• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良简易精神状态检查表在创伤性脑损伤住院康复中的效用:初步研究结果。

The utility of the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination in inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: preliminary findings.

作者信息

Weeks Douglas L, Ambrose Sara B, Tindall Angelique G

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, St. Luke's Rehabilitation Institute , Spokane, WA, USA.

Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University , Spokane, WA, USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2020 Jun 6;34(7):881-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1761564. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2020.1761564
PMID:32396468
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) could provide useful information about cognitive status in traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet has not been validated in this population. We studied the reliability, construct validity, clinical responsiveness, and cognitive impairment classification-ability of the 3MS compared to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

METHODS

Adult participants receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI were administered the 3MS and MMSE at admission and discharge (n = 72). Construct validity and classification agreement were assessed through relationships of each measure with cognitive items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and rehabilitation length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

3MS reliability at admission and discharge (Cronbach's alphas = .871 and .839, respectively) exceeded that for the MMSE (Cronbach's alpha = .748 and .653, respectively). 3MS construct validity was marginally better than for the MMSE as assessed through correlations with FIM cognitive scores and LOS. Standard error of measurement as a percentage of the total scale was lower for the 3MS; responsiveness of the 3MS was superior as assessed by the 95% confidence interval for minimal detectable change. Cognitive impairment classification-ability was superior for the 3MS.

CONCLUSIONS

While both instruments had reasonable psychometric properties, the 3MS had a superior psychometric profile in the acute phase of TBI.

摘要

目的

改良简易精神状态检查表(3MS)可为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的认知状态提供有用信息,但尚未在该人群中得到验证。我们研究了3MS与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)相比的信度、结构效度、临床反应性和认知障碍分类能力。

方法

对接受TBI住院康复服务的成年参与者在入院时和出院时进行3MS和MMSE测试(n = 72)。通过每项测量与功能独立性测量(FIM)的认知项目和康复住院时间(LOS)之间的关系来评估结构效度和分类一致性。

结果

3MS在入院时和出院时的信度(克朗巴赫系数分别为0.871和0.839)超过了MMSE(克朗巴赫系数分别为0.748和0.653)。通过与FIM认知评分和LOS的相关性评估,3MS的结构效度略优于MMSE。3MS测量标准误占总分的百分比更低;通过最小可检测变化的95%置信区间评估,3MS的反应性更好。3MS的认知障碍分类能力更强。

结论

虽然两种工具都具有合理的心理测量特性,但在TBI急性期,3MS具有更优的心理测量特征。

相似文献

1
The utility of the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination in inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: preliminary findings.改良简易精神状态检查表在创伤性脑损伤住院康复中的效用:初步研究结果。
Brain Inj. 2020 Jun 6;34(7):881-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1761564. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the MMSE and MoCA questionnaires in Tanzanian Swahili for a traumatic brain injury population.跨文化调适及简易精神状态检查表和蒙特利尔认知评估量表在坦桑尼亚斯瓦希里语用于创伤性脑损伤人群的心理计量特性。
BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1283-9.
3
Comparing the Mini-Mental State Examination and the modified Mini-Mental State Examination in the detection of mild cognitive impairment in older adults.比较简易精神状态检查和改良简易精神状态检查在老年人轻度认知障碍检测中的应用。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):693-701. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001023. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Folstein vs modified Mini-Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke. Stability, validity, and screening utility.老年卒中患者中Folstein简易精神状态检查表与改良版简易精神状态检查表的比较。稳定性、效度及筛查效用
Arch Neurol. 1995 May;52(5):477-84. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540290067019.
5
Community screening for dementia: the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) compared.社区痴呆筛查:简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)与改良简易精神状态检查表(3MS)的比较
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;50(4):377-83. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00060-7.
6
Reliability and validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury.罗澜通用失智评估量表用于颅脑损伤患者的信度和效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1160-1166. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1856850. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
Examining Cognitive Status of Elderly Iranians: Farsi Version of the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination.评估伊朗老年人的认知状态:改良简易精神状态检查表的波斯语版本
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013 Jul-Sep;20(3):215-220. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.688228. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
Comparative analysis of rowland universal dementia assessment scale and mini-mental state examination in cognitive assessment of traumatic brain injury patients.罗文通用痴呆评估量表和简易精神状态检查在颅脑损伤患者认知评估中的对比分析。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(1):39-46. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210044.
9
Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on functional independence measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges.创伤性脑损伤早期变量对功能独立性测量评分、康复住院时间及费用的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep;76(9):797-803. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80542-7.
10
Preliminary study of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury.中文版圣路易斯大学精神状态检查(SLUMS)检测颅脑损伤患者认知障碍的效度和信度的初步研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Nov-Dec;28(6):633-640. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1680986. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.金刚烷胺在创伤性脑损伤中的应用:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 21;15:1444623. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1444623. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring racial performance disparities with the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) in an acute brain injury rehabilitation setting.在急性脑损伤康复环境中使用改良的简易精神状态检查(3MS)探索种族表现差异。
Rehabil Psychol. 2022 Nov;67(4):597-601. doi: 10.1037/rep0000465. Epub 2022 Sep 12.