Cheng Ya-Fu, Chen Heng-Chung, Ke Pei-Cing, Hung Wei-Heng, Cheng Ching-Yuan, Lin Ching-Hsiung, Wang Bing-Yen
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua.
Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1342-1349. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.12.
One challenging aspect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is finding the small pulmonary lung nodules for resection. Pre-operative localization of nodules is important for resection. Recently, image-guided VATS (iVATS) in a hybrid room has received attention. Our study aims to compare pros and cons between traditional CT room localization and iVATS localization with Artis Pheno.
This study was a retrospective analysis in our institute (Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua). Patients with pulmonary nodules who received localization between January 2018 and December 2018 were included in the study. There were 126 patients included in the study. Among these, 63 patients received localization in a CT room and the other 63 patients received iVATS. We measured the time from localization to skin incision, success rate, complication rate, operation time, blood loss and length of hospital stay.
Time from localization to skin incision was significantly shorter in the iVATS group than in the CT room group (23.57 372.11 min, P<0.001). The CT room group had a significantly higher complication rate than the iVATS group (n=49, 77.8% n=2, 3.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operation methods, operation time, blood loss and length of hospital stay.
iVATS provides shorter time from localization to skin incision and fewer complications than CT room localization.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的一个具有挑战性的方面是找到需要切除的小肺结节。术前对结节进行定位对于切除手术很重要。最近,在混合手术室中进行的图像引导VATS(iVATS)受到了关注。我们的研究旨在比较传统CT室定位与使用Artis Pheno的iVATS定位的优缺点。
本研究是在我们研究所(彰化基督教医院,彰化)进行的回顾性分析。纳入2018年1月至2018年12月期间接受肺结节定位的患者。共有126例患者纳入研究。其中,63例患者在CT室进行定位,另外63例患者接受iVATS定位。我们测量了从定位到皮肤切开的时间、成功率、并发症发生率、手术时间、失血量和住院时间。
iVATS组从定位到皮肤切开的时间明显短于CT室组(23.57±372.11分钟,P<0.001)。CT室组的并发症发生率明显高于iVATS组(n = 49,77.8% 对 n = 2,3.2%,P<0.001)。手术方式、手术时间、失血量和住院时间方面无显著差异。
与CT室定位相比,iVATS从定位到皮肤切开的时间更短,并发症更少。