Suppr超能文献

[基于临床参数的捷克共和国院前创伤分诊系统与重伤患者损伤严重度评分的比较]

[Comparison of Trauma Triage System in Prehospital Care Based on the Clinical Parameters with the ISS Score in Severely Injured Patients in the Czech Republic].

作者信息

Holeš D, Ječmínková R, Burša F

机构信息

Jesseniova lekárska fakulta v Martine, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):120-126.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of the study is to verify the sensitivity of pre-hospital triage algorithm used in the Czech Republic, which decides on directing the patients at risk of a failure of vital functions into a trauma centre. Another aim is to find out whether the triage algorithm extension by items F4-persistent traumatic paralysis and M7-buried under heavy objects, implemented in 2015, resulted in an increased sensitivity of triage. MATERIAL AND METHODS It is a retrospective, observational, monocentric study. Included in the study were all the trauma patients with the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) score 3-6 treated in the given period, directed by the emergency medical service to the trauma centre. Two groups of patients were compared. In the first group, triage was performed in line with the Bulletin of the Ministry of Health of 2008, while in the second group it was performed in line with the updated version published in the Bulletin of the Ministry of Health in 2015. Both the groups were later compared with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) obtained after the diagnosis of injury in the Trauma Centre of the University Hospital Ostrava. In the second group, also certain selected parameters were assessed. Group A: Patients treated by the Emergency Medical Service of the Moravia-Silesia Region in the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014 who met the NACA 3-6 criterion and were identified by paramedics as triage positive in line with the pre-hospital triage 2008. Group B: Patients treated by the Emergency Medical Service of the Moravia-Silesia Region in the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017 who met the NACA 3-6 criterion and were identified by paramedics as triage positive in line with the pre-hospital triage 2015. In Group B, also monitored was the number of patients identified as triage positive only based on F4 and M7. RESULTS The first group included 3,475 patients, of whom 435 were triage positive. In the respective period, the Trauma Centre of the University Hospital Ostrava identified 262 patients with ISS greater than 15 points. The pre-hospital triage and ISS greater than 15 points corresponded in 210 patients. 19.9% were false negative (52/262). The mean ISS was 33.1±9.4, median 34, IQR 25.5--1. In Group A, the sensitivity of triage criteria reached 80.2% (95% IS: 74.7-84.7%), the specificity was 93.0% (95% IS: 92.0-93.8%). The second group included 3,816 patients, of whom 586 were triage positive. In the monitored period, the Trauma Centre of the University Hospital Ostrava identified 363 patients with ISS greater than 15 points. The pre-hospital triage and ISS greater than 15 points corresponded in 313 patients. 13.8% were false negative (50/363). The mean ISS was 43.7±12.0, median 42, IQR 33-54. In Group B, the sensitivity of triage criteria reached 86.2% (95% IS: 82.1-89.5%), the specificity was 98.5% (95% IS: 97.9-98.8%). In Group B, 11 patients were identified as triage positive based on F4 and M7 items. No statistically significant difference was found (chi-squared test, p = 0.257) after adding the F4 and M7 items to the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS The triage system for pre-hospital care in the Czech Republic in line with the applicable pre-hospital triage has high sensitivity as well as specificity and the results correspond to the latest triage algorithms used abroad. Increased sensitivity as a result of adding the new triage items was not confirmed. Key words: pre-hospital triage.

摘要

研究目的 本研究的目的是验证捷克共和国使用的院前分诊算法的敏感性,该算法用于决定将有生命功能衰竭风险的患者送往创伤中心。另一个目的是了解2015年实施的将F4 - 持续性创伤性瘫痪和M7 - 被重物掩埋纳入分诊算法是否提高了分诊的敏感性。材料与方法 这是一项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。纳入研究的是在给定时期内接受治疗的所有美国国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)评分为3 - 6分的创伤患者,由紧急医疗服务机构送往创伤中心。比较了两组患者。第一组按照2008年卫生部公告进行分诊,而第二组按照2015年卫生部公告发布的更新版本进行分诊。两组随后均与在俄斯特拉发大学医院创伤中心诊断损伤后获得的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)进行比较。在第二组中,还评估了某些选定参数。A组:2013年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间由摩拉维亚 - 西里西亚地区紧急医疗服务机构治疗的符合NACA 3 - 6标准且被护理人员按照2008年院前分诊判定为分诊阳性的患者。B组:2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间由摩拉维亚 - 西里西亚地区紧急医疗服务机构治疗的符合NACA 标准且被护理人员按照2015年院前分诊判定为分诊阳性的患者。在B组中,还监测了仅基于F4和M7被判定为分诊阳性的患者数量。结果 第一组包括3475例患者,其中435例分诊阳性。在相应时期,俄斯特拉发大学医院创伤中心确定262例ISS大于15分的患者。院前分诊与ISS大于15分在210例患者中相符。假阴性率为19.9%(52/262)。平均ISS为33.1±9.4,中位数为34,四分位数间距为25.5 - 41。在A组中,分诊标准的敏感性达到80.2%(95%可信区间:74.7 - 84.7%),特异性为93.0%(95%可信区间:92.0 - 93.8%)。第二组包括3816例患者,其中586例分诊阳性。在监测期内,俄斯特拉发大学医院创伤中心确定363例ISS大于15分的患者。院前分诊与ISS大于15分在313例患者中相符。假阴性率为13.8%(50/363)。平均ISS为43.7±12.0,中位数为42,四分位数间距为33 - 54。在B组中,分诊标准的敏感性达到86.2%(95%可信区间:82.1 - 89.5%),特异性为98.5%(95%可信区间:97.9 - 98.8%)。在B组中,11例患者基于F4和M7项目被判定为分诊阳性。将F4和M7项目添加到算法后未发现统计学显著差异(卡方检验,p = 0.257)。结论 捷克共和国符合适用的院前分诊的院前护理分诊系统具有高敏感性和特异性,结果与国外使用的最新分诊算法相符。未证实添加新的分诊项目会提高敏感性。关键词:院前分诊

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验