience the least pain and it results in the fastest reduction.
前肩关节脱位在急诊科很常见,有几种闭合复位技术。本系统评价的目的是确定在没有镇静或关节内利多卡因注射的情况下,急诊科急性前肩关节脱位最成功的闭合复位技术原则。
截至 2022 年 8 月 15 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 CENTRAL 电子数据库中进行了文献检索,以比较两种或多种前肩关节脱位闭合复位技术的随机和观察性研究。纳入的技术根据其主要操作机制进行分组,导致牵引-对抗牵引(TCT)、杠杆和生物力学复位技术(BRT)组。主要结局是成功率,次要结局是复位时间和忍受的疼痛评分。对复位组进行了荟萃分析,并对主要结局进行了网络荟萃分析。
共筛选了 3118 篇标题和摘要的文章,其中 9 篇被纳入,共 987 名患者。BRT、杠杆和 TCT 的成功率分别为 0.80(95%CI 0.74;0.85)、0.81(95%CI 0.63;0.92)和 0.80(95%CI 0.56;0.93)。三组单独的复位组之间未观察到成功率差异。在网络荟萃分析中,发现了相似但更精确的效应估计。然而,在事后分析中,BRT 组的成功率高于杠杆和 TCT 联合组,相对风险为 1.33(95%CI 1.19,1.48)。
所有纳入的技术在复位成功率方面均表现良好。BRT 可能是前肩关节脱位复位的首选技术,因为患者疼痛最小,复位最快。